• This topic has 11 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by grum.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Voyeuristic coverage of the floods?
  • ohnohesback
    Free Member

    Maybe it’s just me, but I think that this up to the knees in floodwater breathless reportage, and hosting programmes from the scene pratised by both the BbC and Sky news is pushing the boundaries of poor taste.

    johndoh
    Free Member

    It’s news. That’s what they do isn’t it? Or would it be better to just report from the studio with a few charcoal sketches?

    Trimix
    Free Member

    People love looking at other peoples misery. Generates traffic on websites that sells ad space.

    Thats the news business.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    Generates traffic on websites that sells ad space.

    Especially when someone starts another thread on a topic that’s already being well covered……

    soobalias
    Free Member

    i watch the news which i suppose encourages them.

    much like i clicked this thread.

    bigjim
    Full Member

    I think it’s getting hilarious now, just like when it snows and they have live reporters in a village filming people walking through 2 inches of snow, interviewing them about ‘how they are surviving’ and are they annoyed the council haven’t cleared their pavement yet?

    As evident from the other threads on the topic it is alarming how much nonsense people absorb from the news though.

    globalti
    Free Member

    Breathless? The BBC’s reporter Sima Kotecha was paddling around in a flood somewhere on the Thames this morning and was gasping for breath; I thought she must have run 100 yards or something.

    It’s not just news reporters.
    Bewdley seemed very busy yesterday for a cold wet February Sunday, presumably it was mostly tourists come to look at the floods.
    We went on a sightseeing trip ourselves on the tandem, stopping at a friend’s house to help lift the freezer and other furniture on to bricks as they’ve been told to expect water 8″ above floor level.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    The voyeurism is on the part of the public generally. News programmes simply pander to it.

    Dickyboy
    Full Member

    allows me to see just how bad my friends house is in Shepperton with me having to quiz her at this time 🙁

    kevj
    Free Member

    Presses turn off button.

    I may be classed as a non caring bastard, but the news has sanitised me to others mis-fortune.

    grum
    Free Member

    Trying to wean myself off news at the moment.

    http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

The topic ‘Voyeuristic coverage of the floods?’ is closed to new replies.