Home Forums Chat Forum 10% could not identify a sheep

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 148 total)
  • 10% could not identify a sheep
  • wwaswas
    Full Member

    I’m hoping this is an early April Fool;

    From ‘travelmole’;

    Over half of Brits polled by budget hotel chain, Travelodge, think visiting the countryside is boring.

    In the survey of 3,000 Brits, 53% of adults said there was nothing to see or do in Britain’s countryside.

    Even a fifth of British children find nature’s playground unexciting.

    For a third of the nation, the idea of taking a trip to the British countryside has not even crossed their mind.

    John Tribe, professor of tourism from University of Surrey said: “It is alarming news that over half of the nation thinks the British countryside is boring and there is nothing to do or see there.

    “Maybe this is because in the last decade Britons have preferred to holiday abroad and as a result; they have forgotten the UK is abundant with great rural holiday locations.”

    The study also tested the respondents’ knowledge of the Countryside Code and revealed:

    only 17% of adults admitted they knew the British Countryside Code.

    24% thought they had the right to pick wild flowers in the countryside (which they don’t).

    10% thought it was safe to eat all berries and fungus they found growing in the countryside.

    – 32% had difficulty identifying a pheasant

    – 22% could not identify a hare. One in 10 adults thought it was a deer

    – 12% of adults thought a stag was a reindeer

    – 10% could not identify a sheep

    – 42% could not identify an otter

    – 20% could not identify a weasel

    – 83% could not identify the common Bluebell flower

    – 44% could not identify the popular oak tree

    – 74% could not identify a horse chestnut tree

    – 71% could not identify a pine tree

    sc-xc
    Full Member
    noteeth
    Free Member

    53% of adults said there was nothing to see or do in Britain’s countryside

    You don’t miss what you don’t know.

    thomthumb
    Free Member

    what a bunch of thick **** we share this country with!

    – 22% could not identify a hare. One in 10 adults thought it was a deer

    eh?!!

    coffeeking
    Free Member

    It is indeed a worrying reflection of modern Britain.

    mudshark
    Free Member

    Keep them in their ignorance I say so they don’t spoil the green spaciousness….

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    I’m with Mudshark on this!

    samuri
    Free Member

    I agree, leaves more countryside for people who do like it.

    10% thought it was safe to eat all berries and fungus they found growing in the countryside.

    So we should be able to get rid of 10% of idiots quite easily 😉

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    10% could not identify a sheep

    To be fair. I couldn’t identify one with 100% certainity the morning after.

    thomthumb
    Free Member

    to add to this i know a guy, from putney, had never had contact with animals – i remember him thinking that a horse was a dangerous animal, “one kick your dead” not so much that that’s not true but how likely is a horse to kick you? – he viewed them like i view bears (probably as dangerous?)
    i also rember him shouting one day on a train “look, look sheep” i didn’t get it; he’d never seen them before. he is an intelligent chap tho – i suppose if he was from the same background but thick….

    AndyP
    Free Member

    – 22% could not identify a hare. One in 10 adults thought it was a deer

    eh?!!

    No Dougal, these are small. Those are far away.

    domino
    Full Member

    Yes, what Mudshark said. The more ignorant people that come to the countryside the more untidy they seem to make it – litter, noise and generally ignorant attitudes.

    Midnighthour
    Free Member

    A work collegue once seriously asked me what the purpose of an acorn was. (brought up in a city). Disbelief when I said it would turn into a tree if planted. I just dont know what schools teach, I really dont.

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    A swan can break a man’s arm you know.

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    I’m not sure what annoys me more – the fact that so many people haven’t learnt this sort of thing, or the fact that the “system” does not give them the chance to learn it

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    We had a Y2 school residential a couple of weeks ago – staying just outside Castleton, about 12 miles from the school. Most of the parents turned out on the Sunday to prepare for the week (making beds, getting food in etc – its a low budget week…)

    This is a ‘middle class’, good performing school in the middle of Sheffield.

