Can somebody ban Barnes please?
Chat Forum
[closed]
B&W photography on film, who else enjoys it?
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
Can somebody ban Barnes please?
and what of freedom of speech ? To me the idea of a "classic" shot demanding a certain camera setup and positioning is an anathema, the opposite of invention and spontaneity
Posted 1 year ago # -
i.e. Simon doesn't have a wide angle lens - ergo wide angle shots are boring and just sticking to the rules. Only shots that can be taken on auto, in burst mode, without composition, on an 18-200 lens truly break the rules and have any artistic merit
Posted 1 year ago # -
Graham, nice shot!
Posted 1 year ago # -
To me the idea of a "classic" shot demanding a certain camera setup and positioning is an anathema, the opposite of invention and spontaneity
You are totally missing the point.
The existence of a 'classic' shot does NOT in any way constitute a demand for anything. Classic just means common and well known but still good. It does not mean something to aim for or something that should be valued above other things.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Graham, nice shot!
Not sure if you mean the photo, or the (cheap) shot at Simon. But I'll take either as a compliment - cheers!
Posted 1 year ago # -
I'm scared of this thread now.
you mean there's one shot ?? So once that's been done we can all give up and take up knitting ?
Well , once you have a shot that features you subject prominently, any undesirable backgrounds are blurred out and you don't have any gurning or suspect looking riding going on, you have your shot. And you can get on with riding.
Posted 1 year ago # -
You know what, I agree with Simon. Obviously he's enjoying making a snappy discussion out of it, but his basic point is true.
Just about all the talk of 'creativity' on this thread is about what gear and settings you need to recreate other people's 'creativity'.
An old camera might be fun, but IMO digital gives you much more chance to experiment since you can try all the angles and options without running out of film and you can review the effect immediately.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Just about all the talk of 'creativity' on this thread is about what gear and settings you need to recreate other people's 'creativity'.
Understanding some rules about composition is not about copying other people, it is about trying to understand why a picture 'works'.
Strong diagonal, negative space, tension and converging sight lines. What unoriginal derivative nonsense eh? Posted 1 year ago # -
Simon doesn't have a wide angle lens - ergo wide angle shots are boring and just sticking to the rules. Only shots that can be taken on auto, in burst mode, without composition, on an 18-200 lens truly break the rules and have any artistic merit
a weak rejoinder Graham, as I never said any of those things and have specifically disclaimed any artistic ability - it's the idea of following a prescription for a shot I object to!
Understanding some rules about composition is not about copying other people, it is about trying to understand why a picture 'works'.
that's fine if you want guidelines to follow, but I can't work that way
Strong diagonal, negative space, tension and converging sight lines. What unoriginal derivative nonsense eh?
first of all, you have no idea if Michaelangelo used any of those ideas as he painted, and his comformance, whether intentional or merely speculation may be incidental to the power of the work. I don't know what negative space or tension even mean.
Posted 1 year ago # -
As a new member of the forum, I've only just come across this thread (and many of it's laughable replies.)
I'm surprised nobody has started the argument about AF lenses making things too easy for shooting!
Seriously though, I picked up a Canon A1 a year or so back to have a play with film but have never gotten round to sorting out my own lab and can only find not-so-cheap labs to send away for developing - does anyone else use post labs?
The closest thing I have is Silver Efex plugin in Aperture, which isn't all that bad...
Posted 1 year ago # -
but IMO digital gives you much more chance to experiment since you can try all the angles and options without running out of film and you can review the effect immediately
Agreed.
Posted 1 year ago # -
you have your shot. And you can get on with riding.
some of us have more insatiable appetites :o)
Posted 1 year ago # -
that's fine if you want guidelines to follow, but I can't work that way
But you "have specifically disclaimed any artistic ability" so perhaps at least considering why a composition works might go some way to improving your own.
As I said, I'm not very artistic. I've an engineer's mind and I just don't have a good compositional eye.
But instead of just shrugging and defensively claiming that anyone who takes good, interesting, compositionally strong pictures is somehow cheating, I am trying to improve my own pictures by doing some reading and trying to apply some ideas.
I'm currently reading:
The Photographer's Eye by Michael Freemanfirst of all, you have no idea if Michaelangelo used any of those ideas as he painted, and his comformance, whether intentional or merely speculation may be incidental to the power of the work.
Well I don't know much about Art history but as I understand it, a lot of the Renaissance art was about discovering these compositional techniques (golden ratios, linear perspective, light and shadow).
So I'm fairly sure Michaelangelo would be aware of them, whether it was through conscious discussion or just unconscious influence of the prevailing artistic styles.
I don't know what negative space or tension even mean.
Maybe you should find out before dismissing them?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Right - I'm going to wrest control of this thread away from SFB's smug, self-satisfied bullshit by spamming the thread with B&W photographs.
Any objections before I start?
Posted 1 year ago # -
No? OK here goes..
Apologies for the fact that all of these are digital images processed through Photoshop & Silver Efex Pro, but feel free to comment or make suggestions for improvement to composition, technique. I don't claim to be a great photographer but I am eager to improve.
Destitution Road by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
caig1 by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
Any objections before I start?
Please do!
Can you also tell us what camera/lens you took 'em on, aperture etc if you happen to know it?
Posted 1 year ago # -
72/365 by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
forgetmenots2 by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
Sexy! Quite dark, but I suspect that is as much due to this crappy work monitor as anything else.
Have you had any printed?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Graham,
All the EXIF data can be found by clicking on the photos. This will show the camera used in the top right and if you click on that, you'll see the stats.
Cameras are either a Ricoh GX100 or a Sony a300, with one or two being on a Panasonic bridge camera (can't remember model). Sony lenses are either a SAM 18-55 or a Sigma 50mm EX-DG macro for the closeups.
Posted 1 year ago # -
The Buachaille by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
I don't print many Graham which is down to laziness more than anything.
A lot of them have a dark, low-key feel which is something I've noticed when I see them together. I like black skies and white clouds (red filter effect).
Posted 1 year ago # -
45/365 by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
Laggan 28 by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
Yay! Thread back on track.
Pentax ME Super, Ilford FP4 film
Posted 1 year ago # -
night_sky by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
Big Sky Country 2 by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
Ireland 10 by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago # -
Any objections before I start?
not from me
But you "have specifically disclaimed any artistic ability" so perhaps at least considering why a composition works might go some way to improving your own.
no, I prefer to reject the concept and see what happens
But instead of just shrugging and defensively claiming that anyone who takes good, interesting, compositionally strong pictures is somehow cheating,
I'm not trying to defend myself, and I'm not saying that following the guildelines is cheating, or won't work, just that all I'm interested in is the impact of the original scene as a gestalt, in an intuitive impulse, not a protracted analysis. I never said different approaches were wrong at all.
while the site was down I was thinking about the comment someone made about my shots lacking composition, which I take as a huge compliment, though in many cases, when I'm firing from a moving vehicle I'm just glad to get a clear shot of the sky without blurred vegetation, signposts and wires in the way
Posted 1 year ago # -
Nice one Beanum - captures the drummer lost in the moment.
Posted 1 year ago # -
bit of a doublish post, didn't see it had gone up
Posted 1 year ago # -
I've always liked Araki's b/w pics. Some are right up there. Not quite Ansel Adams but some great shots nevertheless. Fantastic balance of dark and light, both in composition and in subject
Posted 1 year ago # -
garlicR by stuartie_c, on FlickrPosted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
