I know what you were referring to – the divine right to expect everyone else to look out for road users who take the piss
Never mind legality, “right of way” is a convention that (mostly) avoids crashes and gridlock at junctions because everyone should know how to behave there
(of course neither of us was there, so I’m assuming that events were as described and that the margin for error was as narrow as the OP suggests)
OP had “right of way”, clearly saw the tit on his bike and had to prepare to avoid him. Maybe had to brake a bit in which case, as we all know, there’s potential for some other arse somewhere behind to fail to see this and cause a crash. Maybe his attention was drawn to the cyclist and he might not have properly notice some other hazard as a result. Maybe the bike/car behind the tit just follows on, safe in the “knowledge” that the road was clear
Try almost any thread where riders get knocked off – are they all idiots for misinterpreting “right of way”?
Those Dutch junctions with the inbuilt ambiguity sound great, but that’s not what we have on our roads. One individual introducing it is stupid.