Anyone have any experience to share on if the ratios and spacing on these make much difference or you find either preferable at all? (geek alert)
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1st
11-13-15-17-19-22-25-28-32-36-42-50 – SRAM
10-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-33-39-45-51 – Shimano
5th is the same on both. The lower gears on the Shimano are larger/easier, the higher ones smaller/harder, and the spacing at the lower-end is notably different.
The 5-6 gap is 1T larger on the Shimano, then the subsequent gaps are the same (teeth-wise) on both so each gear on the Shimano is 1T smaller/harder. That’s by 4% for 6th, rising to 10% for 12th.
SRAM has a big 8T (19%) 1-2 gap followed by smaller 6/4/4 gaps to get to 5th. Shimano has more even gaps of 6/6/6/5 but they are larger due to the absence of that big first gap – instead you get 18% gaps for both 3-4 and 4-5. The actual ratios below 5th are all easier on the Shimano though.
Not sure what to think as I haven’t ridden either yet and might not be able to try both. Seems the Shimano is better for hard climbs in 1st-3rd but you might not get as much use out of 11th and 12th depending on your usage/chainring/wheel size. If you rarely use 1st/2nd maybe SRAM is more suitable, and just occasionally be in a slightly-off gear (or stuck in 1st below that big gap) on those hard climbs.
I found this in a Shimano XT review from Pinkbike:
As explained to me by a secret development rider, Shimano’s 18-percent jump from the 33 to a 39 was chosen to keep the first nine steps as close as possible, while segregating the three largest cogs (clustered in even, six-tooth jumps), specifically as climbing gears. SRAM’s gearing, on the other hand, was intended for riders who prefer a more sequential gearing progression across the cassette. True or not, Eagle and XT cassettes have distinctly different personalities on trail.