PeterPoddy may not express it in a very sensible way but he has got a point.
Unionisation is obviously a good thing for workers rights. They keep a check on the excesses of unrestricted capitalism (which is a good thing) and the threat of strike is obviously their ultimate bargaining chip.
But I think where this becomes dangerous, if left to flourish unchecked, is when it relates to essential services. A strike here is not only holding the employer to ransom but the general public as well.
So when we get a bit pissed off at the tanker drivers (or the teachers, train drivers, fire brigade etc) its not because we favour BP and Shell getting richer but because we are angry that we have been sucked into the unions games and have become collateral damage.
This anger will be magnified when we see what the union is asking for is out of whack with what is happening to everyone else. It makes it look like they are using their strong bargaining power of a strike threat (only available to them due to their position of providing essential services) to get over the odds, more than the worker in another sector can get when they don’t have the general public by the balls.
Unite, Bob Crow and all their other despicable cronies would do well to recogise this.