Why not make helmet...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Why not make helmets compulsory when riding anywhere?

41 Posts
27 Users
0 Reactions
145 Views
 SiB
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've read on here before that you must legally have reflectors on your pedals if they were fitted with them........surely something a bit more serious like having to wear a helmet is more enforceable and sensible?


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What is the benefit of the legislation?


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:13 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I think someone will be along with the phrase "Pulls up chair" quite soon.
I however, will avoid any further involvement in this thread.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

lots of people, as you're probably about to find out, dispute any safety benefits of wearing a helmet.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:14 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

On the road, I would much rather have reflectors than a helmet, if I had to choose just one. 🙂


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

This has been debated to death so many times. Have a look here for the pros and cons.

http://www.cyclehelmets.org/1119.html


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:16 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Uplink, any Earl Grey and a nice Duchy Originals Lemon Shortbread, perchance?


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:17 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

and indeed, there's the opposing view that enforcing helmet wear stops people getting on their bikes.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Uplink, any Earl Grey and a nice Duchy Originals Lemon Shortbread, perchance?

Afternoon off - so it's beer & nuts


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:21 pm
 SiB
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I wasnt implying that helmets should be worn, just wondering why there isn't any legislation surrounding it when there is for pedal reflectors.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:23 pm
Posts: 34473
Full Member
 

TJ and Frenchie boy to the thread please...


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got some cream bourbons if they float your boat Flashy.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:24 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Beer? Hmmm, normally yes, but I'm going for a spin round the Park after work, so I'd better not.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SiB - Member
I wasnt implying that helmets should be worn, just wondering why there isn't any legislation surrounding it when there is for pedal reflectors.

In a word (well 2) - Rotational forces


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And you must have a bell ... I mean on an MTB!! FFS


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:26 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[i]I wasnt implying that helmets should be worn, just wondering why there isn't any legislation surrounding it when there is for pedal reflectors.
[/i]

Because the nanny state has limited time and energy to invent new ways to bother us, and last turned its attention to the problems of nagging bicyclists before helmet manufacturers realised how lucrative selling lumps of polystyrene could be. But IIRC it became compulsory to fit a bell to all bicycles in bicycle shops relatively recently. Although that might have been a European thing, and as we know, yerpeans do generally have bells on their bicycles but have yet to notice that riding a bicycle without a helmet on spells certain death.

🙂


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:28 pm
Posts: 34473
Full Member
 

Shocking isn't it?


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Reflectors are more important than helmets.

Maybe cars should all be fitted with roll cages.

Generally, if it affects OTHER road users, there will be a law against it (reflectors, lights etc), but if it just affects you (bike must have 2 wheels, you must wear a helmet) then there's no law! 😉


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Actually, IIRC, the law says that bikes can't be [i]sold[/i] without bell and reflector if it is going to be used on road. There's nothing to say you can't take them off once you've paid.

Do some schools make helmets compulsory? Cos I can never understand why teenage folks ride round with a helmet dangling from their handlebars...


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Actually, the law is that you [i]must[/i] have pedal reflectors fitted while on the road.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:44 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I've got the kettle on if anyone fancies a brew?


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:45 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Do some schools make helmets compulsory? Cos I can never understand why teenage folks ride round with a helmet dangling from their handlebars...

Possibly, but I suspect some parents make it compulsory and kids think it's uncool and take it off en-route.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do some schools make helmets compulsory?

yeah they do - at the one our 12 year used to go to you needed a permit to ride to school & it was a condition


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:48 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I see quite a lot of adults in London riding along in traffic with the lid looped over the bars. Perhaps they think they look like dorks wearing them, and won't immediately die if they take them off? 😉


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 2:52 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Earl Grey and a nice Duchy Originals Lemon Shortbread, perchance?

CFH, you also been round my parents' house today? 🙂

I would quite like cycle lanes that are both in the road proper, and not full of broken glass and/or wet dead leaves.

I am considering putting those clickly plastic things that come with mrs julian's shimano pedals back on my commuter. I wonder how easy it would be to engineer in a couple of bits of reflector in most clipless pedals? (not eggbeaters I suppose) I don't recall any bit of the blurb that says how large said reflectors need to be.

