Forum menu
What car do you dri...
 

[Closed] What car do you drive, and why?

Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

much like john a hate box with a hyundai badge on it ....

hyundai lantra - why . it was free and my escorts electrics were shit and it had to go

its been in the family since new and its only 9 years old or 42000 miles..... within 3 weeks it broke down and i had to ride to SSWC instead of driving my car ... ECU and fuel pump blew up ...

ITs done 70000 miles now including my dad using it while i was away in nz. Soon as i get a decent job and get some money together ill be replacing it with something that doesn rattle like a bag of spanners and has some room in it ...

the boots tiny - id doesnt fit a bike inside(Even with the seats down) unless i take the wheels and seat and turn the bars !

HATE IT !


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Loads of silly cars but best is worth nothing - P reg Honda Accord 2.2 VTEC with 215k miles on the clock. Goes like stink, gives up to 40mpg and never goes wrong. Amazing.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another thing to note, I intended to look after this C-Max being the closest thing I've had to an actual new car - sadly the rear is almost always void of seats and looks like the front of craberry's landy!

The wife sarcastically suggested we might as well have got a van... to which I reply, "I did suggest a van!"


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Bout 1300kg I think.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

P Reg Fiat Cinquecento. Reason being, I don't really like cars and this was as cheap and as minimalist as I could find on eBay (yes really)


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:11 pm
Posts: 1682
Full Member
 

52 plate 1.4 Honda Civic, bought 2nd hand about 6 years ago.

Why? Because it can fit bikes and snowboards and a load of other stuff with ease, feels solid, drives fine, couldn't be bothered looking at any more cars and everyone said Hondas were brilliant and reliable.

Fully agreed until a couple of months ago, when a Bad Noise started coming out of the gearbox. Had to replace the clutch and gearbox because "a bad set of bearings" wore out. Honda weren't interested when I contacted them about it, suggesting that was only to be expected in a seven year old car.

Intend to keep the car until it dies. Not sure if my next one will be a Honda.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mitsubishi evo 8 fq300, although its a little bit more than 300bhp now!!

WHY?

Because everyone assumes I should have a small willy but its nice to buck a trend!!

😀


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not needed stumpy, but just interested if people know!
We'd argue for days over 1kg on a bike....but on a car 100kg either way is generally not an issue.
It's rarely mentioned in reviews.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:37 pm
Posts: 11639
Free Member
 

ooOOoo - Member

Without Googling....
How many of you know how much you car weighs?

Between 1500 and 1600kg for the Mondeo, and about 2100kg for the Iveco.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1200-1250kg i think which is about 160 bhp/t


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Skoda Octavia, 4X4 turbo estate.

Why? Wanted a low mileage estate car for four grand that wasn't a Pug 407 or mondeo. Or diesel.

Plus it's quick. And I can do power slides in fields or on beaches. Braaaap!


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 8:11 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Prius? Jeesus Christ. Its the concept of wearing the badge of 'look me' rather than the actual inception 🙄

Honda Jazz? A beaut. An absolute beaut.

Oops, I also forgot- I also own a 306 and another MX5 1.8 Phoenix on the way 😀


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I got a Fiat Doblo
Great for 3 bikes riders and kit for a weekend away and also not too bad a lugging the family about.
50mpg 1.9 diesel
kick ass!!!!


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 9:35 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Prius? Jeesus Christ. Its the concept of wearing the badge of 'look me' rather than the actual inception

WTF is that supposed to mean?

Nice big comfy car, as clean as a tiny teeny thing, cool technology, loads of toys - what's wrong with that?


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Rich-6 How the hell are you getting 46mpg? I've not seen better than 36 out of my 172 and that was being veeery careful! Must change these lead boots of mine

It'll do me 46 on a run i think she did 42 on my recent trip to scotland with 2 bikes on the roof and fuly loaded in the back with a weeks worth of food/ beer clothing for me and the missus, Sat @50mph all the way there

Mmmm, I've just found the reset button and it did 57mpg on the way to work today (by driving very slowly and coasting a bit) so it seems that my 37mpg best was because the average had some more "spirited' driving to consider!

Of course now I'll have to try and beat your low of 23mpg 😉


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

an ex police honda civic type-S which I bought for 3k. nippy, comfy, reliable but uses too much petrol for my liking


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nissan Pathfinder.

