Home Forums Chat Forum Watches N+1…

  • This topic has 9,499 replies, 424 voices, and was last updated 1 day ago by dmorts.
Viewing 40 posts - 8,281 through 8,320 (of 9,500 total)
  • Watches N+1…
  • Kryton57
    Full Member

    Me too.  Looks better with lume  😉

    IMG_5074

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    ^^^

    That Ben 10 version looks nicer! 🙂

    Blazin-saddles
    Full Member

    Just go to show beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  I’m another that think most G-shocks look better in the box (with a lid on) than on a wrist.

    RustyNissanPrairie
    Full Member

    Me too. Looks better with lume

    Nah still looks shit.

    4
    IvanDobski
    Free Member

    “but they are actually very good watches for the purpose they were created”

    I’d argue that for the vast majority of the range, if not all of it, that’s simply not true.
    They’re bulky, awkward, sweaty/plastic-ey, have poor legibility day or night and are fiddly to use.

    They’re not, imo, a practical watch for actual use. Instead they’re a watch which is designed to look like a practical ruffty tuffty watch for people who don’t think too deeply about how they’re going to use them.

    This is the watch hill upon which I’ll die.

    Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

    1
    walowiz
    Full Member

    @TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR

    “I only wear my G shocks (have six) occasionally now – usually have a Samsung smart watch on my wrist. This will likely be my next watch though”

    I have the 2nd gen Epix & it’s possibly the best watch I’ve owned. Couldn’t quite justify the pro cost and then the 2nd gen Epix came up recently for £374. Love it, screen is brilliant – big improvement over the Fenix.

    IMG_1786

    neilnevill
    Free Member

    No. Lume, no lume, makes no difference.  Its still no.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    You know you don’t have to buy, wear or look at it Neil, right?  😂

    1
    neilnevill
    Free Member

    I am trying to help you.   You’ll thank me in time

    2
    mr edd
    Free Member

    First dip into this post. And as someone
    mentioned Timex I got this as a Christmas present to myself.

    Perhaps £50 over priced but just needed to scratch a snoopy watch itch 😁

    but they are actually very good watches for the purpose they were created

    What pray tell is that purpose?

    CountZero
    Full Member

    @IvanDobski – my opinion of the greater majority of G-Shock succinctly summed up. I have one, an analogue one that cost about £75, and that I found some adaptors for to take a NATO/ZULU strap. Problem is it gains a lot, and can’t be wound back, only forward. Very……..very……..very……..very……..slowly. 🙄
    Shame, really, because it’s fairly compact, simple and fairly legible.

    it’s a definite no, it looks terrible. The sort of thing to go with tactical torches etc.

    A decent tactical flashlight is actually simple and useful, the main defining feature is the instant on/off tailcap button – I’ve got a couple and they’re not generally that expensive. Unlike the G-Shock Mud Man, which is unspeakably ugly! 😝

    They’re not, imo, a practical watch for actual use. Instead they’re a watch which is designed to look like a practical ruffty tuffty watch for people who don’t think too deeply about how they’re going to use them.

    What ‘actual use’ are you using your watch for out of interest?

    They are designed to be tough, not ‘look’ tough

    Who tf thinks deeply about how they are going to use a watch?

    IvanDobski
    Free Member

    No, they’re designed to look tough. They could be equally as tough but look substantially less g-shock.

    CountZero
    Full Member

    Found a group photo of most of my watches, and my two cheap Casios are on the far left and right. The one on the right is my cheapest watch, I bought it for my stepdad, it cost less than £20, and I was able to mod a ZULU strap to fit it. It’s an extremely good time keeper, too, amazingly! The SPORK still has the ‘sharkskin’ mesh strap it had on for donks, but I prefer the original bracelet. Above it is a Seiko 5 with a polished case and bezel and Yokobies fleiger-style face and hands, which I’m pretty sure preceded my purchase of the SPORK.

    I find it a bit small to wear now, TBH. It’s a shame that G-Shock is such a royal PITA to adjust, I like it to wear. ☹️

    No, they’re designed to look tough

    Well, if we are splitting hairs, you said they were designed to “look like”

    Anyway

    My six G’s, the bottom one being the first I bought as a cheap work beater – did it’s job admirably. Battery died ages ago and I never replaced it.

    To the right, Victorinox Inox and my old Samsung that gets used as a beater when I don’t want to wear my new one. By absolute pure coincidence – the battery in the Inox is dead and I unknowingly took the pic when it was showing the right time (almost)

    51417915160_e20ed7a62a_k

    IvanDobski
    Free Member

    @CountZero – what do you think of the MWC?

