Home Forums Bike Forum Is there anything that annoys you about the bike industry?

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 153 total)
  • Is there anything that annoys you about the bike industry?
  • Junkyard
    Free Member

    it does make sense. And most hubs will accomodate it.

    Ah good so a new standard that only some of my kit works with

    Brilliant

    Also a good shout on the cost of pads and discs/general consumables – ie jockey wheels at abouT 50% mech price

    i can get replacements for the car cheaper than for the bike in terms of pads and discs

    stilltortoise
    Free Member

    Orange bikes parts upgrades. The biggest rip off going. Charge you full RRP for the upgraded part and pocket the standard item!

    Example? I’ve been looking at a Five and was worried this might be going on, but couldn’t find any evidence. I suspect their standard headsets and bottom brackets cost pence.

    ojom
    Free Member

    They aren’t ripping anyone off. You are not being forced to buy their bikes. It is a choice.

    v10
    Free Member

    Consumers grumbling about it on the internets 😆

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Hope bb upgrade =£60. Available for £59. Reverb upgrade £230???? WTF???
    Maybe not a rip off, certainly attempted rip off.
    You can buy a five frame and build it up to the same spec or better for less money than a complete build.

    rogerthecat
    Free Member

    I really hate the way the industry markets things that “will make you a better rider”, but which actually make you think you are a better rider. Mostly by adding overly complex, expensive solutions to a brilliantly simple machine.

    reggiegasket
    Free Member

    No attractive, good value carbon disc-braked roadie yet.

    Blower
    Free Member

    It’s obviously more profitable for the industry to make you think that if you don’t manage to go through a technical climb, to corner efficiently or to take a jump properly, it’s due to your (already) outdated bike parts.

    yep

    they gotta keep it ticking over to keep themselves in work and driving their Mercedes Vito’s about eh 😉

    keep changing it so we have to buy new parts to fit.

    allmountainventure
    Free Member

    Reviews

    “oh your not buying the back cover? ok you get the hunk of junk award in the next test”

    BadlyWiredDog
    Full Member

    The Whyte 46 and similar ‘it’s the new messiah’ kit/bikes/concepts that only really show their true colours a year or so after they launch. And stuff designed to work in Californian sunshine that falls apart as soon as it meets UK trails. And Crank Brothers – please, why?

    jameso
    Full Member

    What annoys me about the bike industry? Not much, there’s choice for all and loads of good people to work with. There’s little underhand dealing or snidey cr’p going on and it seems to be pretty meritocratic. There’s loads of small businesses and creative, clever people doing well for themselves. Even the bigh players (ime and despite the tin-hatters’ beliefs) are full of keen product-orientated people at all levels who are passionate and geniune about what they do.

    Yeah some standards are a bit annoying but it’s the flipside of progress, the endless ‘add-a-cog’ is tiring, HT2 BBs are getting on my wick at the mo and I wish tubeless tyre tolerances were more consistent, but all in all it’s not much to bother about. I can chose to ignore it or I can find solutions.

    I really hate the way the industry markets things that “will make you a better rider”, but which actually make you think you are a better rider. Mostly by adding overly complex, expensive solutions to a brilliantly simple machine.

    If there wasn’t such demand for or excitement over these complex parts there would be more of us on rigid ss bikes and I wouldn’t get laughed at on group rides for my luddite bike / ‘brilliantly simple machine’ ) Some love the tech, plenty make good use of it. Sometimes people go though a tech / bling phase and come back to the simpler bikes, it’s all good perspective / experience.

    Marketing always comes up but is no different in the bike industry as any other. If anything, a smaller % of company spend comapred to many industries. Smart phones, cars, gadgets, all on the great consumer march forward and promisiung to make your life better. Marketeers are no worse than consumers who suck it up, encouraging them. Shout at the modern world all you like, the only thing worth doing that is listened to is voting with your hard-earned.

    On reviews – look up Steve Worlands piece in Privateer this month.

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    Grumpy bike shop owners/workers.

    I’m not saying all, but of the shops I frequent (about 10) 2 give unabridged, out of their way SERVICE.

    T’is all we need.

    UK-FLATLANDER
    Full Member

    It would have to be the general poor quality of cycle clothing when compared to walking / climbing products.

    mattjg
    Free Member

    American parts and frames cost about the same number of pounds as dollars. The product you want to buy has to go through the mits of an import/distributor AND an LBS, each of which (cough) “add value”.

    Orange-Crush
    Free Member

    The most expensive piece of metal known to man – 2 plain steel countersunk jockeywheel screws for a SRAM mech – thirty odd pounds the pair (plus postage). No, I didn’t buy them.

    crashtestmonkey
    Free Member

    Orange bikes parts upgrades. The biggest rip off going. Charge you full RRP for the upgraded part and pocket the standard item!

    Example? I’ve been looking at a Five and was worried this might be going on, but couldn’t find any evidence. I suspect their standard headsets and bottom brackets cost pence

    look at the price of the standard, and the pro/Hope upgraded bike. Unless things have changed the difference in price is the RRP of the upgraded (usually Hope) price, not the difference in price between that and the original item. Basically sanctioned theft, as youre paying for the original part and not getting it.