Why? Because not all roads in Aus are surfaced! It's also big enough for the family, bike, dog, etc. Also goes towards off-setting the greenhouse gas that I don't produce when I am on the MTB 😆


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 10:34 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

by driving very slowly and coasting a bit)

Coasting doesn't save fuel in a modern car (if by coasting you mean putting it in neutral and rolling). Lifting off saves fuel.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 10:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Vauxhall Combo van...

....because work supplied it and it's WAY better than the Citroen Berlingo

(can't complain though, it easily fits two bikes n all the kit in the back without needing to remove wheels etc)


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 10:39 pm
Posts: 47
Free Member
 

I drive a KIa Sedona, and Jeeks it weighs 2200kg empty!!! Heavier than Spookys Iveco!

It gets seven people in manages 32mpg on a run and 30round town, its been totally reliable until 6 weeks ago when the cambelt snapped (5000 miles after an english mechanic changed it and they've just told me today that the bills going to cost €2800 I am not looking forward to paying that bill at all.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Because it is a lot of fun, has character and isn't the same as everyone elses.
It can be a pain but I love it.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 9102
Free Member
 

R-reg diesel Mondeo.

It was all I could afford at the time that would carry bikes well, decent on motorsway and reasonable mpg. Rear seats live in the garage, will take 5 bikes with just wheels and seatposts out and two people. Couldn't afford the estate. Now done 135K, 40 of them with me, lasted longer than the other three I've had put together. Shame it's woefully slow, used to drive a diesel Landy and they are about the same speed, overtaking is a big adventure.

Wnat one like Cranberry's next, ideally a V8 with an LPG conversion. Can fit bed and bikes in that.


 
Posted : 15/09/2009 11:36 pm
 5lab
Posts: 7926
Free Member
 

diesel mondeo estate. With wheels and pedals off it'll take 5 people and 5 bikes *inside* the car at a squeeze. does the same with 4 and full weekend gear. 45mpg, cost a grand 4 years/40,000 miles ago and has never gone wrong. girlfriend mashed it into a curb causing some damage and I don't really care. Fitted aftermarket cruise control and it'll just sit on the motorway till i get to wales\scotland\devon\wherever


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 12:47 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

isn't the same as everyone elses.
It can be a pain

What price "individuality" eh? 🙂


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 5:24 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Buzz lightyear - was it a plainclothes coppa car or blues n twos? Whats the history?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 7:43 am
Posts: 466
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

328i, because it's fast and practical, and lots of RWD fun.

But mainly because a mate was selling it for £200 😀

Cheers, Rich


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 8:43 am
Posts: 2554
Free Member
 

[i]molgrips - Member

by driving very slowly and coasting a bit)

Coasting doesn't save fuel in a modern car (if by coasting you mean putting it in neutral and rolling). Lifting off saves fuel.
[/i]

Can anyone explain this for me please. I am not dissagreeing and the fuel computer certainly backs up this theory but how does it work. Surely when you are coasting your revs have dropped and your engine is not putting much fuel in. Surely when lifting off you are doing a similar thing but your revs have actually increased???

Yours confused 🙂


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 10:32 am
Posts: 466
Full Member
 

The difference between coasting in neutral and lifting off is the amount of fuel which the management system has to inject.

When coasting, the engine needs fuel to keep it turning over, albeit not very much, as it isn't doing any work.

When lifting off, the computer stops injecting any fuel, and the engine is turned over purely by the the drivetrain.

This is certainly the case in most modern fuel injected vehicles, although with carbs I suspect it won't be quite so dramatic.

Cheers, Rich


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 11:09 am
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

but on a car 100kg either way is generally not an issue.

100kg on a 1200kg car makes a pretty hefty difference. In fact the only difference between the 306 HDi and the 406HDi estates is about 250kg, but it knocks 10mpg off the combined fuel economy.

I must be úber-geeky - I've weigh-bridged my Celica before and after some weight removal lol 🙂


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 11:54 am
Posts: 2554
Free Member
 

Thanks rich. Always wondered why it was so and that makes sense.

Hey Rickmiester, you have mail. Pop in for a coffee and we can compare motors.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Skoda Octavia 2.0 TDi

Its cheaper than an Audi/VW but basically the same car.
It has a huge MTB friendly boot.
It is fun to drive.
Plently of room for sprog and all sprog equipment.
It has an MP3 connection for my phone.
It has cruise control for motorway driving.

