Forum search & shortcuts

USB-c external hard...
 

USB-c external hard drives?

Posts: 2858
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#13536042]

Looking at my music/photo backups I realised my portable drive is 13years old so I  want to add another (also have some bare disks but even older and my caddy isn’t recognised by my Apple silicon macs.)

the 2013 hard drive has done weird arsed double micro usb connector that was an oddity at the time and I’ve never seen on any other device.  I’d like usb c thus time do I can connect directly to the macs but it seems all but the WD ultra and LaCie spinning disks still use that odd connection. And there are complaints online that the WD usb c socket is poor. 

any experience here? 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 1:37 pm
Posts: 3713
Full Member
 

Ignore what I wrote here, completely misread what was being asked


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 1:46 pm
Posts: 1785
Full Member
 

I got this one recently 

It came with a usb-c to usb-fancy-pants end and a usb-a to usb-fancy-pants end. 

 

https://amzn.eu/d/01xeeM59

 

So far it seems ok


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 1:48 pm
Posts: 18123
Full Member
 

Several Samsung T7s in use chez slowoldman.


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:12 pm
Posts: 1342
Free Member
 

the price of SSD's has gone to the moon fwiw. the NAS worthy drives have also gone up massively


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 2:17 pm
Posts: 118
Full Member
 

I have a 4GB Crucial SSD USB C drive, it's fast and tiny.


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 3:19 pm
Posts: 78862
Full Member
 

Posted by: b33k34

the 2013 hard drive has done weird arsed double micro usb connector that was an oddity at the time and I’ve never seen on any other device.

That's Micro USB 3.0.  It is a standard, just not a very widely used one (I've only ever seen it on external hard drives).

I may be inclined to take comments online with a pinch of salt because no-one ever hits the Internet to talk about how there's nothing wrong with the USB socket on their hard drive.  Maybe it'll fail if you're constantly ragging it about or bashing it side-on I guess.  I don't think I've ever unplugged the cable from mine, it lives in a pouch on my desk when not in use.

I can't really advise further as you lost me at "my Mac doesn't recognise USB" I'm afraid.  Off the top of my head I see no reason why a USB-C to uUSB3 cable wouldn't work but, eh, Apple.


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 3:26 pm
Posts: 42026
Free Member
 

I have a 4GB Crucial SSD USB C drive, it's fast and tiny.

Terabytes surely or have I stubbled back to the millennium?

the price of SSD's has gone to the moon fwiw. the NAS worthy drives have also gone up massively

I hadn't had any reason to look for a long time and JFC! Is old about 50 lightly used Samsung SSD's a while ago, I should have kept a hold of them and gone on a nice holiday with the proceeds! Maybe 4GB is worth bragging about again!

If you want something fairly simple but useful, just get some SATA SSD's and a USB-SATA cable.  Then if you ever want to build a NAS, or put them inside a machine instead it's easy.

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 3:31 pm
 Alex
Posts: 7787
Full Member
 

Samsung T7 here for similar. And the rugged version for when I go away and need to dump video files. Both just do the job, may not be the fastest but good value and seemingly robust.


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 3:35 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14177
Full Member
 

I was just looking this morning to buy an extra backup drive. My preference would be for one with a USB-C socket so I can just use all the USB-C to C cables I've got, and not the weird flat plug that's on this one https://amzn.eu/d/01xeeM59

Spinning drive deemed preferable to SSD by many, and not just for cost reasons (Google the gory details).


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 3:45 pm
Posts: 2858
Full Member
Topic starter
 

That Toshiba from Amazon looks like it will do the job.  Just accept the weird Micro usb connector and not fus about C-C.  It's only going to sit in a drawer and come out every 6 months for a back up. 

And that's a chunk cheaper than the other 4TB drives I was looking at.

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 9:23 pm
Posts: 78862
Full Member
 

Posted by: b33k34

 It's only going to sit in a drawer and come out every 6 months for a back up. 

Yeah, that being the case you're overthinking it.  If it's a drive for intermittent backups then who cares if it blows up tomorrow.

It's hard to go wrong with Toshiba kit, TBH.

 


 
Posted : 23/06/2026 11:01 pm
Posts: 3447
Full Member
 

I’ve a few USB3 Toshiba drives ranging from 1TB to 4TB. They’re OK for backups. 

for day to day use I like Samsung T7s. 

