please make my mind up for me. I like Hemlock but the pace's are meant to be great at climbing. But then which Pace.
Bike Forum
[closed]
Hemlock or 405 / 506
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
ride em, then decide?
fwiw, we've got an ex-demo hemlock for sale soon, along with a bargain RC506 frame. both medium.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I Need a large. I was in last friday, after trying to kill my self on the peaks. Do you have a demo in large.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I had a large pace 405 for 6 mts last year - I only sold it as it felt a bit too big to be chuckable (im 5 11) and the medium felt a bit too small. Id definitely demo one to make sure the sizing is for you.
The pace went up like a goat - no bob whatsoever & never adjusted the floodgate on the DT swiss shock to lock it out. It was also fantastically plush on the descents. (I sold it to buy a 5AM but then sold that to buy a mojo as the single pivot 5 felt a bit 'wooden'- I must be a multi pivot fan boi! )
Here is my old bike in sierra nevada last year - it handled all the trails brilliantly & never felt like I needed more travel so I think the 506 would be too much for the uk unless you do a bit of freeride etc.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'm 5'8" and have had a medium 405 for a couple of years. When sat on the bike stationary it seems a little short (with a 70mm stem and 710mm wide bars) but when riding it pedals superbly, climbs superbly and descending it gets more stable the faster you go.
I've not ridden the 506 or Hemlock (but have contemplated both and doubt I'd be disappointed with either) but do love the 405.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I've not ridden the Pace so can't compare, but so far I like my Hemlock a lot, it's very confidence inspiring and capable but also very involving... But as far as climbing goes, it's more than good enough but it's not amazing.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I've got a large 405 and love it. Not as chuckable as my Trance was (although I felt in the end that was a bit small for me so bought the 405 instead).
I'm 6ft and have a large 405. So long as you are taller than that a large will be the right size.
All that good stuff about climbing well etc is seems true but no idea how it compares with a Hemlock. I did demo a 506 but though it was a bit too much really; the 405 is far more capable than I am anyway!
Posted 2 years ago # -
I've got a large hemlock, (at the moment!) i'm only 5'10 but with a 70mm stem it's a nice length. Very low standover anyways. I thought about a 405 (still am to be honest!) but hemmy's are better value! My large weighed 6.2lb, the Paces are weighed without the shock, so you cant believe what they state. I find it climbs nice, great on the downs too. You also get the choice of different length rockers to change the travel, although i have only used the longer ones once, and leave it short!
Posted 2 years ago # -
Thinking the Hemlock because I want to put some 160 forks on. Is the 506 to much bike for the uk.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Been riding my 08 ex demo Hemlock for 18mths now, 100mm rear 160mm talas on the front.
Just a few thoughts -
Having forks with 110/130/160 is usefull as its quite slack on full travel. At 110 the BB is too low for anything rougher than gravel (techy/steppy climbs), 130 is perfect for though.
If its not a long climb then i don't even bother as just a shift of weight is enough to keep the front end down.
I have cleaned the climb upto Jacobs Ladder (with a few stops for breath) and the it breezes up the Golspie climb.As for heading back down, its 160 all the way. The only place i have wanted a different bike was the Fort Bill DH track!!
If it helps i fit happily in the Trail riding pigeon hole, riding mostly local xc with pretty much any trail centre Black stuff and the odd big drop thrown in.
Also, sometimes i forget to put the forks back up and ride everthing at 130, not sure what that says about my bike or bike testing skills because it takes me ages to notice
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'm 5'10" and ride a medium 405 with a 70mm stem and layback post. Love mine. Climbs well, descends well, goes well, what more do you want? Run mine with hardly any floodgate on the DTSwiss shock, still no bob. IMO a brilliant design.
Posted 2 years ago # -
100mm! I thought they were 120mm rear travel
Posted 2 years ago # -
My Hemlock is short travel rear, long travel Travis forks at the front (no travel adjust or lock down malarky) , and climbs like stink. [biased opinion]
Posted 2 years ago # -
I thought they were 120mm rear travel
the 2008 (1st generation?) Hemlocks were 100/150, this changed to 120/150 in 2009.
the 30mm difference might not sound much, but the change in personality between the plates is more than the numbers might suggest.
