Home Forums Chat Forum This magazine's tedious political agenda.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 215 total)
  • This magazine's tedious political agenda.
  • Drac
    Full Member

    What would be embarrassing for Joe is if he’d used this forum to promote his own political agenda, say with a topic about his own little petition to keep those nasty foreigners from investing in property.

    oldejeans
    Free Member

    a fairly low quality bit of journalism

    ……..whereas the sun front page from the other day wasn’t?

    philxx1975
    Free Member

    I dont get it?

    2 things stand out

    1. It is a forum, people get hurt (emotionally)

    2. Once you discover the agenda stop reading.

    richc
    Free Member

    The article forgets to mention that Rubber may be more expensive but Hope products will potentially be cheaper. Aluminium will not be hit with such massive import duties.

    I think your logic is a bit off, the pound will be worth less than it is now so unless we process our own Aluminum the materials cost will go up, which will need to be passed onto the consumer.

    However wages should go down, due to the recession and the ability to remove some our employment rights foisted on us the EU; so that might offset the materials increase as I suspect materials are only a very small part of the cost.

    So if you still have a job, then yes Hope parts might be cheaper, and if you don’t have a job or a woman, or disabled or injured, or sick then I doubt you will care.

    buckster
    Free Member

    The quality of the air wont go down as the prevailing wind is North Easterly in my parts and so tends not to come from Europe(selfish I know).

    But I reckon he’d be right about the jobs, scarey that bit. I reckon MTB ‘guide’/ Ski chalet ‘slave’ will be low on the Brexit negotiating list.

    hebdencyclist
    Free Member

    OK I’ll have a go…

    pathetic self righteousness

    =Caring about other people

    constant prissiness about women in maxxis catalogues

    =Wanting women to be respected as equal to men

    trying to ram remain down our throats

    =Writing an opinion piece

    I’ll clarify the debate

    =Spout my own viewpoint under the guise of “common sense”

    effect

    80% of 11 year-olds can differentiate common homophones when spelling

    self-righteous left wing tabloid, I could go on the Guardian

    Guardian not a tabloid (and not very left wing, unless you’re Genghis Khan)

    cry myself fragile little self to sleep at night.

    Love how “cry myself to sleep” wasn’t emphatic enough; when proofreading, OP decided to add “fragile little” for a bit of added hyperbole.

    3/10 – no shouty capitals, nothing about immigrants.

    gofasterstripes
    Free Member

    What would be embarrassing for Joe is if he’d used this forum to promote his own political agenda, say with a topic about his own little petition to keep those nasty foreigners from investing in property.

    footflaps
    Full Member

    What would be embarrassing for Joe is if he’d used this forum to promote his own political agenda, say with a topic about his own little petition to keep those nasty foreigners from investing in property.

    He’d never do such a thing would he?

    He comes across as such a reasonable well balanced kind of person.

    Still he’s up this month’s “jambalaya best ignorance of the facts” award: http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/anders-breivik-makes-the-case-for-brexit

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Clickbaity headline but the article’s more reasoned. Smog sounds like bollocks.

    I’m sure people would respond to the BPW/7 Stanes part “But we could spend the £350m on that instead”. But the UK governments are not investing in trails, in fact they’re cutting back. I see nothing to suggest that’d change.

    Drac – Moderator

    What would be embarrassing for Joe is if he’d used this forum to promote his own political agenda, say with a topic about his own little petition to keep those nasty foreigners from investing in property.

    It’s not really a “nasty foreigners” thing that, property speculation is a huge problem regardless of who it is that’s doing it.

    scotia
    Free Member

    joe – did you read the article?

    singletrack has the right to write journalism..its a little bit their job..

    i live in switzerland, so we are not in the eu… and i tell you its a pain in the arse for alot of things.. silly little things, but also work wise it aint so great..!

    oh and prissiness re: maxxis girls? really? you find that kind of thing ok? i applaud stw’s approach to that..

    richc
    Free Member

    Smog seems tenuous; but they are right EU regulations have made beaches much cleaner around by me.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    Well one thing is for sure, the politicians aren’t going to give us any facts to works with. No that would never do. The prols having meaningful information on which to base a decision? Ha!