    You would not believe how many parents were stood outside having a discussion along the lines of:
    “what are they going to do here for a week? there is nothing to do – look its just fields”
    “we have never been here before”
    “I wonder if there is a road up that mountain – looks like there is”
    “why are we sending the kids here?”
    “I hope there’s no mud – she hates mud”
    “There’s no TV!”
    .
    I then have a chat with local mum (we live ‘wrong’ side of Sheffied, S2) – about the week in Castleton. She had no idea where Castleton, Hope, Hathersage etc were and “Oh, I don’t go that far away” and “But its only fields and stuff”.
    🙄

    Trimix
    Free Member

    This is all good news – imagine if these stupid people were let loose in the countryside – havoc.

    Leave the ignorant blissfully unaware of what they are missing. All the more for us.

    Julian
    Free Member

    Extreme TK Maxxing is the only recreation some people have.

    coffeeking
    Free Member

    or the fact that the “system” does not give them the chance to learn it

    It’s nothing to do with “the system”, it’s the parents. I never learned these things at school, I was taken there by parents who appreciated it. If that isnt passed on to the next generation in this manner, no-one will give a damn and we have to “teach it” in school, to the loss of important educational things like maths and science.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    but if people don’t understand or care about “the countryside” then they will continue to not care about losing it which affects us all.

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    10% thought it was safe to eat all berries and fungus they found growing in the countryside.

    they probably also think it’s safe to smoke, drink alcohol and eat burgers and chips <<<shivver>>>

    Trimix
    Free Member

    I vote for a culling of the stupid and obese. Or at least the sterilisation of them.

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    I vote for a culling of the stupid and obese

    I vote for ridicule of eugenicists

    what penalty might we apply to the obese but clever who should know better ? I have a particular STWer in mind…

    Pippin
    Free Member

    And we wonder why government policy is so skewed

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    Trimix for PM!

    chvck
    Free Member

    – 22% could not identify a hare. One in 10 adults thought it was a deer

    eh?!!

    No Dougal, these are small. Those are far away.

    That almost resulted in tea being sprayed all over my laptop 😆

    footstomper
    Free Member

    10% could not identify a sheep

    Unless your from Wales where 100% of the male population knows one by name 😉

    Trimix
    Free Member

    Eugenicists got a bad name from the Nazis. They were a bit over the top. But whats wrong with cutting out the bad bits of society – we do that now with fundamental preachers, illegal immagrants, sex offenders. Doctors remove tumors, cancer, provide screening for health / non healthy babies. You can pay for DNA tests on your unborn, you can pay for donated eggs and sperm with a history of breeding. Only a few years ago America stopped sterilising mental health inmates.

    Cure the cureable, remove the uncurable. When you cant patch your innertube anymore you bin it. Some even go as far as to go tubeless ! Lets adopt that approach in society.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    ‘kin ‘ell Trimix that’s a bit ott.

    Lootenant
    Free Member

    Eugenicists got a bad name from the Nazis. They were a bit over the top. But whats wrong with cutting out the bad bits of society – we do that now with fundamental preachers, illegal immagrants, sex offenders. Doctors remove tumors, cancer, provide screening for health / non healthy babies. You can pay for DNA tests on your unborn, you can pay for donated eggs and sperm with a history of breeding. Only a few years ago America stopped sterilising mental health inmates

    Now that should have a thread of its own…

    Stoner
    Free Member

    on the other hand…

    I was on my way into London last week when I overhead a couple of blinding lines from some mum from the shires bringin her kids in to the natural history museum.

    [looking up at Trellick Tower]

    “Oh my god, I cant believe people really live in there!”

    “Now be really careful in London. It’s full of dangerous people. They’re from all walks of life”

    PSML 🙂

    But on the whole, I agree, urban ignorance keeps the numbers down in the countryside 🙂 . It’s just a pity they have they have the right to vote on rural only matters (touch-paper lit…)

    neverfastenuff
    Free Member

    The rest of the people asked thought the countrside was for fly-tipping

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    “Eugenicists got a bad name from the Nazis. They were a bit over the top.”

