Should shorten most threads by at least 42.764% and improve others by a clear and majestic 27.97362% while bringing at least 38.9278% of threads more to life than using normal conditioner.

😆 True true …

Believing in science too much you might as well hang yourself.

What is the probability of that!

2, 3, 5, 7 & 10 on the car insurance thread. Although i am responsible for a couple of those!

Actually would threads not just die on their arses with no one bothered to justify each point with a spread of peer-reviewed randomised double blind trials because it was more fun to post silly pictures of narwhals etc?

Needs something on misrepresentative statistics – although I accept that’s probably the most difficult thing to spot, and could probably have a whole top 10 all of it’s own.

Source?

8 and 9
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC300808/pdf/32701459.pdf