*Triple Pedant mode*
*double pedant mode*… sorry but filter geotextiles are most definitely permeable, it would be a very inefficent soakaway if wrapped in an impermeable membrane.
Eh… That’s what I said. It’s not necessarily a soakaway. You don’t generally built a soakaway where the permeability of the subsoil is so low that it won’t actually soak away. What you do in those circumstances is wrap in an impermeable membrane and have a control structure such as a weir or a hydro brake in a manhole that either connects it back into the sewer or to a watercourse.
You absolutely do wrap it in permeable membrane if you want it to soakaway.
So when you design one you typically need the infiltration rate of the underlying geology by doing a soakaway test and the hydrology of the site. If it soaks away you would then have to size it to provide the storage needed to allow the time required to soakaway (reservoir routing calculation) either in excel or in software like micro drainage.
If you go down the release to watercourse or sewer you would need the discharge rate permissable and size the tank and control structure to achieve that.
I can send you the Suds Manual Ciria report C753 if you don’t believe me.
But why dig such a gert big hole and not fill it with the crates?
Might not be finished yet. If it’s been designed properly they need an inlet structure (manhole with a pipe or a set of crates connecting it to the main tank should also have a silt trap of some description) and also the bottom rows should have jetting locations which is a pipe connected to an inspection chamber (each row needs its own).
It also easier to back fill if you have enough space to compact it properly.