Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Sir! Keir! Starmer!
- This topic has 22,076 replies, 384 voices, and was last updated 8 hours ago by ernielynch.
-
Sir! Keir! Starmer!
-
dazhFull Member
Those that want a “real” socialist state need to look around them and see what the UK has wanted for the last 60 years and it is not a socialist state (as much as I would like to try the experiment)
Who wants a ‘real’ socialist state? It’s 2020 not 1920. Almost no one I know from a left wing persuasion wants to go back to the of days mass nationalisation, flying pickets or singing the red flag. Everyone I know on ‘the left’, myself included, only wants us to do the things that have never been tried and avoid the things that have proven to have failed in the fight against inequality and environmental destruction. There’s no real driving ideology other than solving these modern day problems with novel solutions, and taking an evidence based approach with full democratic accountability. Call it what you like but its not ‘socialism’ as most people would understand it.
binnersFull MemberNice to see Comrade Len isn’t letting Jeremy’s departure distract him from his lifelong mission to ensure permanent Tory government.
Len McCluskey warns Starmer as Unite moves to cut Labour funding
What a total **** that man is. He truly is the greatest gift the Tory party could possibly have wished for
kerleyFree MemberYep, cut Labour funding as they don’t represent the working people (of which half of those working people probably voted Tory last year) and ensure that the Tory party get in even more easily.
ransosFree MemberIt’s not entirely surprising to see who was the first to uncritically swallow the Guardian headline.
If you actually bother to read it, he said this: “But I don’t see at the moment any dramatic move to disaffiliate from the Labour party. The Labour party is our party.”
frankconwayFree MemberYep, uncle len truly is a tit; the sooner he goes – to count all the money he’s taken under the false pretence of ‘leading’ a union – the better.
piemonsterFree MemberIt’s not entirely surprising to see who was the first to uncritically swallow the Guardian headline.
Its also not surprising to see who was first to sneer condescendingly at the poster in question
ransosFree MemberIts also not surprising to see who was first to sneer condescendingly at the poster in question
It’s even less surprising to see that you, like the poster in question, are choosing to ignore the substance of an issue.
binnersFull MemberMorning Comrade! Taking a well earned break from tweeting #Starmerout?
Always great to hear opinions from the frontline.
I take it you approve of Lens latest move to get Boris out of a hole?
faddaFull Memberpetty sniping
It’s become the story of the Labour Party, hasn’t it…?
ransosFree MemberI’m not
I am however tired of your petty sniping
I see you’re still ignoring the issue. And as for petty sniping: see above.
ransosFree MemberMorning Comrade! Taking a well earned break from tweeting #Starmerout?
Always great to hear opinions from the frontline.
I take it you approve of Lens latest move to get Boris out of a hole?
I must commend your commitment to recycling.
piemonsterFree MemberI see you’re still ignoring the issue. And as for petty sniping: see above.
No I’m not ignoring it. Just because discussing didn’t form part of the post doesn’t mean it’s something I’m ignoring.
ransosFree MemberNo I’m not ignoring it. Just because discussing didn’t form part of the post doesn’t mean it’s something I’m ignoring.
Ok. In which case, I thank you for your contribution.
kelvinFull MemberThis will only help Labour win voters over to them. And if
Unitethe Unite leader cuts 10% at a time, it gives Labour a chance to wean themselves of the Unite funds. No idea where the money will come from though. With a few huge unions now dominating union membership, the party has to find a way to secure more independence from them. Again, I have no idea how… that’s for people at the heart of the party to work out… but they can’t ignore the issue now… he’s done them a favour, in a way.binnersFull MemberHere’s a question for you comrade? Its a multiple choice one, so easy enough.
You’ll know this as like most on the left you’re an expert on democratic mandates.
What percentage of Unite members voted for Voice of the People, Len McClusky at the last Unite leadership election
a) 100%
b) 55%
c) 5.5%
Simply state your answer in your next post, without any reference to any other contributor to the thread
GO!!!
binnersFull MemberNo?
Then allow me to enlighten you, comrade…
‘Red’ Len McClusky was elected as the General Secretary of the Unite union with the thumping great mandate afforded to him by 5.5% of the union membership
So heres another question for you: Again we’ll go for multiple choice answers…
Do you think that Len is in any fit position to be lecturing anyone, least of all the leader voted for overwhelmingly by the labour party membership, about democracy, accountability and mandates?
a) Yes
b) No
c) Jeremy Corbyn
kelvinFull Member“government in hindsight”
Subtle but smart line (as a retort to the Tories attempt to label him). Which sums him up, really, for good or for ill… subtle but smart.. smart but subtle.
kelvinFull Member“for the benefit of the Prime Minister, let me take things slowly for him”
“if the Prime Minister listened to the question, we might get on better”
Drip, drip reminder that the PM’s disdain for PMQs is also disdain for parliament, and disdain for the position he holds and the duties he continually fails to fulfil. It chimes with the idea growing amongst those that voted Conservative at the last election that the PM just isn’t bothering to do his job… or worse, simply not up to doing it. The ‘long game’ (remember that term) seems to be for Starmer to look like he’s ready to step across the chamber and take up the position that Johnson fails to fully fill… even if that annoys those that would rather see him out on marches.
piemonsterFree MemberAgree with what your saying a few posts back Kimbers
Also, 5.5%, WTF, how does that happen? Is it just apathy (as in hardly any of the membership actually voted) or something else?
binnersFull MemberBoris sounds even glummer than ever. Its like he’s totally resigned to having his arse handed to him for yet another week.
He can’t even be arsed with the bluster any more. He’s gradually becoming Gavin Williamson
binnersFull MemberAlso, 5.5%, WTF, how does that happen? Is it just apathy (as in hardly any of the membership actually voted) or something else?