Posted 2 years ago # -
The Hemlock is looking good. Was thinking lyrik or talas 36, flow rims on pro2's, the new middleburn cranks, xt or slx gears, raceface atlas bars, hope stem,headset and bb. And may be a telescopic seatpost.
Posted 2 years ago # -
here's mine! And i know the garden/patio/hedge is in need of attention!
Posted 2 years ago # -
nice
Posted 2 years ago # -
I went through exactly the same decision process last year. I got the hemlock in the end as it was a better fit - I'm too big for a small pace; too short for a medium. Got a small hemlock.
I like the better standover of the hemlock and the slacker angles. Run mine with 120 at the back and 150 u-turns up front. Anodised finish is nice too.
The new seat and chainstays are much better than the old ones too (i'm changed mine over).
Its mental downhill and pretty decent up hill if you have an in line post.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Forgot to add, the Hemlock is not pretty, it's kind of industrial looking, i love it but i love Nicolai's as well.
In fact a mate saw it for the first time the other day and his comment was 'never soon one in the flesh they look a lot a better than i thought'
This sums it up, photo's don't do it justice, plus it looks nicer with short rockers.
Posted 2 years ago # -
How light/heavy is your Hemlock. Depending if your a optimist or pessimist.
Posted 2 years ago # -
is that a question? - or a statement?
Posted 2 years ago # -
any more pic's
Posted 2 years ago # -
my hemlock is about 26-27 pounds.
Hope sp xc 6 wheels, 2010 u turn revs, xt kit, carbon bars and post
Don't know how to post pics but it looks nice!
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'd quite fancy a Hemlock but i just cant get over how ugly that back end is. Cy please do something about it. still its not as ugly as Pace's 204
Posted 2 years ago # -
but being indecisive I also have;
Posted 2 years ago # -
So which is the best one then.
Posted 2 years ago # -
So which is the best one then
Both great, but different - whichever you choose will not disappoint
Posted 2 years ago # -
mines also 26.5lb with the short rockers, Thors etc, could go lighter but it would just get stupid money! Does me at the moment(ish)!
Posted 2 years ago # -
more info DeeJay
Posted 2 years ago # -
having ridden both; the pace feels a bit more 'XC' - i think this is mostly down to the slightly steeper head angle.
it's very easy to make a hemlock feel a bit like a Dh bike* - i think this is mostly down to the slightly slacker head angle...
(*only one that climbs well too)
there's not much in it, but if i had to go looking for differences...
Pace: encourages climbing, descends well tho, didn't need much pro-pedal to control the bob.
Hemlock: encourages descending, climbs well tho, a bit more reliant on pro-pedal to control pedal bob, but the horst-link back end works nicely even when the brake is on.
i chose the Hemlock for the proper-4-bar-works-even-under-braking design, the slack head angle, and the choice of playing with different rockers/forks.
Posted 2 years ago # -
which one will take the most stick? drops, fast rocky desents, like the peaks and the odd jump
Posted 2 years ago # -
they're both the same weight, so i doubt there's much in it.
the 2009 Hemlock chainstays have a question mark of reliability hanging over them, after a few broke. a missing washer was thought to be to blame, but mine broke even though the accused washer was installed.
it's left me a little shaken actually; i'm a skinny coward, i shouldn't be able to brake anything. i certainly don't do anything like what oxnop is showing us in that Pace piccy up there ^.
(i'd want a run-up, and Downhill bike, and a landing transition)
the 2008 chainstays are fine, the 2010 chainstays are even stronger, and stiffer too.
they're both light bikes, not really built for abuse, i doubt you'll break either one in the peaks. I do like my Hemlock, but wish there was a hefty BFE Grrr! version...
Posted 2 years ago # -
having said that, the Hemlock has passed the CEN test, which consists of holding the frame in a vice, and then driving a truck full of anvils into it at speed. and then nuking the site from orbit...
Posted 2 years ago # -
The black looks good on the Hemlock but that orange pace is sweet, it just needs the back end orange as well.
Posted 2 years ago # -
more info DeeJay
Get yourself a demo - it really is the only way - you are not that far away from me - email in profile should you want to get in touch.
Posted 2 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
