[Closed] zoo or no zoo

thought they lived longer in zoos actually but cant recall.
Essentially cruel. Very very nice cage but still basically prison. Do lots of great conservation work but I think it i spehaps th emodern day equivalent of the freak show????
Difficult issue but can see both ways

Should a cheetah be in an enclosure the size of a tennis court, having meat chucked at it or hunting on the Serengeti? Hmm, lets have a debate...

Mixed,
there are many animals that can be housed perfectly well in captivity, and live way beyond their natural lifespans. Reptiles, amphibians fish, and many invertebrates being good examples.
many of these are also animals that could benefit the most from conservation efforts, as there may, for smaller species at least be just enough enviroment left to re-introduce them.
The problem is, the public won't generally care or more importantly pay, to see these creatures- they want the lions, tigers and elephants etc, Animals that have drawn the short straw of being contemporaries of humans.

I thought most zoo animals these days are rescued; orphaned animals, taken from poachers, bred in captivity etc.
so they never really had a shot in the wild and if they were given their freedom now they wouldn't last 5 minutes

tribal,
The cheetah is a good example of where zoos potentially can help.
Cheetahs are all descended from a surviving population so small,and now so inbred that they can even accept skin grafts without rejection.
All it would take would be a single disease, with the immune system homogeneity they have, and all wild cheetahs could be wiped out.
The fact that zoos have captive Acinonyx jubatus may be the only hope the species has.

Zoo's do a lot of good work some animals would be gone without them although some of that is of our making. But no a polar bear should not be kept in San Diego zoo in half the enclosure the panda gets.

i have no moral objection but everytime I go I come away feeling a bit sad.

One of the brutal realities is that the only animals and plants that are now able to truly thrive are the ones that are able to live alongside, and be useful to humans.
Wherever there is a conflict, or even a suspicion of one, the wild animal loses.
There is an argument that the ONLY future for the likes of big cats, giant pandas, elephants and rhinos is FULL domestication into captivity.

I have seen nothing sadder than an enclosure full of chimps. They are as smart as half the punters on here. I have not been to a zoo since and I will never go to another.

[i]i have no moral objection but everytime I go I come away feeling a bit sad. [/i]

Well put. I don't like them, but they do a lot of good. I know that sounds daft, but......

Looking at this forum is like looking at the mollusc enclosure.

Again, I know what you mean, but lots of the curators of zoos would rather concentrate on productive, meaningful conservation work with species who's needs can be met.
But conservation efforts cost money and the public who provide the money, want megafauna, primates and other animals that they can identify with, not Partulina snails or Dendrobates frogs.
It is to some degree the hypocracy and disinterest of the punters that forces many good zoos into persevering with the same creatures that they get criticised for keeping.

BTW, does anyone think that STW should put more effort into conservation of their hamster collection?
Or have they loaned some of theirs out to stud?. 🙂

ZOO's work. They need to be a bit different to what is often a prison for animals though.
[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisent ]An example of how animal preservation was once done and will never be again, sadly.[/url]

reading that bit about the wisent you have to wonder if it was worth it. There is so little genetic variability there fate would appear sealed in the same way as cheetahs.

I have seen nothing sadder than an enclosure full of chimps. They are as smart as half the punters on here

😆