• This topic has 29 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by Pook.
Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Mornington Cresent advice please
  • therealhoops
    Free Member

    '75 rules for North West Division IIIrevB, as it's a Thursday Stovolds ruling isn't in play until 5pm

    So I'm at Moorgate with the intention of a MC via Baker Street. Farringdon is closed but Embankment is clear. I don't fancy the long way because of the extra move required.
    Could I go to Euston or would that incur a nibbing?

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    You are a day early for MC, and so have found yourself in the sidings.

    Another similar violation, and your operator's licence may be suspended pending a stewards enquiry (rule 18(c) of the '75 NW Div Rules).

    HTH.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    Are we stacking the perpendicular?

    Pigface
    Free Member

    Sorry dont play Northwest rules, since the breakaway and subsequent splitting of the controlling bodies I would face extreme sanction if I were to suggest a move.

    awh
    Free Member

    I think you you would be in nib. I'm only a new player though, only played since 1978, so I could be wrong.

    wombat
    Full Member

    The OP is correct, going via Euston would put him in Nib.

    You could use Turings Variation and try a reverse entry through Blackfriars

    Pook
    Full Member

    You can't reverse entry through Blackfriars owing to to platform work underway.

    I'd stack the perpendicular as neatly suggested by the captain and alight in Pimlico.

    therealhoops
    Free Member

    Tiz but a hypothetical game to avoid any sidings. I'm not sure about stacking, as I'm only Div3 all I can do is parallel 🙁

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    Pimlico? PIMLICO?

    A blue line, on a Thursday? Oh my dear Lord, I am surrounded by amateurs.

    Pook
    Full Member

    sometimes the simplest moves are the most effective Fauntleroy

    andycs
    Full Member

    Get a life, go ride your bikes!!!!!!!!!!

    thepurist
    Full Member

    I think AndyCS has a point – Stannard's option on clause 17b of the '75 rules specifically allows overland velocipede access to Euston without incurring the nib.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    Get a life, go ride your bikes!!!!!!!!!!

    I'm not aware of this from the NW Rules. Is this a recent variation and, if so, has it been fully ratified?

    If yes – and I know I am risk of my own nibbing if I'm playing an unratified move – it would seem to indicate Dollis Hill.

    wombat
    Full Member

    thepurist – Member
    I think AndyCS has a point – Stannard's option on clause 17b of the '75 rules specifically allows overland velocipede access to Euston without incurring the nib.

    That is correct ONLY if you are playing Brompton's Venturi Variant

    therealhoops
    Free Member

    how about Fauntleroy then Dollis? is the connecting bus service in operation?

    wombat
    Full Member

    The connecting bus service only runs on odd numbered days IIRC

    grahamt1980
    Full Member

    It also results in an enforced diversion via waterloo if used in february

    therealhoops
    Free Member

    arse, worth a punt though 🙁

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    arse, worth a punt though

    Hold on, though. There's a chance that Waterloo to Turnpike Lane via Farringdon might just unlock it.

    Wouldn't be certain, though.

    matthewjb
    Free Member

    More info needed really.

    Are you using an Oyster card?

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    Are you using an Oyster card?

    No, cash.

    therealhoops
    Free Member

    no Oyster card but wait! I think andycs might be onto something. "Get a life" was a mistype for "Get a lift", and "go ride your bikes" is a mistyped instruction to "go right" at Oval (bikes=Oval sowff of da rivva).
    Nice plan Andy to go via Vauxhall but I'd still need to change to the blue line.

    vinnyeh
    Full Member

    As the first person to spot the op's spelling error in the subject line I will invoke the Livingstone clause and exile him to Croydon to await the opening of the East London line extension before rejoining the rest of the players on the Underground.

    Pook
    Full Member

    *Fauntleroy being a person, and not a place, I'd suggest that the realhoops is now in nib.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    Fauntleroy being a person, and not a place

    No, just a euphemism for South Ken. No nib, carry on OP, you might be able to work out an exit from Croydon.

    clubber
    Free Member

    Voltz-Hamberinger's conflict anyone? Rather suprised that no-one's mentioned it yet given that most of the suggestions so far violate it. Especially since the De Heveningham ruling in 2007 (which closed out a nasty loophole that had caused a lot of bad feeling…)

    wombat
    Full Member

    I was under the impression that the De Heveningham ruling in 2007 only applied where Schrodinger's Violtation had been pre-empted..

    clubber
    Free Member

    True enough but you've missed out the Moorgate 1975 Crash exemption which makes it apply irrespective.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    In which case clubber, and I am no expert at this level of intricacy, then I think the move goes Croydon -> Royal Albert -> Prince regent (for the Prince Albert double points score) -> Aldgate East -> Great Portland Street.

    But I could be wrong.

    Pook
    Full Member

    I still think hoops is in nib. I'm very disappointed with how this game has panned out, De Heveningham or no De Heveningham

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)

The topic ‘Mornington Cresent advice please’ is closed to new replies.