    milky1980
    Free Member

    The front page article in question actually highlights my reasons for voting Stay whereas all the other stuff gives me reasons to vote Leave. It’s why I’m currently undecided as mountain biking here in Wales has gained an awful lot from EU membership.
    If it wasn’t for EU funding Afan/Glyncorrwg would be unknown to most riders and any mention of CYB would me met with quizzical looks. The industrial unit used by Mojo and the previous home of Loco were built using EU grants, I don’t know if they would have found alternative homes but a ready supply of cheap units probably helped. Without this base of Trail Centres and local MTB-based businesses would BPW or Antur Stiniog come into existence? BPW might but on a smaller scale (no big building probably) so would not be the same.

    It was actually nice to read an article that stuck to facts without throwing mud around the place.

    dragon
    Free Member

    singletrack has the right to write journalism..its a little bit their job..

    Hard to call that article journalism, take the first point about the EHIC card it isn’t a substitute for travel insurance. From the NHS website:

    The EHIC is not an alternative to travel insurance. It will not cover any private medical healthcare or costs, such as mountain rescue in ski resorts, being flown back to the UK, or lost or stolen property. It is also not valid on cruises.

    ninfan
    Free Member

    Everyone knows that the good Contis are the ones made in Germany. If we end up with the EU slapping trade tariffs on us, the price of things made in the EU will go up.

    PJM1974
    Free Member

    And without the right to paid holiday – won in a large part thanks to the EU, fewer of us would be seen on the trails during the week.

    I may be speculating here, but anyone else case to argue the toss that that our evil Tory overlords aren’t slavering over the prospect of rewriting the legislation to force us to work harder, in return for less?

    Perhaps, post Brexit the trails around Wales might be a tad quieter during those dry Summer weekdays?

    Northwind
    Full Member

    dragon – Member

    Hard to call that article journalism, take the first point about the EHIC card it isn’t a substitute for travel insurance

    The article doesn’t say it is; in fact it discusses insurance too.

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    Hope products will potentially be cheaper. Aluminium will not be hit with such massive import duties.

    Cheaper if you’re buying from abroad, more expensive if you’re buying with pounds in the UK.

    Drac
    Full Member

    It’s not really a “nasty foreigners” thing that, property speculation is a huge problem regardless of who it is that’s doing it.

    I thought the humour would be obvious. I guess not.

    richc
    Free Member

    About 13 million women in work are protected from discrimination as a result of equality legislation; 340,000 women receive paid maternity leave each year in the UK. In addition, 1.6 million people on temporary contracts now have the same rights as permanent workers. That’s an awful lot of people protected, and yet the Brexiters scoff at those rights.

    The employment minister, Priti Patel, a prominent Tory Brexiter, has called them a burden and would like to halve them. Boris Johnson said it was “very disappointing” that Britain had not made “changes to employment law”, complaining that we “need to weigh in on all that stuff, all that social chapter stuff”.
    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/06/leave-campaign-workers-rights-brexiters-british

    Boris has already talked about a bonfire of rights and Gove *loves* pro-business reform.

    As I’ve said before Turkey’s voting for Christmas…

    Stoner
    Free Member

    If we end up with the EU slapping trade tariffs on us, the price of things made in the EU will go up. Oh, and step away from the rosebikes.de site, that stuff will only get held at customs and you’ll have to pay import duty (as with packages from the US).

    A bundle of non-sequiturs and lack of understanding of duty tariff there…

    It does not automatically follow that an EU tariff on goods IMPORTED into the EU from UK will lead to reciprocal tariffs on all goods going the other way. Tariffs are often product class specific.

    Also, in the absence of a trade agreement, the likelihood is that any tariffs on imports TO the UK FROM EU might attract the default World Trade 4% duty rate (as we do for US goods)

    Not to mention that the UK would be in a position to then reduce it’s VAT as it sees fit (which it cant do now). A highly regressive tax. Even when applied to carbon MTBS 🙂

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    The EHIC is not an alternative to travel insurance. It will not cover … lost or stolen property.