    I think that wins the modest understatement of the week award 🙂

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    When you cant patch your innertube anymore you bin it

    really? I’ve never experienced this…

    But whats wrong with cutting out the bad bits of society

    but everyone has a different idea of who that might be (usually excluding themselves), and the fatties have the advantage that they only have to sit on you to remove you from the competition – which even the dimwitted ones can manage, whereas your eugenic knifework is unlikely to reach vital organs 🙁

    Trimix
    Free Member

    The planets too full of people, Im looking for ways to reduce the population.

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    Im looking for ways to reduce the population.

    allegedly “suicide is painless”

    Sponging-Machine
    Free Member

    I’ve suggested (in conversation) that every boy should be ‘clipped’ at birth. Then you have to meet a number of social parameters/criteria (job, education, somewhere to live, etc.) for the sterilisation to be reversed and then to be given the chance to produce offsping. That should remove the wheat.

    Not actually my opinion, but just an opinion.

    As for culling obese people, my BMI is presently 29.9kg/m2. When I was playing rugby (and considerably leaner than I am now) it was ~33. I’m glad Trimix never came to watch me play. Sniper in the grandstand anyone?

    RudeBoy
    Free Member

    Let’s get this into context, before we start calling for death camps and the like…

    When planning a holiday, many people would opt for a city break, over a rural one. Because there is actually more to do, that people can relate to. If you’ve lived all your life in a city, like most people in this country, then apart from a bit of open space, fresh air and quietness, what is the immediate appeal? You’re actually more likely to see wildlife in a city, in parks and that. Plenty of foxes, rats, boids, etc.

    Understand that this is from a survey carried out by a Hotel chain. So, the control group are probbly mostly bods who use these places to visit other cities. So it’s hardly representative of the whole population.

    If you are unused to the myriad pleasures and speriences to be found in the Great Outdoors, then you may not be best placed to take advantage of them. For many city-dwellers, their sperience of t’countrysoide is limited to school fieled trips. which tend to be a bit boring, usually. So, they tend not to be too keen to go back.

    Another factor is cost. Rural holidays in Britain are a lot more spensive than a couple of weeks in Torremolinos, or a long weekend in Prague, or Amsterdam. Then there’s the added cost of equipment for things like canoeing, mtbing, climbing, etc. Granted, just going for a walk needunt cost a fortune, but that seems a bit staid and boring, for many people brought up on the thrills and spills of the big city. Plus you need a certain amount of sperience and skill, to be able to enjoy certain rural pursuits.

    And ime, contrary to popular myth, country folk aren’t always happy and jolly and welcoming. TBH, a lot of them despise ‘Townies’, who bring noise, trouble and litter with them. I’ve experienced some really narrow-minded attitudes from some people, whilst in some rural villages etc. And then there’s the snobbery; ‘oh you’re not from round ‘ear, are you? Therefore, you must be weak, feeble and stupid, whilst we are clever and rugged and brave’.

    Personally, I feel a large part of the problem stems from the insular, territorial attitudes of far too many people in this country. Many rural folk resent ‘others’ from enjoying ‘their’ bit of nature, and are therefore very protective about it. And a lot of Townies will simply not feel that the countryside belongs to them, so won’t feel any particular sense of empathy or understanding of the rural way of life.

    I mean, those very attitudes are often borne out on this forum; plenty of people resent city ATGNI types, and have a superior attitude over ‘weekend warriors’.

    Maybe we should all start seeing the country side as ‘ours’, collectively; something for us all to share and enjoy.

    What’s Mine is mine, what’s Ours is Nobodies…

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    country folk aren’t always happy and jolly and welcoming

    tell us something we don’t know :o)

    cuckoo
    Free Member

    Keep them in their ignorance I say so they don’t spoil the green spaciousness….

    The problem with this is that most of these ignorant **** seem to end up with a job in the planning department. Then when it comes to the argument “you shouldn’t build that there because it is ripping up all that mature woodland/hedges/ponds etc.”, their response is so ****ing what who’s bothered about that **** anyway. Everyone knows we need another massive out of town supermarket/shopping complex/industrial warehouse/4 lane motorway etc.

    That is what seems to happen near where I live anyway.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 148 total)

The topic ‘10% could not identify a sheep’ is closed to new replies.