    What pray tell is that purpose?

    To get watch snobs frothing….

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Now you see, this is where YMMV comes in.   As much as I appreciate the “why” for the Snoopy, I’d never wear a watch with a cartoon on it, even if it was an Omega.

    Equally, smartwatches are a no for me with the exception of the one I use for Sports activity tracking and specifically that purpose.

    An interesting couple of days its been for sure.

    To get watch snobs frothing….

    😂

    Equally, smartwatches are a no for me with the exception of the one I use for Sports activity tracking and specifically that purpose.

    Same, learned that lesson the hard way once. On tour couldn’t charge it, needed a watch, looked like a plank. Ended up using my Garmin Foretrex until I could get a replacement.

    The best watch I ever had for work was an issue G10 from CWC. Bombproof and reliable, also easy to sync for tasks.

    gravedigger
    Free Member

    Unworn Seiko Alpinist SARB017 on Ebay :

    SARB017

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/225922052216

    higgo
    Free Member

    £960??? I wish I’d kept mine now. Sold for £240 in 2016.

    (I also sold an SBCJ013 Alpinist for £380 in 2016 – I wonder what that would fetch now)

    RustyNissanPrairie
    Full Member

    IvanDobski
    Free Member

    @CountZero
    – what do you think of the MWC


    @ivandobski

    I’ve had one and it was a bit….meh🤷‍♂️
    The crystal scratched easily and quite badly, the PVD coating wore through fairly easily on the contact points.
    I’m am engineer though and am hard on watches, Seiko5 Sports are stronger / harder wearing.

    IvanDobski
    Free Member

    Bit disappointing, I was idly thinking of a tritium-tubed beater and they seemed to sit between the Nites and the no-name AliExpress options. Cheers for the info though.

    1
    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Decision made.  There can be only one….

    IMG_5076

    boblo
    Free Member

    That’s a bit better 👍

    Noice. 🤌🏻

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Yeah the only chunky beater in the collection.

    IvanDobski
    Free Member

    Yes, that’s much better!

    1
    neilnevill
    Free Member

    Thankfully he came to his senses 

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Who needs a G anyway, I just realised I left this outside on the windowsill to charge before I sell it … 10 days ago!  Rain, sleet snow, -2 and our visiting magpie aside, it’s all fine.

    IMG_5082

    Bullet
    Full Member

    A question for the watch mechanism experts. What would cause an automatic watch to have the rotor spin when winding it manually? The winder feels stiff as well. Does from unwound and stopped as well as partially wound.

    Kato
    Full Member

    ETA 2824?  Sounds like the reverser and it’s a common problem. They don’t like to be hand wound and will eventually break.   My Tissot Visodate is sick with the same thing.  Rotor will turn when winding and it’s rough to wind.  In fact my old Tudor BB41 was fixed under warranty with the same issue

    Bullet
    Full Member

    It’s a CW C60 Trident so a Sellita movement I think. Only 7 months old and CW are sorting it under warranty so no issue with their customer service. Just wondered what the cause might be (what’s a reverser?)

    Blazin-saddles
    Full Member

    Bullet – don’t expect to see it back anytime soon.  I sent my c1000 elite back for a similar sounding issue when it was 2 months old, took them 6 months to fix it and send back!  Didn’t get a single message from customer service other than “we’ve received it” until it arrived back.  It didn’t even have a compliments slip or report of what was wrong when it came back, just the watch and a new COSC certificate.

    Bullet
    Full Member

    That doesn’t sound promising 😕

    walowiz
    Full Member

    Am looking at getting a beater watch as all my current collection are too good to get worn whilst working, I’m after a simple face, with numbers, good lume and just a clear watch face and automatic or solar.

    I want to spend less not more, any pointers, before I go trawling fleabay etc. ? Or has anyone on this thread got anything they’d like to move on ?

    No divers, or g shocks please, I’ve had g shocks before and whilst I do like them, I’ve not really got on with them.

    1
    Kato
    Full Member

    @Bullet yeah the Sellita is a clone of a 2824 and will have the same reverser issue.   When I comes back, don’t hand wind it past the just getting it going.

    If it makes you feel better Tudor had mine for 6 months as well.  Any watchmaker would be able to fix that issue fair easily though

    Blazin-saddles
    Full Member

    That doesn’t sound promising 😕

    i might have just caught them wrong, they fixed it foc and it’s been perfect ever since, I just expected a bit of customer service/updates.  I think mine must have gone back to Switzerland but will never know!

Viewing 40 posts - 8,281 through 8,320 (of 9,500 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.