The Beatles – cheap big brand lager – mass produced ultimately tasteless and full of preservatives, needs sponsorship of major events to keep them relevant
I know you’re having a laugh, but I can’t say I agree with your analysis there, apart from not remaining relevant – although how a band who broke up more than 40 years ago could, and why they should, be relevant is a moot point imo.
As I’ve mentioned in an earlier post, I’m not really a fan, well probably I like them on the same level as I do Oasis, I can listen to a song or two, but never manage to make it through a whole album.
BUT
mass produced ultimately tasteless and full of preservatives
No, no and no. Like the stuff or not (and largely I don’t) surely you have to respect a band who went from the screaming-teen-girls-drowning-out-the-sound of “Yeah Yeah Yeah She Loves You, ooooh”, stopped touring, and went into the studio with the level of ambition that they did, at the time they did it. Maybe the stuff hasn’t aged well, but they really were breaking new ground with the way they harnessed what was, at the time, the cutting edge of what it was possible for a four piece rock’n’roll band to go into a recording studio and produce.
If nothing else, unlike most “mass produced” pop music they used their power to go into the studio and do whatever the hell THEY wanted to. Want to loop a tape? Sure. I am the eggman? Why not. Number 9? Alright. Unnecessary Italian? Throw that in there.
And to think that they did it, start to finish in seven years? Wow, just wow. Can you imagine one of today’s boy bands doing anything even remotely comparable?