For clarity, you have access at your side to the front and rear via your own driveway and also a gate which allows you alternative access to the front via your neighbours garden?
Why do you need the gate at all then?
We don’t . It was there when we bought the house.
So the steps thing is completely irrelevant and this is just about “rights”. I go into the gardens of a couple of my neighbours every week or so – in order to put their bins out. They reciprocate when suitable. They’re your neighbours. Why not just let them have the same rights as you if that’s as convenient for them as it is for you?
It’s not. We don’t generally go through their garden even though we have the right to do so, as in my view it’s a bit cheeky – but we have an express right of way to do so. Conversely, they don’t have any right to do so but they are.
It’s nothing to do with bins etc – wrong part of the gardens (bins are at the front).
The “steps thing” isn’t irrelevant – I am genuinely concerned they may fall as they’re rickety at best.
I assume these are both mid terraces, with access provided for bins and so on? So they will have access through the end terrace and are perhaps just going the wrong way around.
No – it’s a bit complex (which is why I didn’t try to explain) but (as you look at them) we are left side, our house, front and rear gardens abut the rear gardens of houses on the next road, with no access from front to rear. They, on the right, have a driveway all the way to the back of their house, and there’s a path that runs up on the right of their garden and then cuts across it, to the gate and end of our garden. There’s a driveway at the end of our garden which opens out on to the other road.
Why not just let them? What are the chances of them falling over and suing you, in reality?
Well, we’ve lived there for years and have fallen over quite a few times. Nothing serious, but then we’re aware of the risk. Not so much the suing thing that’s worrying me but more the risk of injury to the mum or child.
Also how come your house needs the access but there’s doesn’t? Or is it just some weird legal quirk & no-one knows why the deeds are written this way?
Some historic thing – seems like the previous owners of the two properties had rows in the past so everything had to be set out in deed to confirm exactly where they could and couldn’t walk, park etc etc.
Just to complicate matters further, the driveway to the road isn’t legally ours, but we have a right of way over it which doesn’t extend to them. Like I said, complicated!