- Web-based filth question
A spam-monger is barraging my hotmail account with intriguing emails. Today I had one offering to show me an entire indian tribe interfering with a horse, and “pert teens” having unnatural relations with, of all things, a monkey.
Now, I am pretty naive about the internet. Most of my consumption of lewd material involves buying pencil drawings of naked ladies from italian women on ebay, and I once downloaded a grainy 43-second video allegedly showing sexual intercourse onto my mobile telephone after paying £3 for the privilege.
I am aware that there is altogether racier material available on the internet, but are people really watching teens having intercourse with monkeys? And even if there are, why the hell does someone think I might be interested?
Seriously, the mind boggles.
😯Posted 9 years agoMosesMember
They don’t think you are interested. They think that perhaps one or two of the millions of people to whom they have sent the same spam, might be interested. They’re probably right.
Alternatively, someone’s analysed your interweb searches and put 2+2 together and gotten 56.
There’s enough free stuff out there for you to find without paying, – or so I’m told. 😕Posted 9 years agostuckinarutMember
2 men pleasuring a male pig and then impregnating a female pig
I stumbled across this one too.
I think it might have also been one of those ‘snuff movies’ coz the pig got it in the end, and I don’t think all that blood was special effects…
Shocking what gets on telly thesedays.Posted 9 years agoAnalogueAndyMember
I openend this thinking it was going to be about this new ‘extreme’ pornography law.
Interesting debate though.
Has the net revealed what we’ve always been or encouraged us to change?
Probably a bit of both*
There’s a list circulating somewhere entitled ‘Only in Porn’, you know the kind of thing..
I guess there has always been a danger that without being ‘taught’ or ‘learing through experience’ teenagers will grow up thinking your average ‘porn’ encounter is ‘normal’.
I’ve always thought it funny how porn reflects a country’s true physche i.e US = fake boobs,fake hair, fake ‘ooh yeah ride me baby’. German = gimp masks, nasty BDSM, urination etc!Posted 9 years agojimmySubscriber
I’ve chanced across horse porn before (OK, my mate bluetoothed it to me. On request). One was straight intercourse and the other was a bj ( both horse vs woman). Both made me feel quite ill, so if anyone is pulling themselves off over that kind of stuff I’m not going outside anymore. Also, the rumour is the girl who had sex with the horse apparently died from internal damage, just in case anyone was thinking of trying it… Of course it might just be a rumour to heighten the arousal of those weirdos chomping at the bit, so to speak.Posted 9 years agomiketuallySubscriber
In the dark old days of the internet, when you had to wait half an hour to download a new bra advert with Kylie in it, a friend sent me an incredibly detailed set of instructions on the best way to get jiggy with a horse. It was very well thought out, but I didn’t try it out.Posted 9 years ago
Andy has a very interesting point. I cannot now find a link, but I recall recently reading of a study that had been done involving a large number of men of relatively limited sexual experience being told to have sex with a woman (who I think was a porn actress who had been hired for the experiment). These chaps did not know they were being filmed or something. About 85% if memory serves wanted to ejaculate over the woman’s face or breasts. Apparently something like 20% of “normal” women are OK with that. I.E, the practice, while ubiquitous in pornography is not a mainstay of actual sex involving actual people. So maybe the monkey thing is not a necessary part of being a copmplete sexual being either…
🙂Posted 9 years ago
The topic ‘Web-based filth question’ is closed to new replies.