Home Forums Chat Forum Bands/Artists that are strangely successful….and it’s unwarranted

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 115 total)
  • Bands/Artists that are strangely successful….and it’s unwarranted
  • ElShalimo
    Full Member

    Coldplay

    Ed blummin’ Sheeran

    Adele – faux cockeney princess

    Duran Duran

    Stereophonics – 2 good songs

    Over to you

    19
    kelvin
    Full Member

    This is just going to be a mean thread.

    1
    ElShalimo
    Full Member

    You can view it that way. Or join in

    Def Leppard – why?

    15
    crossed
    Free Member

    This is just going to be a mean thread.

    It’s just gonna be a thread of bands people don’t like. Kind of pointless really.

    plumber
    Free Member

    Def Leppard – why?

    Mutt Lange

    8
    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    ‘Unwarranted’ is totally subjective. Is your question really ‘what successful bands don’t you personally like’?

    1
    ElShalimo
    Full Member

    Some artists are huge despite not being great singers, musicians or dancers. It’s often inexplicable.

    whatgoesup
    Full Member

    Taylor Swift would be my contribution.

    Aside from a couple of memorable songs (“Shake It Off” is actually quite good) it’s all bland, saccharine pop yet she’s somehow wildly popular. I don’t understand.

    13
    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    I don’t understand.

    That some people like different music to you?

    4
    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Def Leppard – why?

    Mutt Lange

    High ‘n’ Dry, Pyromania, Hysteria – epic albums of their time.

    andylc
    Free Member

    Def Leppard have written some great songs so I’m not with that one.
    Robbie Williams on the other hand is a shocking singer, he sings painfully out of tune live.

    6
    joshvegas
    Free Member

    Some artists are huge despite not being great singers, musicians or dancers. It’s often inexplicable.

    Yeah. Like Bob Dylan, leonard cohen, the ramones, wreckless eric, billy bragg…

    JonnyC
    Free Member

    Michael Jackson

    Renée & Renato

    paddy0091
    Free Member

    There are many, but a couple immediately come to mind:

    Frank SHOUTY Turner. Thought I’d heard the back of him until he appeared on 6 recently.

    Kaiser Chiefs – a (bad) pub band that some moron signed.

    1
    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Any one who got famous from being on the X Factor or any other show of that ilk. Taylor Swift is a bloody good song writer and a savvy business woman. Ed Sheeran, not for me but the lad can play guitar well and write a decent tune. He’s just a bit bland and safe.

    NWA and other gangsta rap for me. You had A Tribe Called Quest, De La Soul, Blackalicious, Public Enemy etc with a genuine message and something worthwhile to say. Yet the middle class pretending to be gang members become the most popular and we end up with the shitty mainstream rap we have now. Meanwhile the good stuff is the underground stuff. Utterly backwards.

    4
    Rubber_Buccaneer
    Full Member

    It doesn’t feel right having a thread like this without DezB

    2
    ads678
    Full Member

    Some artists are huge despite not being great singers, musicians

    So you’re saying Ed Sheeran isn’t a good musician?

    Can you explain what makes some a good musician?

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    What happened to DezB?

    2
    Rubber_Buccaneer
    Full Member

    He got fed up and buggered off. Hopefully doing something more fun but I think he’d have loved a slagging off any music I’ve ever heard of thread 😀

    sirromj
    Full Member

    Most of the **** warbling you hear on the mainstream radio stations.

    Agree on Sheeran.

    1
    sirromj
    Full Member

    Didn’t he come back under a different guise?

    Or was that someone pretending?

    sirromj
    Full Member

    Renée & Renato

    BoardinBob
    Full Member

    but the lad can play guitar well

    Not really. Very basic playing. Relies heavily on his looper. He’s a very basic player

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Ed Sheeran – Supermarket Flowers. I can barely listen to that song without it getting dusty.

    dartdude
    Free Member

    Foo fighters

    Abba or is it beegees all same oh and Slade ohhh and that ska band though not The Specials!

    wbo
    Free Member

    Anything climbing to be punk and released after 1979. Punk is dead

    New Order – tedious.  JOY Division, except they’re not really popular so don’t count.  People pretend to like them.

