Home Forums News Shimano GRX RX820 – New Gravel Groupset Goes 12 Speed!

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 45 total)
  • Shimano GRX RX820 – New Gravel Groupset Goes 12 Speed!
  • chipps
    Full Member

    Today Shimano has launched its new GRX gravel groupset – Shimano GRX RX820. The brief highlights are that it’s now 12 speed and that, by using Shimano …

    By chipps

    Get the full story here:

    Shimano GRX RX820 – New Gravel Groupset Goes 12 Speed!

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    Some of us have been runnj g a 51t cassette without mods since GRX came out. Albeit 11sp

    didnthurt
    Full Member

    GRX was such a clever product at launch and left an easy progression path with any new technologies.
    Shimano pretty much cherry picked bits from their other road and off-road groupsets, but only using older 11 speed technology. I’ve had my GRX since 2020 and it has been a good product to use but has also had it’s faults.

    The chainset only take GRX specific rings.
    My right shifter failed to shift recently.
    Both brake calipers started to leak and were replaced wth Hope.

    mtbfix
    Full Member

    thepathlesspedalled will be happy to see the front mech still going strong. No friction option though?

    ampthill
    Full Member

    Presumably one can run this with with an MTB chainset in 1x configuration. Another good option.

    nixie
    Full Member

    Let’s hope for some 11speed deals 😀.

    petefromearth
    Full Member

    Let’s hope for some 11speed deals 😀.

    Slight tangent – will 11spd GRX STIs work with an 11 speed XTR rear mech?

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    I’m more interested in Microshift Sword 2×10 and 1×10….

    1
    Daffy
    Full Member

    My GRX 815 DI2 has been utterly faultless on 2 bikes with a combined mileage of 25k km.  I’ve replaced 1 chain in all that time.

    The 12s has some big shoes to fill.

    2
    slackboy
    Full Member

    will 11spd GRX STIs work with an 11 speed XTR rear mech?

    Cable pull is different but you can use a tanpan to use 11 speed road/gravel shifters with MTB mechs

    Tanpan

    didnthurt
    Full Member

    @daffy that’s really impressive. I’ve done maybe half your distance and am on my 4th chain, second cassette, second chainring and third bottom bracket. I do like to ride in the winter slop though.

    mark.t
    Free Member

    Will there be a 73mm BB option on the crankset?  There are quite a few gravel frames that have a 73mm BB shell, so an MTB crankset is often required.  I’ve but XT or SLX on both of my gravel bikes because the GRX ones won’t fit.

    chakaping
    Full Member

    Some of us have been runnj g a 51t cassette without mods since GRX came out. Albeit 11sp

    The 812 (?) rear mech takes that without any hanger extenders or whatnot?

    I was thinking of trying an 11-46t SLX cassette I’ve got spare. If that works I see no need for 12sp personally.

    cx_monkey
    Full Member

    pretty sure there’s quite a reasonable number of boost spaced gravel frames on the market now, which would mean any boost hub with miscrospline would work with this, on those frames? Unless this microspline is different to the microspline used on the ‘mtb’ kit….? And yeah, GRX specific chain rings are a bt of a pain still – I used a Praxis crank instead (Alba I think…) cos it has a removeable spider and uses the SRAM 3 bolt interface, so any number of 1x NW rings available for it. Bit of a mish mash of stuff – ‘old’ 11 spd GRX 600 mech and shifters, Praxxis crank and a Superstar 38T chainring. 11-46T XT cassette. Standard caliper on the back, but swapped out the front for a non-series shimano 4 pot caliper. seems to all work well together though!

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    The 812 (?) rear mech takes that without any hanger extenders or whatnot?

    Yep

    Shimano Deore CS-M5100 cassette

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Let’s hope for some 11speed deals

    The 12 speed stuff is at whole different price point to the 11 speed stuff.

    Scratch that… RRP is pretty close, isn’t it.

    3
    jameso
    Full Member

    +1 for the mechanical and keeping doubles approach but 48-31 is still a big chainset (and quite a gap between ring sizes)

    Still waiting for something in the 42-28 range from Shimano. 10s MTB doubles were great for gravel bikes.

    chakaping
    Full Member

    Yep

    Cheers boss

    cy
    Full Member

    The 10-51 1×12 new GRX uses the XT cassette and chain, so on a more drop bar mtb type bike you would just use an SLX, XT or XTR chainset and away you go.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Still waiting for something in the 42-28 range from Shimano. 10s MTB doubles were great for gravel bikes.