    Having just played on the Orange site this may be changing: it costs £200 to upgrade from a Fox shock to a CCDB on an Alpine 160 frame. When I bought my mine a couple of years ago they charged £400 to upgrade from a £300 shock to a £450 shock 😯 (and no I wasnt stupid enough to pay that).

    American parts and frames cost about the same number of pounds as dollars

    even more offensive when this works in reverse. I moved to the US to work for a couple of years in the late 90’s. The Triumph Daytona cost £9000 in the UK at the time. I walked into a dealer out there to find Triumph could crate bikes up, ship them 3000 miles, pay import taxes, and sell them for $9000 and still presumably make money 🙄

    rogerthecat
    Free Member

    If there wasn’t such demand for or excitement over these complex parts there would be more of us on rigid ss bikes and I wouldn’t get laughed at on group rides for my luddite bike / ‘brilliantly simple machine’ ) Some love the tech, plenty make good use of it. Sometimes people go though a tech / bling phase and come back to the simpler bikes, it’s all good perspective / experience.

    Nope, sorry the industry creates needs and supplies ever more expensive and complex solutions through the industry media. It’s how it works in this and most other industries. I merely expressed that I hate the way that it has, in my opinion, spoiled what is a simple and efficient machine.

    timidwheeler
    Full Member

    Grumpy bike shop owners/workers.I’m not saying all, but of the shops I frequent (about 10) 2 give unabridged, out of their way SERVICE.

    This.
    My LBS has been excellent BTW.

    stilltortoise
    Free Member

    Hope bb upgrade =£60. Available for £59. Reverb upgrade £230???? WTF???
    Maybe not a rip off, certainly attempted rip off.
    You can buy a five frame and build it up to the same spec or better for less money than a complete build.

    I know Orange full builds don’t always scream value for money, but I hardly call this a rip off. What’s the RRP of a stock seat post on a Five? What’s the full RRP of a Reverb. I guarantee the difference is at least £230 if not more. Same with the Bottom bracket. Full RRP of a Hope BB is £75. We’re spoilt in that there are so many online stores that will sell us stuff at a big reduction from retail price that we think anyone charging near-retail prices is ripping us off.

    charliedontsurf
    Full Member

    Beer,

    i have had more free drinks in a single day in the advertising world than a year in the bike world.

    Seriously too many BB and headset “standards”, and now axles have joined in too.

    belugabob
    Free Member

    The relative lack of bike manufacturers who offer a frame only option (at a sensible) price – I’ve ridden a couple of demo bikes that handled really well, but which had undesirable finishing kit (brakes/gears etc)

    Different colours schemes on different models using the same frame. i.e. I can only afford the base model, but really want the colour they offer for the top of the range.

    ctznsmith
    Free Member

    That my office has no windows. 😉

    On the whole its ok, some mark ups can appear a bit steep. I’ve worked in worst industries/jobs though.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    I know Orange full builds don’t always scream value for money, but I hardly call this a rip off. What’s the RRP of a stock seat post on a Five? What’s the full RRP of a Reverb. I guarantee the difference is at least £230 if not more. Same with the Bottom bracket. Full RRP of a Hope BB is £75. We’re spoilt in that there are so many online stores that will sell us stuff at a big reduction from retail price that we think anyone charging near-retail prices is ripping us off.

    Do you think that it’s right that a complete bike is priced according to the RRP of it’s components?
    I bloody don’t. That’s the whole point of buying a complete bike, so that you benefit from the manufacturers buying power. Perhaps rip off is strong, but it definitely represents poor value for money.
    I presume you understand that orange don’t buy the retail items? No bleed kits etc, so charging RRP is bang out IMO.

    IanW
    Free Member

    Crap wheels on everything, why not fit decent wheels, bearings etc I dont give a …. what the rear mech is.

    Support your retailers, fed up of hearing LBS whinge, either give em all a good price or get rid of em.

    crashtestmonkey
    Free Member

    I know Orange full builds don’t always scream value for money, but I hardly call this a rip off

    but Orange aren’t a parts supplier, they sell bikes and frames. So why should they price parts at RRP, we know they are buying them cheap as an OE supplier because thats one of the ways we get them cheap from mail order.

    Even your own example undermines your argument:

    Full RRP for a hope BB might be £75, but the Race Face X-type it replaces has an RRP of £40. So charging £60 to fit a £75 part instead of a £40 part is a rip off. A buyer would do better to get the RF BB, then buy a Hope for £59 mail order and either have 2 BBs for the price Orange would have only supplied one, or sell the RF and end up ahead of the game.

    Struggling to see how this is not a rip off, and why people would pay that sort of money to upgrade at the point of purchase (and I’m not an Orange Hater, as per earlier post I ride an Alpine 160).

    kingkongsfinger
    Free Member

    wrecker – Member

    Santa Cruz/Jungle UK price gouging

    Don’t get me started on the US/UK pricing jungle are the worst for this IMO. I wish SC would go to silverfish.

