Good news indeed. Not as good as it was but another one that feels that this is indicative of the ‘out but starting to move back towards’ process. Also at the risk of starting the same argument again, why being out is crap but we can still make the best of it now.
On the getting back more than you get in. I understand the philosophy but it doesn’t always wash. To me the benefit is the collaborative angle, and if we can move faster / discover things sooner as a result of the work of other, potentially more talented* researchers in other countries I don’t really mind who does the research and gets the larger share of the money. That’s what collaborative synergies are. If we wanted to get out what we put in / have absolute control, then just fund internal research…… but then you miss out on collaboration.
* Yes, there were times when we probably did get more because for all our faults we are/were still one of the bigger players with better facilities and equipment in Europe – so others were benefiting from us. Others have caught up, not least because we have lost some very talented researchers in the past few years to Europe because they were losing their ability to collaborate. I know both sides were part of the argument over the GFA, but if only that could have been avoided / sorted sooner. Bojo and reneging on agreements be damned.