    Happy Mondays.  Dennis and Lois is good, everything else is like a kindegarden band

    3
    Daffy
    Full Member

    Not really. Very basic playing. Relies heavily on his looper. He’s a very basic player

    Then you’ve seen a very limited amount of his playing.  Most folks I know who play either personally or professionally grudgingly acknowledge that he’s both skilled and versatile with an excellent knowledge of chords, technique, melody and ingenuity.  Many of them don’t like his music either, but don’t dismiss his skill either instrumentally, vocally or creatively.

    Swift and Sheeran are similar in this, though I’d argue that Sheeran is more creative and Swift has better range.

    What’s more is that they both seem to be genuinely nice, happy, fun people who really enjoy what they do.

    Anything climbing to be punk and released after 1979. Punk is dead

    Bollocks – Greenday started in 1987.

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Not really. Very basic playing. Relies heavily on his looper. He’s a very basic player

    He can pen a catchy tune though. The best and most interesting imo from his generation is Ben Howard. A very good player who did a Pearl Jam and refused to play the industry game and does his own thing. All his albums are interesting and a bit different

    4
    windyg
    Free Member

    The Beatles, never understood their success

    1
    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Anything climbing to be punk and released after 1979. Punk is dead

    Ooh! The Sex Pistols. Shite manufactured boy band. Punk my arse.

    13
    winston
    Free Member

    Lol at anyone dismissing Taylor Swift as untalented or that her success is unwarranted. Just to take one example, her latest tour set list is three hours long. Throughout the concert she sings her own music and lyrics in tune, whilst dancing non stop to difficult routines and basically holds up to 100,000 people in the palm of her hand – for 3 hours….night after night. She burns as many calories as a marathon runner whilst holding a tune and performing in front of more people than she can see.

    But yeah, no talent

    5
    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Bands/Artists that are strangely successful….and it’s unwarranted because I dislike them.

    FTFY.

    3
    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Lol at anyone dismissing Taylor Swift as untalented or that her success is unwarranted.

    Agreed.

    And I’m not a fan. But she’s got talent.

    ads678
    Full Member

    Well if we’re going down that route, banksy!

    sofaboy73
    Free Member

    Frank SHOUTY Turner. Thought I’d heard the back of him until he appeared on 6 recently.

    Kaiser Chiefs – a (bad) pub band that some moron signed.

    in interesting, I put frank on the other thread as not as big as he should be, but I guess if we all liked the same stuff it would be dull and the world would be ruled by ed sheeran

    fully agree on kaise chiefs though

    2
    jimw
    Free Member

    I never understood the appeal of Oasis. I genuinely think I can only name one song of theirs off the top of my head. I am aware that I might be in a minority on this one

    didnthurt
    Full Member

    it’s all bland, saccharine pop yet she’s somehow wildly popular. I don’t understand.

    I think you’ve just described McDonald’s or any other thing that is consistently not shit but not great either.

    1
    dc1988
    Full Member

    Dua Lipa, constantly on the radio but the majority of her music is incredibly bland and similar

    didnthurt
    Full Member

    My era, the charts were full of Stock Aitken Waterman manufactured pop. It was truly bland sameness.

    But if you look at the charts from the 50’s and early 60’s the charts were also full of derivative songs, and loads of covers.

    I just think that a lot of people have terrible taste, my mom for example loves Barry Manilow and Kenny G. But then she also loves Motown so maybe not all bad.

    didnthurt
    Full Member

    I never understood the appeal of Oasis. I genuinely think I can only name one song of theirs off the top of my head. I am aware that I might be in a minority on this one

    They came out the year I left school and started work, it’s just timing for me. I’d never even heard of the likes of the Stone Roses and they were only a few years before. Probably apt that one of their albums was called Standing on the Shoulder of Giants. But there were loads of very average bands that got caught up in the Brti-pop era that were no where near as good as Oasis IMO. Elastica and The Lightning Seeds come to mind.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 115 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.