As for helmets, I thing there has been at least 2 big threads on this since the new forum started. I cannot imagine there is anything left to add!


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:03 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[i]I cannot imagine there is anything left to add! [/i]

You don't get what this "internet" thing is for, do you? 😉


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

lol


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Waste of time to bring in any new legislation - when was the last time anyone was done for not obeying old legislation regarding reflectors, bells etc etc?

The feds around here are too busy sitting in car parks doing undercover surveillance on a nice Saturday afternoon too worry about cyclists.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 13265
Full Member
 

I'm a teacher type and for my sins was once given the job of "running" the bike shed (that meant something so different when I was a kid!) and encouraging cycling to school. Given the job because I was a cyclist and still young enough at the time to be seen as cool.

Wearing your helmet is a pretty standard part of the code of practise that goes with most Bike-to-school authorisation policies, but as you say a large percentage avoid it at all costs. One particularly larey lad managed to total himself by getting the helmet straps stuck in his wheel on the way into school. Didn't look so cool then!


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:19 pm
Posts: 3157
Free Member
 

Today's Guardian has a nice article explaining why:
[url] http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/may/07/cycling-safety-york-calderdale [/url]

"Struck by the Dutch success, a group of British MPs has just returned from a fact-finding trip to the country. There, along with reams of information about bike lanes and secure parking, they were let in to a less well-known secret for spurring a national cycling culture: throw out the Lycra and the helmets."


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

julianwilson, no, but the cameras are working a treat now.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SC - love the links these two paras made me laugh so much tea came out of my nose!!

A study of the most and least safe places to cycle in Britain, released today, shows that where there are more riders on the roads there is generally a lower accident rate, while in areas less popular for bikes, cycling can be notably more risky.
- Making where I live on a nice Sunday the safest place to cycle in the world (ignoring the regular ambulances and air ambulance!!)

And then, of course, there is the factor that no government directive can change: topography. Like Holland, the areas of England favoured by cyclists also tend to be the flatter ones.
Not round here you clot, the only flat bits we have are at the very bottom of the hills and at the very top, either side of them it is all up or down and you cant move for bikes!!!

No Helmets, let Dariwnism rule. 😀


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 3:36 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
 

If people do or don't want to wear helmets it should be up to them (personally I do about 75% of the time). I can't see why folk continually want to impose their own values on other people's lives.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]I see quite a lot of adults in London riding along in traffic with the lid looped over the bars. Perhaps they think they look like dorks wearing them, and won't immediately die if they take them off?[/i]

This is brilliant. Are they all blokes? I can just imagine the sad buggers leaving the house in the morning, wife and children waving them off and then as soon as they're round the corner they rip it off with a sigh of relief because they don't look cool.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 4:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not read the article but did they consider that maybe less people cycle in those areas because its so dangerous?


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Mostly blokes samuri, yes. 🙂


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 5:15 pm
Posts: 19
Free Member
 

Myth no 1) You do not have to have a bell fitted to a bike, it only has to be sold with one for BS 6102

Myth no 2) You are only required to have a rear and pedal reflectors on a bike for road use, however to conform to BS 6102 a cycle must be sold with front, rear, pedal and wheel reflectors.

Making helmet wearing law is daft as a vast amount of people would just stop cycling.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 5:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.ctc.org.uk/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=4688 ]CTC position on cycle helmets[/url]

I think the stuff linked to on that page sums up pretty well the argument against helmet compulsion


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 5:32 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

I see quite a lot of adults in London riding along in traffic with the lid looped over the bars. Perhaps they think they look like dorks wearing them, and won't immediately die if they take them off?

I know one adult male who is often photographs riding into work with his helmet looped over his bars. Not recently, of course, as he's had his bike nicked again.

🙂


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 5:35 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

An Ozzy doctor recently devised a spreadsheet that would calculate the health [u]costs[/u] of making helmets compulsory.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 5:35 pm
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

A good thick beanie works well in the winter. A baseball cap suffices in summer. No helmets for this old codger.


 
Posted : 07/05/2009 6:47 pm