Home Forums Bike Forum What's needed versus what's actually recommended

  • This topic has 13 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by igm.
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • What's needed versus what's actually recommended
  • joolsburger
    Free Member

    It's an old chestnut I'm going to ask here.

    I started MTB on a rigid bike, moved to a hardtail and since 1996 have had a short travel FS bike.

    My FS bike just broke. So here I am at something of a crossroads. I could shell out a grand or so on a new FS frame (most likely a Moorewood), I could get a second hand FS fame off the bay for 500 quid or so, Blur, heckler or some such.

    I could go back to my roots and get most likely a steel hardtail was looking at the charge but have some more ideas after a recent thread.

    I ride all over the UK but mostly down South on singletrack/doubletrack in the woods. Once in a blue moon I go to the Alps or some kind of trail centre.

    I have always had my bike set up very stiff (perhaps a leftover from my hardtail days).

    I'm pushing 40 but seem to have become much faster and more risk taking as I've got older. I often get airbourne and I like a nice drop off!

    So do I go for a FS because that's the way things have evolved or as I suspect will I be just as happy on a nice hardtail with some fat tyres and a long seatpost?

    Money isn't really the thing to be honest, although I like value.

    So in short for 99% of my riding I reckon really all I need is a hardtail or am I wrong?

    clubber
    Free Member

    You're wrong.

    Next Q

    😉

    joolsburger
    Free Member

    OK, Why? I've done FS for 12 years now.

    ltheisinger
    Free Member

    I'm pushing 40 but seem to have become much faster and more risk taking as I've got older. I often get airbourne and I like a nice drop off!

    ^^^^^^……Mmmm…..hardtail? Not sure about that?

    I am pushing 40 too and I also like a bit of risk (although just come to blows doing that and foot has now been in plaster for 14 weeks 🙁 ) & it sounds like you take part in the type of mountain bike activities to me in roughly the same area (South) – I have just bought a New Santa Cruz Heckler….

    All Mountain Bike is the way to go IMO. 5/6" rear travel with something like a Fox RP23 rear shock and 140mm (ish) up front, maybe something like 'Pikes' which are adjustable from 95mm to 140mm?

    Although, I suppose it just comes down to personal preference??!!

    james
    Free Member

    Just to confuse you further, how about a softail? For that little bit of give at the rear, with a 'full size' travel fork

    clubber
    Free Member

    Just kidding. You're absolutely right. I've done this in the past (replacing full susser with hardtail) and for most people a hardtail is absolutely fine for the riding they do. Of course that doesn't mean a full susser isn't nice and I currently have three full susser frames (two built up as bikes) just because I picked them up cheap enough (£100ish each) on here to make it no more expensive than a hardtail.

    joolsburger
    Free Member

    mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmoooots

    Dribble.

    See I reckon rightly or not that my jumpbike is a 24 inch hardtail and so for air FS is not required.

    I am seriously getting to think that it would be more fun getting kicked about a bit rather than just floating down the trails in my big FS armchair. Also a steel hardtail could have been bloody fixed!

    Scienceofficer
    Free Member

    one of each.

    joolsburger
    Free Member

    I'm a one bike kind of bloke. I share the jumpy bike with the boy!

    ampthill
    Full Member

    If you've owned a full suspension bike and still don't know how am I suposed to work it out from a couple of test rides

    The problem is that it all down to personal preference isn't it. Nothing harder then knowing your own mind

    At the moment I'm in a steel hard tail mood

    I do have the advantage that whatever I buy should be better than my current bike

    Old Orange gringo with v brakes and 70mm forks. But since I went for a short stem amd Mary bars I'v loved every ride on it

    I really thought an Anthem X was the one for me but i had a dreadful test ride at Bike Radar. It was mainly down to suspension set up (they pumped it up way to hard) but it flt a bit twitchy and steep to me.

    s8tannorm
    Free Member

    Just buy a steel hardtail … it's the way forward 😉

    james
    Free Member

    Or buy a steel and carbon hardtail? Supposed to be more comfy than their normal steel hardtail. £425 isn't ridiculous either

    (Pipedream Brewmaster btw)

    or a Ti hardtail or ..

    Digger90
    Free Member

    I'm 45 and started riding in 1990. in 1996 I got my first FS and since then I've gone back to hardtail twice )Fat Chance Yo Eddy the first time, On One 456 most recently).

    I think i've got hardtails out of my system now – the 456 was fun but frankly was just awful compared to my Turner Flux.

    I certainly won't be going back to a hardtail anytime soon.

    igm
    Full Member

    Nahh. Sounds like you want a 456 carbon (or settle for the Ti if you can't wait)(or the steel if it's in, for about £150 new, less if you find a second hand one)

    Does everything my Five does, but with less comfort (and therefore not quite so good on very long days)

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

The topic ‘What's needed versus what's actually recommended’ is closed to new replies.