I don’t mind the ad, but then I don’t take a lot from it either. If it’s on the TV, it’s trying to either entertain you or sell you something and the two aren’t mutually exclusive.
As others have said, Gillette will have known fine well that their add would cause some controversy especially in the US, but marketing for a large company isn’t interested in the now, it’s interested in the future. So perhaps reacting to we’re losing sales at the bottom end to Harry’s Razors. What’s the demographic of those we’ve lost? Without slashing price to compete, are we ever going to get them back? No – okay, we need to move the marketplace. What about an ad which cements our position with a demographic who doesn’t care so much about price, but about perceived quality and ease of supply and image?
It’s now just a numbers game – X% offended (the demographic you’re already losing) vs. y% approval (the demographic you’re targeting). Are they close? Yes = run the ad. Maybe = Probably still run the Ad. No – don’t run the Ad.
Simple.
In my view, you can still be a man without being an oaf.