EDIT: WHoosh JHJ

@ Scotsroutes :After he carefully listened and understood my needs he is making me a chicken curry 😉

I have no idea it as it gives no information. Shall I guess and then praise my awesome reasoning abilities and just repeat the sentence that does not tell us why he spoke to him ?

WE DONT KNOW AS IT DOES NOT SAY SO ANYTHING WE SAY IS CONJECTURE.

JHJ,as you’re clearly struggling with this, no one is saying that he didn’t talk about the subject in hand. We’re all saying that even if that is possible or likely even, it’s still conjecture. As jy pointed out, taking to brant doesn’t prove that you discussed bikes. It’s conjecture. Guessing.

There’s a lot to be said for doing your own research…

My father was a sexual predator like Jimmy Savile says son of former Tory MP

“At the very least he is guilty of prolific predatory sexual behaviour. My father was predatory and prolific and we [my mother, my sister and I] all thought that the behaviour attributed to Jimmy Savile of being predatory and prolific also applied to him.”

When Tom Watson, the Labour MP, claimed in the House of Commons in October 2012 that ‘a paedophile network’ may have existed in the past at a high level, protected by connections to Parliament, Anthony Atkinson and his mother Susan got in touch with the MP, suggesting their father might have been at the very least on the fringes of the group.

Anthony Atkinson was told by a school friend that a teacher had claimed that the MP was a “paedophile”.

Mr Atkinson also discovered on the internet a claim made by a former American intern of improper conduct by the MP.

Oh, right, I thought for the time being we were just talking about this:

Though the South Africa links are certainly worthy of further scrutiny, as they also link to Northern Ireland:

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt4a9ie5MGk[/video]

Link = interaction = maybe you should try reading

So I take it you’re not taking the time to read or research anything…

(^That’s conjecture by the way)

Anthony Atkinson was told by a school friend that a teacher had claimed that the MP was a “paedophile”.
So best evidence is 3rd hand hearsay uncorroborated by anything. Given the homophobic prejudice of the time that often suggested links between homosexuality and paedopilia not exactly strong .
Didn’t you make a similar gay therefore a paedo assertion about another MP linked to Fashanu a while ago jhj?

What hostility?

No. Facts, and justice are key. Your version of “exposure” is just mindless conjecture, photos of people with other people who must have known people and more conjecture.

For example, your point that Mountbatten had “young boys” on the boat with him was about as direct a “nudge, nudge, eh? e’s one of THEM” moment as possible. You were quite obviously trying to state he was a kiddyfiddler, but had zero fact to back it up with so resorted to innuendo.

It’s not hostile. As others have put it –

I stand by my assertions of Lord Mountbatten’s involvement… you should check the last page and the post about Charles Hornby for an introduction.

It is tricky, as along with many others, I have done a vast amount of research~ I appreciate others on here are unlikely to have the same depth of knowledge on the issue, so I try to present it in the simplest form possible.

Sometimes it takes hours and days to piece together one part of the story and due to the complexity and wealth of information it can’t be revealed it all at once.

Legally, I am obliged to say allegedly…

“The individuals who have watched online film clips, read online articles and believed in the allegations would do well to reflect that ‘things may not be what they seem’ and that it is all too easy to be duped on the basis of partial information. There are many campaigning people, sadly, who derive satisfaction from spreading their own poisonous version of history irrespective of whether it is true or not”
Do your own research read the case that quote comes from clue it’s been covered by your mates in before its news and involves organised child abuse by teachers and police officers .

If you want more on Mountbatten Flash, refer to the link I’ve already mentioned, or better still, do your own research

Damn you Flash for phrasing it so much better than I did!

Legally how? You can’t libel the dead, that’s why people can say what they like about Jimmy Savile without fear of the courts.

You’re just going to have to be patient…

daresay you’ve not taken the time to read the links provided today anyhow, which means much like nemesis, you’re relying on idle conjecture.

Bit of politeness wouldn’t go amiss either.

Speaking theoretically…

If there was a living survivor of abuse by Mountbatten, would they be a victim, or an alleged victim?

At what point did survivors of Jimmy Savile’s abuse stop being alleged victims and start being victims?

See, that normally happens in a courtroom where the accused has a chance to defend themselves. I think JHJs point is that we skipped that bit with Saville (on account of him being dead and all)

For contrast to what has now been established, due to extensive investigation, have a read of this from 2012, just before the Savile exposure was 1st aired…

http://www.itv.com/news/2012-09-30/bbc-jimmy-savile-accused-of-sexually-abusing-girls-in-itv-exposure-documentary/

No. No it isn’t, especially when the personal details (names, addresses and telephone numbers) of some of the alleged victims have been accidentally leaked.

At best we’re talking criminal negligence.

I’ve no doubt that there has been something rotten at the heart of politics for a very long time and that children written off by society have been used as toys by privileged people. These people only ever seem to be uncovered years after they die, yet the news is full of quotes along the lines of “the signs were obvious”.

That said, in all the research I’ve read there have been a few things that trouble me. Certain websites are hyping the most tenuous of associations as statements of guilt, language like “Savile was associated with…” cheapen the whole thing. I don’t like the continued whispered insinuation that it’s all a massive Jewish conspiracy either.

Frankly, I wouldn’t trust Michael Gove to head an inquiry into why my bus was ten minutes late, there needs to be an independent commission outside the influence and remit of any political party.