    Anyone who thought the European health care insurance also covered their bags getting nicked is a special kind of stupid. 😀

    footflaps
    Full Member

    As I’ve said before Turkey’s voting for Christmas…

    very much so, the low paid will lose rights and be worse off post Brexit – a double whammy. The rich will carry on being rich and the rest of us will muddle through.

    Stoner
    Free Member

    my EHIC wasnt much help this winter when I ran over my own thumb with my skis in Morzine. The town clinic is a private one so I had to pay for it myself and it’s not recoverable.

    rickmeister
    Full Member

    So, can anyone explain which parts of that article aren’t true?

    Probably the bits with “might” “unlikely” or “could” as opposed to “will”

    So thats:
    1. Visiting Europe
    2. The Guiding Job
    5. Smog
    6. BPW
    7. Regulations

    Passport control at Gretna …. really ?

    One of the few Brexit certainties is 2 yrs of uncertainties / negotiations…

    ransos
    Free Member

    my EHIC wasnt much help this winter when I ran over my own thumb with my skis in Morzine.

    Is that because stupidity is excluded? 😉

    Leku
    Free Member

    Not to mention that the UK would be in a position to then reduce it’s VAT as it sees fit.

    Except our books still don’t balance so tax cuts are unlikely (cat in hells chance).

    dragon
    Free Member

    EHIC card is such a red herring, I mean do you not go mtbing elsewhere in the world e.g. USA, just because they don’t have one or similar?

    1. Visiting Europe – pretty much irrelevant point
    2. The Guiding Job – brexit would impact here no doubt
    5. Smog – rubbish
    6.BPW – yes EU funds were used to build, would a UK government fund similar in future that is unknown.
    7. Regulations – impossible to say IMO. The UK have brought in some regs before the EU and in fact in some cases the EU ones are simply blander versions of the original UK one, other case are the other way around. For me I don’t think this is clear cut either way.

    Stoner
    Free Member

    Is that because stupidity is excluded?

    and rightly so. No one should have to subsidise my clutziness.

    footflaps
    Full Member

    my EHIC wasnt much help this winter when I ran over my own thumb with my skis in Morzine. The town clinic is a private one so I had to pay for it myself and it’s not recoverable.

    I put a ski through my shin (to the bone) in Zermatt. 350 Euros for 3 stitches and a Tetanus jab!

    thomthumb
    Free Member

    when I ran over my own thumb with my skis in Morzine

    like some kind of middle class Brian Harvey!

    Stoner
    Free Member

    well we’ve ascertained that at least two of us shouldnt be allowed on snow unaccompanied.

    However, for those who’ve not yet tried out their EHIC card in anger, an illustration that’s it’s not quite the same as rocking up at UK A&E with a brake lever in your thigh and getting a free new leg.

    clodhopper
    Free Member

    “like some kind of middle class Brian Harvey!”

    😆

    He drove over his own head! 😮

    BoardinBob
    Full Member

    footflaps
    Full Member

    However, for those who’ve not yet tried out their EHIC card in anger, an illustration that’s it’s not quite the same as rocking up at UK A&E with a brake lever in your thigh and getting a free new leg.

    To be fair as we’re leading Europe in Diabetes, we’re going to have a huge pile of spare legs knocking about after all the amputations, so giving them away free is cost neutral to the NHS….

    BigJohn
    Full Member

    So which way do I have to vote if I don’t want to have to swap my brake levers over?

    fin25
    Free Member

    How angry are you gonna be when they do the “7 reasons brexit will be good for MTB” article later on?

    (Though we all know they prob wont)

    mogrim
    Full Member

    So which way do I have to vote if I don’t want to have to swap my brake levers over?

    Presumably Brexit, I can only imagine the current setting is due to some kind of bureaucratic decree handed down from Brussels like the rest of the laws in the UK. Somewhat of a paradoxical situation, vote exit and you’ll be like the rest of Europe before you know it!

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    So which way do I have to vote if I don’t want to have to swap my brake levers over?

    #fixieit

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 215 total)

The topic ‘This magazine's tedious political agenda.’ is closed to new replies.