    I have 46/30t GRX 10sp from Ribble’s silly sale (£30).
    Combined with a 11-36 rear cassette it is great on my do it all bike, even winching up hills with pannier on.
    At some point I will add goatlink an an 11-40 cassette and have (albeit with larger jumps) full touring / off road winching ratios.

    sillyoldman
    Full Member

    @james0 – and Ben Delaney was complaining that the single ring options don’t go big enough. UK wants lower ratios, US wants higher? We’re a tough crowd…

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    Still waiting for something in the 42-28 range from Shimano. 10s MTB doubles were great for gravel bikes.

    I’ve got an XT M785, 175mm, 40-28T in Black BNIB (a posh box, too) if that would help anyone?

    2
    jameso
    Full Member

    I have 46/30t GRX 10sp from Ribble’s silly sale (£30).
    Combined with a 11-36 rear cassette it is great on my do it all bike, even winching up hills with pannier on.
    At some point I will add goatlink an an 11-40 cassette and have (albeit with larger jumps) full touring / off road winching ratios.

    I don’t mind larger jumps at the back but I prefer a smaller gap at the front. When the jump up front is bigger the compensation shifts are needed and the whole thing seems a faff Vs 1X. I rarely need higher than 42×11 on a gravel bike and with 11-34 at the back a 40 or 42 is used like a 1×8 or 1×9 most of the time, with a lower 1x option for climbs, loaded riding etc. So the 28-40 XT I’ve been on for a while is really nice, you shift up front and often don’t need compensation at the back. Anyway.. subjective stuff, not saying it’s better, just that the range of choice isn’t great.

    Ben Delaney was complaining that the single ring options don’t go big enough

    I’m man enough to be seen with smaller rings and do ok on them : ) I just don’t need to pedal past about 25-28mph on a gravel bike, or at least not for long and there’s no sprints for bragging rights on my rides.

    I’ve got an XT M785, 175mm, 40-28T in Black BNIB (a posh box, too) if that would help anyone?

    I would but I’m on 170s. If you sell the arms I’d take the rings.

    1
    kelvin
    Full Member

    Gravel riding in the USA ≠ gravel riding in the UK.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    thepathlesspedalled will be happy to see the front mech still going strong. No friction option though?

    Hasn’t Russ endorsed another friction shifter for precisely this sort of application?

    Edit- here you go Soma/dia compe apparently:

    Glad they’re kept mechanical shifting, also glad to hear mechanical shifting 105 is out (hydraulic disc braking only though).

    I will of course be browsing old 11 speed GRX prices now of course because new and shiny with a bonus click means the old stock getting run out at more affordable prices…

    Of course one thing is missing from the autumn hype train (so far), where’s the promised CUES for drop-bars eh? Staggered embargo or just not a priority?

    1
    jameso
    Full Member

    use an SLX, XT or XTR chainset and away you go

    10T gap’s a bit small. Fussy aren’t I … but it’s no issue, I just buy AM rings for my own bikes.

    I think OEM and AM spec could be a bit wider in this area but I also think Shimano do more customer research than I do so I’m probably an outlier. I do see a lot of people walking gravel bikes up hill that aren’t really that steep/hard and some of that is gearing, but there’s solutions in what’s available already.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    I think OEM and AM spec could be a bit wider in this area but I also think Shimano do more customer research than I do so I’m probably an outlier. I do see a lot of people walking gravel bikes up hill that aren’t really that steep/hard and some of that is gearing, but there’s solutions in what’s available already.

    I don’t think you’re an outlier, I think Shimano are often quite conservative and know stretching ranges to win the numbers game could result in more returns. Gravel bikes with ‘sub-compact’ 2x make a lot of sense, I think lots of people/companies are still feeling out the ratios though.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    I think OEM and AM spec could be a bit wider in this area but I also think Shimano do more customer research than I do so I’m probably an outlier. I do see a lot of people walking gravel bikes up hill that aren’t really that steep/hard and some of that is gearing, but there’s solutions in what’s available already.

    I am not sure you are an outlier.
    I wonder, and you will know more about this, if there is an issue of product managers in big corporations such as Shimano looking at US or Asian gravel and riding more than UK/European riding. They need to understand steep and slippery hills more.
    And perhaps I would also say there is an issue with companies specifying things – basically so many gravel / do it all bikes come with CX gearing. Road gearing seems fixated on what a professional rider would use, not your average fitness punter. Therefore so many of these gravel / do it all bikes come either way over geared or 1x because 1x.

