If its a double then it’s got a better chance of working, probably worth googling, info along the shimergo lines?
Shimano have a high bar to qualify as compatible. The distance between the chainrings changed (can’t remember if it’s 8-9spd or 9 to 10spd), but it’s not the crank it’s the small chainring has the teeth slightly narrower thus moving the center of the chainrings closer together. So it made no difference in the real world but shimano mark it as incompatible.
From the tech docs I could find, they seem to have messed around with front mechs at almost every iteration. Problem is knowing which of those actually had any impact in the real world.
my opinion yes – run double 10speed 105 shifters (not sure of series but when they moved to both brake and gear as side exit) with a 26/38 XT crankset and an XT front mech (and rear) as far as I know same pull as DuraAce 7800 and it shifts very cleanly
Presumably 9s mechs, 10s rear mechs definitely weren’t compatible. If that means 9s front mechs work though then it’s a good start.
edit prepared to be told otherwise but reckon matching the front mech to the chainset is a good starting place
Dunno, I think the chainring spacing has always been pretty consistent, just the rings got narrower.
this is really not an issue, the lever isn’t floppy because there’s still a return spring holding it in the right place and it doesn’t affect the braking at all not having a gear cable in. I’ve had 105 levers on a 1×10 for a few years and it hasn’t bothered me one bit.
After all this head scratching I might just go singlespeed!