170mm or 175mm cran...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] 170mm or 175mm cranks whats the differance?????????????????????????????????????

19 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
139 Views
 taka
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

just about to buy myself some deore hollow tech 11 ones but there's 170mm and 175mm ones whats the difference and which one should i go for?

tom


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:43 pm
 deft
Posts: 583
Free Member
 

5mm


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:44 pm
 dano
Posts: 41
Free Member
 

its the crank arm length... i always have 175, but some companies have the shorter for small bikes and the bigger for med and large frame sizes... track bikes also have smaller ones to get the clearence!


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:45 pm
 taka
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

175mm it is then i think on a 20" inbred?


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:46 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Damn, I wanted to say "about 5mm".


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No rider, except the incredibly sensitive, can notice. Go for whichever you like.


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:51 pm
Posts: 106
Free Member
 

170mm if you're short and/or a spinner.
175mm if you're tall and/or a masher.

One of each if you're SFB.


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is a website somewhere on the net (might be on the Sheldon Brown site) that has a calculator that works out what size cranks you need all you have to do is put your inside leg measuremnet in in mm I did it and I need 173 mm cranks looked everywhere and no one sells them


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 5:57 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I'm a short spinner - got 175's on my older bike and 170's on my newer bike.

170's more efficient, more comfortable, faster and much, much smoother. Eliminates those 'pedal under the chin' deadspots for the short-legged.

People who say that they can't tell the difference won't be shorties (I'm about 5 foot 6 inches tall) everyone I've spoken to who's made the change will never change back - it's like night and day.

Ms Spanner is about the same height as me but has longer legs - she doesn't like the 170's and prefers the 175's.


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 6:04 pm
Posts: 24367
Full Member
 

you can get 172.5 though Pantsonfire


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One of each if you're SFB.

after the kindness of [b]HTTP404[/b] I now have matching length cranks - not that it feels any different :o) According to a sports physio, most men under 6' are better suited by 170mm, particularly if they're long in the torso like me 🙂


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Or read another website 🙂


 
Posted : 27/07/2009 6:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it's like night and day

not to me 🙂


 
Posted : 28/07/2009 11:21 pm
Posts: 2604
Free Member
 

[i]"I now have matching length cranks"[/i]

OMG! 😯

Like I said - consistently silly..

SFB - you're awesome! 😀


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]No rider, except the incredibly sensitive, can notice. Go for whichever you like. [/i]
nonsense


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I agree. Most riders unless they're entirely devoid of feeling should be able to tell the difference.


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 6:57 am
Posts: 25868
Full Member
 

I've ridden between 165 and 180.

32-33" legs

can tell the difference between the extremes but it doesn't [i]make[/i] a difference


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:29 am
Posts: 10487
Free Member
 

I've got 170mm on my HT and 175mm on my FS, to be honest I can't tell the difference.


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used to have 182.5mm on my race BMX, I noticed the difference changing to 180mm.


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:40 am
Posts: 953
Free Member
 

[i]can tell the difference between the extremes but it doesn't make a difference
[/i]

of course it does


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:59 am