Viewing 21 posts - 1 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • Slackish 120-130mm trail bike?
  • banjowhacker
    Free Member

    Other than Whyte, who makes a slackish (say 67-68 degree head angle) trail bike, less than 140mm travel?
    just wondering.

    oink
    Free Member
    honourablegeorge
    Full Member
    getonyourbike
    Free Member

    Santa Cruz TRC

    z1ppy
    Full Member

    2012 Scott Spark 120mm with a 68 or 68.7 degree head angle.

    stumpy01
    Full Member

    MBR have a preview of the 2012 Fuel EX and apparently that’s getting a 1 degree slacker head angle over the current one. From 68 – 67 degrees I think.

    B.A.Nana
    Free Member

    New Ragley 100/140 sounds like it will be slack and low.

    DaveyBoyWonder
    Free Member

    As above, those new Treks look absolutely lovely!

    banjowhacker
    Free Member

    Hmm… Yes. Those new Treks and Scotts look just the ticket.

    kudos100
    Free Member

    Chumba xcl

    groundskeeperwilly
    Free Member

    Yeti ASR 5 is 68degree with a 120mm Fork

    dickie
    Free Member

    I really like this;

    ruscle
    Free Member

    Yep Yeti ASR-5 all the way, I run mine with 140mm Talas so even more of a slack head angle.

    CheesybeanZ
    Full Member

    orange 5 runs great at 120

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Something reasonably short, with a Works Components angle reducer stuck in it?

    5lab
    Full Member

    i’ve got a mythic (banshee) wildcard. Fits your requirements perfectly (adjustable angles 67 or 68 deg), has a 1.5 headset so you could run a angleset if you wanted. they’re a grand at freeborn

    gab344
    Free Member

    The two Yeti’s in dickie’s post, are they the same frame, but different sizes? They look very different around the seat-tube/ back end of the toptube…

    dickie
    Free Member

    On MTBR both are listed as small but the top one is carbon front triangle.

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    Hmm… hadn’t noticed that before – really like the clean look of the top one, I guess I’d get stiffed with the extra tube if I bought the large.

    Edit – you’re right, had a look on the yeti site, it’s the difference between the Carbon & Alloy frames.

    That ASRc is my ultimate “don’t need it but would love to have it” bike. Aside from the ones I already have that I don’t need.

    ashfanman
    Free Member

    Transition Bandit is 67.5deg if you run a 150mm fork. That’s what I’ve gone for and love how it handles. Couldn’t be happier with it.

    If you want even slacker, the Mythic/Banshee Spitfire is 66deg in the slack setting and only has 120mm rear travel. A bit heavier, though, and there have been some posts on here about issues with bushing wear. Shame, as by all accounts it’s a ripper.

    dickie
    Free Member

    That ASRc is my ultimate “don’t need it but would love to have it” bike. Aside from the ones I already have that I don’t need.

    Yep, mine too – halfway between the 100mm & 140mm full susser’s I have & lighter than both.

Viewing 21 posts - 1 through 21 (of 21 total)

The topic ‘Slackish 120-130mm trail bike?’ is closed to new replies.