• This topic has 33 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by toby1.
Viewing 34 posts - 1 through 34 (of 34 total)
  • What slow cooker?
  • Dorset_Knob
    Free Member

    As title really. A slow cooker is needed – what’s good, what’s bad, any experiences etc?

    … asking for a friend 😉

    edit: Thanks!

    Stoner
    Free Member

    Theyre v basic machines. I wouldnt spend a fortune on one.

    I have one of these.

    Nice and big (possibly too big if you’re not batch cooking for the freezer and just feeding 2 people) 5.5L

    https://www.argos.co.uk/product/4232764

    £25. Not enough cash to get twitchy about. The bowl is heavy but thats good to dissipate the heat from the heater element. v recyclable when/if it breaks or dies. Ceramic smashed up into landfill, metal in recycling with glass lid.

    ElVino
    Full Member

    One that you can take the bowl out and put on the hob so probably metal bowl and not ceramic. This really saves the wash up as things really need to be hot going on the slow cooker. Also at the end sometimes you want to whack it back on the hob at the end to evaporate some liquid quickly to thicken sauce.

    Also think about size. we have a family of five and ours is way too big in my opinion, they don’t work brilliantly 1/3 or less full.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    A nice small square shape one, so that once you realise they’re a bit shit, you can fit it on that shelf in the cupboard next to the bread maker and the nutribullet. 🙂

    newworldlobster
    Free Member

    instantpot duo. Works as a pressure cooker or slow cooker.

    johndoh
    Free Member

    We have a *big* Russell Hobbs one and it’s great – I use it once or twice a week most weeks – for pulled pork chilli, ragu sauce and even for cooking the chicken for Sunday dinner – put an extra large chicken (resting on tin foil balls so it doesn’t end up cooking in a bath of its own juices) in first thing Sunday morning on the high setting with the usual seasoning then turn it down to low after a couple of hours, leave it and get on with my day. Then at about 4.30pm I can get back in from a  day out with the family and do the roasties/Yorkshires etc in the oven without fighting for space.

    After Sunday dinner (and after I have picked the carcass apart) I use the remaining stuff to slow cook a stock overnight.

    I think anyone that says they won’t be used can’t really be that used to cooking much fresh stuff / be bothered about making the most from their food.

    Stoner
    Free Member

    jd – do you give the chicken a skin sizzle in the oven at the beginning or end of cooking?

    johndoh
    Free Member

    Stoner – I don’t bother as no-one is bothered about skin in our house.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    I think anyone that says they won’t be used can’t really be that used to cooking much fresh stuff / be bothered about making the most from their food.

    All our food is home cooked, I just don’t find the slow cooker any more convenient, or any better than the oven, that’s all.

    And we don’t eat much meat really either.

    Stoner
    Free Member

    *scratches johndoh off approved culinary advisers list*

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    #oystersandskinforthewin

    rene59
    Free Member

    Another vote for just use the oven. Oven has timer, I can specify start/stop times and I have a cast iron casserole dish that can be used for this and other tasks. A dedicated slow cooker would just be a waste of space.

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    I bought a cheap generic one from Tesco, it works wonderfully, better than my Mum’s Crock-pot one, which admittedly was expensive either.

    I generally detest cooking gadgets, but they’re actually brilliant. It’s easy, but labour saving isn’t really the point of them.

    I personally will never use any kind of minced meat in them again though, that DID NOT work well.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    We bought the large Digital Crock Pot thats on the Which? recommendations.  About £35 IIRC, it works well.

    toby1
    Full Member

    I love my cheap Russell Hobbs one, but the non stick coating has easily scratched and is now rusting, so I should probably replace it.

    As for those using the oven as an alternative, surely leaving that running at 100-120 is far more costly on energy than just heating the container within the slowcooker?

    IHN
    Full Member

    I currently have a spicy lamb hotpot thing going in a cheap Morphy Richards one from Argos. As someone has said, having one with metal innards means you can do any frying off beforehand in it on the hob and just whack it into the slow-cooker bit after.

    Oh, and it’s red, to match the kettle.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    As for those using the oven as an alternative, surely leaving that running at 100-120 is far more costly on energy than just heating the container within the slowcooker?