    I too would prefer a slightly smaller jump on front rings, avoiding that downshift at the back when you swap, and put up with some bigger jumps at the rear. Maybe 46/36 and an 11-42…?

    1
    cookeaa
    Full Member

    I’m a fan of the spa-cycles approach:

    “Super compact”

    Basically take your old touring 3x, 110/74 BCD crank play with the inner/middle rings to give a range of 16T difference options and lengths, bolt on a dorky bash guard than most punters will remove immediately then double the asking price…

    Personally I’m more tempted to buy this in 170mm and and this in 42t for use with an 11-36 or 11-40 cassette. But I’m weird and don’t see a problem with square taper BBs.

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    and Ben Delaney was complaining that the single ring options don’t go big enough. UK wants lower ratios, US wants higher? We’re a tough crowd…

    The same Ben Delaney who reviewed the new Santa Cruz Stigmata as ground breaking with its clearance and slacker head angle and when I asked how it was different to what some gravel bikes have had for around 3 years he couldn’t answer…..wait, he did say it had a door in the down tube…..yea Ben, no one’s done that before have they!

    MSP
    Full Member

    Shimano do more customer research than I do

    Both shimano and sram are well behind the curve on crank length offerings, 165mm cranks are still like hens teeth, while many riders are now wanting even shorter. So I don’t actually think they are aware of the market so much as they expect to be able to dictate that the market.

    sillyoldman
    Full Member

    Gravel riding in the USA ≠ gravel riding in the UK.

    That there is the problem.

     

    Good that the group can now be mixed with Shimano 12 spd MTB chainsets for lower ratios.

    Those who want bigger ratios can fit bigger tyres….

    ampthill
    Full Member

    Sadly I’m so use to to Shimano getting the chainsets wrong I’ve sort of ignored it.

    I’m not sure why shimano can’t see that consumers want flexibility. There are clearly people happy are happy with a bottom gear of 30×36 or 40×42. But that doesn’t work for me. My gravel bike is 26×36 with a spa cycles sub compact and 650b wheels. I could go lower particularly if I had bigger wheels.

    In the summer I road a today gravel event in Wales. People were on a wide range of bikes. But we all went up the same hills. Non were technical and the MTBs were using their gears down to say 32×50. No idea why any one think that those on drop bar riders wouldn’t want the option of a similarly low gear

    ampthill
    Full Member

    Gravel riding in the USA ≠ gravel riding in the UK.

    Yep the US have gravel roads that hit 13,000 ft. Should the group sets really be based on a narrow spectrum of flatish well published races. Rather than say the Tour Divide. I think I read that there were no Di2 bikes in this years event. Loads on sram electronic shutters apparently. Presumably, in part, because the riders on drop bars can use it to access MTB gearing

    1
    mattsccm
    Free Member

    Another daft tiny cog.

    Why not run something like a 13 up? You could go slightly smaller on the front as  and thus a smaller bottom gear . Of course run 2x so you don’t have those silly gaps.

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    11-51 cassette, GRX rear mech and brifters XT crank with 36t ring

    PXL_20221205_133641508

    timmycee
    Free Member

    Just confirming @rocketdog’s comments on 51t cassettes already being compatible with GRX, albeit on mine I used a Garbaruk cage. Shifts perfect, indiscernible from factory derailleur. 36×51 gets me up anything in Shropshire, with the only limitation being pie intake and lack of fitness. I’d post of pic but it’s a PITA.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    Here’s a question, the new road/gravel 12 speed mechanical is it still using the same cable pull? Would the RX820 mech be backwards compatible with 11/10 speed levers?

    It’s not like 10 and 11 speed cassettes in wider ranges aren’t available and if you’ve got perfectly good levers already, are people really that bothered by the extra sprocket?

    iainc
    Full Member

    I was hoping they’d release this in di2 soon, I have 11 speed GRX mechanical on one of the gravel bikes and it’s a bit tired. Think I’ll hang off for electronic and just replace chain for now.

    other gravel bike has 12 speed GX AXS and Rival AXS etap  groupset  and is nicer on the gear side, but I hate the brakes !

    ampthill
    Full Member

    Here’s a question, the new road/gravel 12 speed mechanical is it still using the same cable pull? Would the RX820 mech be backwards compatible with 11/10 speed levers?

    yep we need to know that….

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 45 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.