I use all of them with a Mac with USB-C to USB3 and USB-C to USB-C cables respectively. 

No need to go OTT on USB-C cables but make sure that they’re actually data cables. Often the very cheap ones are only useful for charging and have woeful data transfer rates. 

IDK what back up software you’re using OP but carbon copy cloner makes it a simple process on Mac. 


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 6:30 am
Posts: 8893
Full Member
 

I've got an Akasa USB C caddy with some sort of WD 2.5" drive in it.

Also have an Akasa 3.5" caddy with a USB C to B cable, which is the Time Machine drive.

Edit: Startech is your friend for weird and wonderful cables. This might be the one you need to connect the double micro-USB thing https://www.startech.com/en-us/cables/usb31cub1m


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 11:15 am
Posts: 2858
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Posted by: prettygreenparrot
 

IDK what back up software you’re using OP but carbon copy cloner makes it a simple process on Mac. 

I think I've used that in the past to do a migration from a spinning disk to an SSD in an old intel MacBook, but why would I use anything other than time machine for regular backups?

Up to now I've only been backing up video/photos/mp3 to disk - all my other files are on iCloud or Google Drive (I've just moved all our dropbox stuff to iCloud to simplify things).  I've set up a new Mac before from those and it works fine. 

 


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 4:16 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14177
Full Member
 

Posted by: b33k34

Just accept the weird Micro usb connector and not fus about C-C.  It's only going to sit in a drawer and come out every 6 months for a back up.

That's good if you store it in the drawer with the cable. if not you will be hunting high and low for the weird cable every time you want to do a backup. or at least I would be.


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 5:10 pm
b33k34 reacted
Posts: 78862
Full Member
 

Why would you not store them together?  It's not like you're going to use the cable for anything else.


 
Posted : 24/06/2026 6:58 pm
Posts: 4718
Full Member
 

I've got one of those Toshiba drives and from a sample size of one it's been fine! Pretty sure it came with a velour bag so that's your cable storage issue solved... 😃


 
Posted : 25/06/2026 6:42 am
Posts: 3447
Full Member
 

Posted by: b33k34

Posted by: prettygreenparrot
 

IDK what back up software you’re using OP but carbon copy cloner makes it a simple process on Mac. 

I think I've used that in the past to do a migration from a spinning disk to an SSD in an old intel MacBook, but why would I use anything other than time machine for regular backups?

Up to now I've only been backing up video/photos/mp3 to disk - all my other files are on iCloud or Google Drive (I've just moved all our dropbox stuff to iCloud to simplify things).  I've set up a new Mac before from those and it works fine. 

 

 

you may want to check what a backup policy is. Having one copy of files in iCloud isn’t it. Having a copy of photos on your Mac and a backup copy on one external hard drive, which may be at the same location, gets closer to backing up  

Time Machine relies on sparse bundles which aren’t always well kept by the software. While it looks cool and works fairly well, its methods have a few drawbacks for ‘proper’ backups and restoring that products like CCC avoid.  

It’s good that you’ve tested the ability to restore files from your current backup approach. It worked. This is much better than many folks do. 

 


 
Posted : 25/06/2026 7:26 am
Posts: 2858
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Posted by: prettygreenparrot

you may want to check what a backup policy is

I’m rusty, but I actually used to do DR/it security professionally.  Photos are irreplaceable. MP3 collection would be a huge hassle (lots of mixes, radio shows, rarities that aren’t on Spotify). 

Full copy on the Mac. 
Photos in iCloud (offsite)

backed up to hard drive  (and have always had >1 so there’s an older backup if current disk fails) 

As I say, I’m rusty - it’s 20+ years ago it was my job - and I was strategy/policy rather than execution so the details of software weren’t my bag even then  

Time Machine relies on sparse bundles which aren’t always well kept by the software. While it looks cool and works fairly well, its methods have a few drawbacks for ‘proper’ backups and restoring that products like CCC avoid.

What does “not always well kept” quantify as? How high is the risk? Would it affect a single copy or all? I’ve always been a pragmatist- better to have something that’s quick and easy so actually used that something with more friction. 


 
Posted : 25/06/2026 8:57 am