    I ended up buying a Trek Top Fuel rather than a Santa Cruz Tallboy, after looking at the Santa Cruz US prices compared to the UK prices.

    jameso
    Full Member

    Rogerthecat, I meant the ‘simple machine’ bit as a compliment to your phrase and agreeing with that side of your point. I love simple bikes. There’s still loads of choice for those that do.
    Just took your post as a springboard into another point really, the fact so many bikes aren’t simpler is because so many people want tech in life, they like gadgets and ‘the next thing’.
    I’d spec more simple rigid bikes in my job if I could, I’m pushing for them bit by bit, but we’re up against customer demand that buys ‘more’ rather than ‘less’ in shops and most brands cater for that.
    I don’t buy into this common ‘blame marketing’ thing that crops up regularly. People give marketing too much credit for steering us. A lot of riders do want remotely travel-adjustable sus, 1×11 and dropper posts, why not – and so they get marketed. I see it as a 50-50 thing, one reacts to the other.

    RamseyNeil
    Free Member

    It wouldn’t be too hard if the will was there for virtually all bikes to have the same mech hanger and virtually all disc brakes to use the same pads .

    nickc
    Full Member

    Put rack and guard mounts on everything, please

    god no!

    American parts that aren’t tested in Europe and fall apart at the merest hint of moisture.

    stilltortoise
    Free Member

    (with regard to the Orange discussion)…the thing is that someone half competent with a spanner and the ability to shop around will always find a cheaper way to upgrade a stock bike themselves. I’m in that same position myself in that I’d like to get a bike shop to build me a custom bike but know that with careful shopping I could do it cheaper myself. How many bike shops would charge me £525 for full XT (including brakes) like Merlin? If there are any please speak up (I don’t expect free labour by the way).

    I’m ummed and ahhhd plenty of times on the Orange bike builder, wondering what to upgrade and what to leave until it wears out. The temptation to go overboard on the upgrades is always there. Orange must have looked at how cars are sold and how much money can be made by the add-ons. Their website is better than most when it comes to choosing a bike.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s great that we have an English bike manufacturer standing up to the big boys. I just find it disappointing that they’ve not bothered trying to offer good value (IMHO). A more cynical chap might suggest that they’re taking advantage of their customers loyalty.

    michaelmcc
    Free Member

    The way some things are changed/updated every few years when you need to change a part, and then said part isn’t compatible with the parts you already have 😡 .

    sputnik
    Free Member

    2013 cranks which are 15% stiffer than 2012 cranks which were 20% stiffer than 2011 cranks which were 25% stiffer than the year before’s etc ….
    Which means the cranks from 2009 was made from noodles???

    orangeboy
    Free Member

    For me it’s brands making stuff that’s unique to there bikes
    My Spesh road bike uses a headset that I can only get from them
    And gear hangs or brake pads

    While other are knocking orange I will add my own
    Today I got a hanger for my orange ht £25.00
    Hanger for my Spesh bike is £10.00

    mattjg
    Free Member

    I ended up buying a Trek Top Fuel rather than a Santa Cruz Tallboy, after looking at the Santa Cruz US prices compared to the UK prices.

    I ended up buying a Swift instead of a Niner MCR9 after looking at Niner’s US prices (I mean retail prices, with dealer mark up already added on).

    Bloody glad I did too, it’s great.

    chipsngravy
    Free Member

    Lack of choice. Too many shops going for the “safe” brands.

    The “industry” moaning about online superstores (Wiggle/CRC) and direct sellng (Canyon).

    On One’s naff branding

    Lack of carbon frames with internal cable routing.

    stomlinson
    Free Member

    Orange boy have you tried Betd in Stoke for mech hangers they may be able to help you out had a few on other bikes. To add to the orange argument I own a 2012 five pro with a few add ons love the bike but have to agree they seem to be milking their customers I am pretty sure about 6 years ago a five pro was about 1700 quid now your looking at 3 grand. When on a demo day I questioned the Orange guy about direct sales but he said they are not geared up for it but I can’t see it being a massive issue I would say a large portion of Orange’s customer base must be within the uk, Orange don’t even have distributer costs as the deliver direct to the shops and they are still not competitive on price I could drive to their door and still not get a good deal, think I may be shopping Yt next time

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Miserable gits on the internet who think rigid bikes are awesome telling the rest of us anything invented since 1990 is a gimmick.

    Oem pricing

    Import duty and 20% vat when I loved in the UK (all us prices are generally quotes before and sales tax.)

    BrickMan
    Full Member

    The price of chainrings.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Companies trying any excuse they can to wriggle out of warranties
    Acronyms
    “Standards”
    Companies that notice that people will buy crap just because it’s pretty, and so choose to sell crap instead of making something better.
    <and their associates, people who buy crap then moan>

    And yes, you do have to be simple to pay for some of the Orange upgrades.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 153 total)

The topic ‘Is there anything that annoys you about the bike industry?’ is closed to new replies.