Ford Puma 1.7i

Its is very fun to drive.
It does 40mpg when driving normally.
It doesn't do 40mpg if you drive it fast (but has grin content involved).
It still takes the sprog but not much sprog equipment.
It has a small boot (not MTB friendly) but will take a bike with the seats folded down.
It was very cheap.
The Steve McQueen advert was very cool.

Regards


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 3:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Volvo T5 estate. comfy, takes bikes and all our kit. looks like a normal boring car but can really move when you want it to! fuel consumption not so good.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 137
Free Member
 

Honda F-RV
Can get bikes in back with family of four and all kit for long weekend away/holiday.
Fuel consumption not great but no worse than old Ford Focus it replaced.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Porsche 911 C2S

Because it's got 4 seats, reasonable(ish) boot, can take 2 bikes on the roof and it's bloody gorgeous...


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:29 pm
 edd
Posts: 1390
Full Member
 

1999 - Subaru Forrester because it was about half the price of the next cheapest car that I could find in Dubai at AED 5,000 (about £850). It's 4 wheel drive so goes in the desert and the mountains. I can fit my bike in it without taking out the wheels and I can sleep in the back (yes I'm quite short).

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:35 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

lookout meesterbond - your penis size will be questioned any second!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Audi RS6

Because it holds bikes 2 kids and still burns off Meesterbond at the lights 😉

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

MMmmm V8


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 5:13 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I've got one of these, a Daewoo Nexia:
1500cc of throbbing four cyclinder power, ready & willing to call me 'Master'.

[img] [/img]
Anyone who knows me will confirm that mine is in nowhere near as good condition as this example 😀

It's called Shedric.

It was given to me by my cousin. She lives near a particularly dodgy boozer and the regulars had shown their appreciation of such a fine car by walking over the top of it after leaving the pub. Jesus, everyone's a critic these days.

Never broken down or failed an MOT. Can get two bikes and a weeks worth of camping kit into it. Not one straight panel on it.

Never had a car that was worth more than my bike and believe me, I've had some really cheap bikes!

To drive, it's even worse than you could possibly imagine. 🙂 I love it.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 6:54 pm
Posts: 47
Free Member
 

I like the opposites of these last two posts! Throbbing V8 and straight after a knackered Nexia!

I like the style of the Nexia actually.

Its transport nothing more nothing less


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

PePPer, you obviously are an individual possessing exquisite taste.

A grand and it's yours. Very rare now, potential collectors item etc.
AND I have all the original bits of trim that have fallen off over the last few years. 😉


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 10:08 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

100kg on a 1200kg car makes a pretty hefty difference.

Hmm.. I got one of my best runs in the Prius with close to 200kg of passengers in the back. Normally, you're hard pushed to tell if the car's loaded up or not in terms of mpg. Performance and handling are affected though clearly.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 10:09 pm
Posts: 833
Full Member
 

V70 4WD Turbo - Because it's effing fast, effing safe, handles well, is really comfy and has a simply massive boot. Perfect cyclists car.

Skoda Octavia 4WD Turbo - Because it is all of the above but about a third of the price


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 10:23 pm
Posts: 6
Full Member
 

Another Passat TDI estate here - Sport 170 though (so you can assume I only have a small knob).

Why - wanted an A4 (cockmobile) but it was too small, A6 far too expensive, depreciation on Mondeos was terrifying, never liked Vauxhalls especially Vectras and couldn't find an Accord or Mazda 6 on budget. Oh, and Octavias are pretty shabby in comparison to all of the above IMO.

Good - It's plenty quick enough, will fit 2 people, 4 bikes, 100 bottles of wine and three weeks of stuff inside without too many problems, does mid-40s if not driven hard (more if I take roofbars off) and low 40s if pwned down the autoroute at 130kph (mais oui, monsieur gendarme).

Bad - Boot is a crap shape seats up - struggle to get an MTB in even with wheels off and saddle out. It's not as fun to drive as the Focus I had before and it's a bit of a bugger to park on street and manoeuver in tight spaces but other than that hard to fault.

Edit - probably weighs about a tonne and a half.

MountainMutant wins so far as far as I am concerned 🙂


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

audi 2.5 tdi avante
skoda superb 1.9tdi{taxi}
landrover defender2.5 tdi


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 12:46 am
Posts: 11639
Free Member
 

That 200kg of passengers in the Prius would have much less effect on mpg than in a normal car as the energy used to move the extra 200kg would be partly recouped through regenerative braking, rather than being wasted/heating up the brakes.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 5:01 pm
Page 5 / 6