    How very predictable, well done you.

    binners
    Full Member

    Ours is also red and matches both the kettle and the toaster. I can’t remember what make it is but it cooks food. Slowly

    IHN
    Full Member

    We don’t have a toaster, we use the one in the oven, which is probably far more costly on energy.

    johndoh
    Free Member

    All our food is home cooked, I just don’t find the slow cooker any more convenient, or any better than the oven, that’s all.

    There are some great slow cooker curry recipes using pulses.

    simon_g
    Full Member

    +1 for instantpot. But we use ours more as a pressure cooker than slow – still handy to have both in one IMO.

    Kahurangi
    Full Member

    more costly on energy

    is it more costly on energy to run an oven or is it more costly to produce and transport an additional piece of hardware?

    honest question that I do not expect any of us to answer!

    stevenmenmuir
    Free Member

    We have the red Morphy Richards sear and stew.  Had it about a month, use it once a week.  I think we’ll continue to use it, probably using it more at the weekends as mornings during the week are pretty hectic.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    Johndoh, I’d get flung out the house if I ate lentil curry! 🙂

    kerley
    Free Member

    We have 2 as we buy heart, wild boar, wild rabbit etc,. for dogs.  We use them in the garage though as the 6 hours of smell while cooking isn’t great.  The ceramic one is better.

    As above they are pretty basic so should need to spend much.

    zzjabzz
    Free Member

    I have a cheapo 3.5l one that feeds myself and my two boys adequately. Only really do beef casseroles in it. Pulled pork was a failure, plus I like it a bit burned and I like proper crackling so that is an oven-only job.

    Everything goes in cold. For me, it totally misses the point if you’re sealing meat prior to putting it in the slow cooker or messing about with hobs and ovens either side of the cook. No one’s ever been ill.

    Great if you need a ten hour or so cook from morning to evening because of work, but I’m in for 2pm most days so would generally casserole in the oven or on the hob for a 6pm tea.

    It’s a lifestyle choice I suppose, and a cheap one at that. If it fits, do it…

    grantyboy
    Free Member

    I use a cheap one from Aldi which has a metal pot so you can brown meat off on the hob and saves faffing about with other pans, really makes cooking a one pan deal which for me means I use it more.

    I also use a cheap timer on it, the sort you’d use on lights if you went on holiday.  This has been really good as it’s now timer controlled

    blader1611
    Free Member

    I watched a chef recently who said that anybody who says they are “sealing” meat is talking rubbish. Frying meat does not make it impermeable,its culinary nonesense (his words not mine). Quite a few slow cooker recipes ask for this to be done before using the slow cooker, i dont bother,it always tastes nice to me.

    Chicken has to be finished off in the oven though for crispy skin,its the law!

    rene59
    Free Member

    It might not seal the meat but browning it adds flavour and colour for any gravy or sauce.

    toby1
    Full Member

    How very predictable, well done you.

    Ooh, did I do something clever? Was a genuine question, but well done for the standard STW derision.

    honest question that I do not expect any of us to answer!

    I assume overall the construction of it probably isn’t better, but would running the cooker vs the slow cooker for a year would probably negate the cost of the slow cooker. As for whether the construction of a cast iron casserole dish would be better vs an electric slow cooker (again, not expecting stats and a full breakdown and as I own both it’s not really a concern), no idea!

    steve-g
    Free Member

    I thought that frying the meat quickly beforehand was to “sear” it not to “seal” it. I sometimes bother.

    Kuco
    Full Member

    I’ve got a Crock Pot had it for 9 years now and still going strong. Gets used a fair bit for currys,stews and chilli. I’ll often cook a chicken in it.

    captmorgan
    Free Member

    blader1611

    I watched a chef recently who said that anybody who says they are “sealing” meat is talking rubbish. Frying meat does not make it impermeable,its culinary nonesense (his words not mine). Quite a few slow cooker recipes ask for this to be done before using the slow cooker, i dont bother,it always tastes nice to me.

    Chicken has to be finished off in the oven though for crispy skin,its the law!

    he was wrong, it really is a thing

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maillard_reaction

    toby1
    Full Member

    I actually recently did my chicken chilli that I’d usually do in the slow cooker on the barbecue for 5 hours in a cast iron pan, no lid so the smoke got to it. It is possible that this is the best way of cooking ever and all other forms of cooking are pointless.

Viewing 34 posts - 1 through 34 (of 34 total)

The topic ‘What slow cooker?’ is closed to new replies.