70’s Marxist dinosaurs like Len and his ilk know that nobody ever bothers to vote in Union elections, which is exactly why they target them. They know its the only conceivable way they can get themselves in disproportionately influential positions. Despite this pathetic share of the vote, there were achieved only after all sorts of dirty tricks pulled by Lens campaign team.
Some mandate, eh?
Can you imagine if the likes of him tried to get elected as an MP? Or even a local councillor? He’d end up as a sort of Marxist Farage.
frankconwayFree MemberStarmer schools johnson – again; humiliates and insults him too.
Excellent.
The former has mastered the facts and prepared thoroughly; the latter hasn’t – he is disinterested.
The contrast is both stark and embarrassing.CoyoteFree MemberIt does seem more and more that Johnson can’t be arsed with PMQ’s. Unless of course one of his “right honourable friends” is blowing smoke up his arse. Liked Blackford’s comment about the PM ever answering a question.
dissonanceFull MemberIt does seem more and more that Johnson can’t be arsed with PMQ’s
He is struggling without the braying yobs behind him to drown out questions and to laugh at his hilarious statements.
The few allowed in are trying hard bless them but its just not the same as a big crowd. I am surprised they havent figured out how to order them all back in but maybe even cummings figures that wont go down well.ransosFree MemberAlso, 5.5%, WTF, how does that happen? Is it just apathy (as in hardly any of the membership actually voted) or something else?
The former, in my experience.
My union general secretary had less than 5% of the membership, but he supports Starmer so it doesn’t matter.
binnersFull MemberDid he spend the last 4 years issuing threats, on behalf of you all, to Jeremy Corbyn that he’d withdraw his Unions funding of the party because he didn’t like him?
I presume so, yeah?
ransosFree Memberdid he spend the last 4 years issuing threats, on behalf of you all, to Jeremy Corbyn to withdraw his Unions funding of the party because he didn’t like him?
I presume so, yeah?
No idea what you’re on about. Unions can vote to disaffiliate from the Labour Party, and indeed the RMT and FBU did exactly that. For affiliated unions, members can choose whether or not their subscriptions are used to support the Labour party. I guess this is all a bit too democratic for your liking.
binnersFull MemberYes, the activities of union dinosaurs like Len McClusky. having a hissy fit and throwing threats about because their mate got booted out, are the living embodiment of the word ‘democracy’ comrade.
Maybe you could nip round to his central London flat, the one he bought with union members subs, to discuss the matter further?
Mind you, he’ll probably be at his usual table in the Ivy at this time, won’t he?
Power to the people!!!
We must throw off our chains and rise up against our capitalist oppressors.
… right after I’ve finished this chateauneuf du pape
ransosFree MemberYes, the activities of union dinosaurs like Len McClusky. having a hissy fit and throwing threats about because their mate got booted out, are the living embodiment of the word ‘democracy’ comrade.
Maybe you could nip round to his central London flat, the one he bought with union members subs, to discuss the matter further?
If you’re that bothered, join Unite and exercise your vote accordingly.
bradsFree MemberIt’s actually a bit of a shame that Starmer has turned out to be a complete non entity.
I kind of hoped he would actually provide a meaningful opposition but all he really does is bleat about everything the Tory party does without giving any meaningful thought out alternatives.And as far as I can tell he’s changed nothing in the labour party of any importance.
As for Unite, I’ve been a union member for 35 yrs and I’m glad they will be giving less to the Labour party. That’s always stuck in my craw anyway.
dissonanceFull MemberOh dear expect to be accused of being a comrade accompanied by some hilarious images.
binnersFull MemberIf you’re that bothered, join Unite and exercise your vote accordingly
And subsidise Lens expense account?
No thanks
mrchrispyFull Memberwhat the point in putting effort and resources into bleating on about alternatives.
They cant actually do anything and the tories wil just nick anything worth nicking and rebrand it as their own idea come the next election.I’m sure they’ve got some ideas but are keeping their powder dry until it needed and actualy make a difference.
Corbyn was a bellend, I can get behind Kier
bradsFree MemberBrads doesn’t like “lefties”, so I doubt it.
It’s actually intolerant, cancelers I can’t be arsed with.
Have a view, just don’t ram it down others throats with a dogmatic attitude.
But yeh, lefties are tits.
roneFull MemberPeople still supporting Starmer as he lurches forward to rich donors?
Mr “I support the government” is heading for a double disaster. The Tories will out right-wing him on all the Red Wall related issues and the left are being made homeless.
He actually said – “things were getting ridiculous” at PMQs – getting ridiculous. Schools back-firing? Mr “I support the government.”
A party afloat with no rudder, no alternative and no sense of purpose.
But competent like.
But keep on talking down Marxism Binners. That’s the centrist spirit.
Centrists such as Freedland are culpable too for where we are for the constant baying of personality to its readership. These columnist idiots (Rawnsley, Toynbee) certainly helped Boris in his mission. And yet take no responsibility for where we are now.
roneFull MemberBut yeh, lefties are tits.
Then be stuck with the direction of the country.
roneFull Memberwhat the point in putting effort and resources into bleating on about alternatives
We were told we had a functioning opposition by the left’s greatest supporter George Osborne. I mean when you have endorsements from failed right-wing chancellors who needs the electorate.
What bloody resources? You mean the whole purpose of holding the government to account and starting the narrative to give the electorate an alternative?
Is he still playing the long game?
You’re right though the opposition is clearly there to support the government in its shambolic existence. Because that’s exactly what its doing.
In uncle Keirs own words – “I support the Government.”
Wears a nice suit though.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.