I watched the game on the box, and of course the crowd (inside the ground – what happened outside is a different matter) was loud, partisan and ‘hostile’ but I didn’t see anything that I’d consider untoward – it’s as you’d expect a home crowd to be and it’s why it’s called home advantage and why these ties are two-legged affairs. Since the dawn of time people have talked about quietening the home fans early on, you don’t do that by making two defensive errors one after another and conceding a goal after 10 minutes, of course you get what you get after that!
In fact, I’d deny that because the crowd quietened in the second half City came more into it; it’s because City controlled the second half that the crowd quietened. In the first half Liverpool pressed hard, particularly at turnovers; pressured right up to Ederson forcing him to kick long and out of play at times, and of course the crowd responded.
I don’t think the officials were intimidated; they may have made errors but all do, and they also made some fine decisions. You always feel it’s against you when you’ve been humped 3-0, look at your own faults and mistakes not to others.
City’s home leg to come, get an early goal and it’ll be a fine tie, and it’s up to your team and fans to put the pressure back on.
FWIW I don’t see the press, not even the MEN suggesting the ground was anything but partisan or the officials being poor – take the blinkers off.
[edit – FWIW I have Liverpool as MARGINAL favourites at this stage – but we know how liable they are to defensive implosions, I don’t think they can keep City out for 135 minutes and one goal makes a huge difference, and City are an amazing attacking team]