Twenty 20 England v...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Twenty 20 England v WI

22 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
67 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Anyone else watching this. England moving along nicely 112 after 14 overs Bhopara 48no -

Only thing is its absolutley hammering it down by me and should be hitting the Oval shortly

Match on here for those stuck in work http://www.ustream.tv/channel/barca3 password iraqgoals.net


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What did you say that for????


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 3210
Free Member
 

lol...kiss of death!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Double whammy there - Get Gayle out early and we still have a chance 🙄


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Its looking like WI need to get 47 of 5 overs (I think) - Does anyone understand the duckworth lewis method as sky and R5 don't seem to have a clue


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:03 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Sky looking heavy over my part of London, not too far over the river from the Oval. But, it looks like we might get a game out of it!

Lanesra, turn to Five Live Sports Extra and listen to Aggers and chums. They'll set you straight on the D/L!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No one understands duckworth lewis! Its like the Schleswig-Holstein Question

The Schleswig-Holstein question is so complicated, only three men in Europe have ever understood it. One was Prince Albert, who is dead. The second was a German professor who became mad. I am the third and I have forgotten all about it.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:08 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

TJ, I was referring to the SH Question earlier today! Marvellous!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm listening to Aggers and Co, they now seem to think its 9 overs to get 80 - I'm with TJ on this


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:12 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duckworth-Lewis_method ]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duckworth-Lewis_method[/url]

Think I can just about get the idea from that! Tis not looking good for England I fear.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Kevin, Liverpool, TMS inbox: "Why not play rock, paper, scissors? Easier to understand than Jack Duckworth\Martin Lewis method!"

🙂


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Gayle gone, excellent start


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:33 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Indeed, that Gayle wicket could be enough....but only [i]could[/i] be!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

16-3


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:37 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

Excellent, has this affected the duckworth lewis calculations yet then?

[edit] Nevermind, my Dad has just explained it to me properly, got it now!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Great stumping - 5 wickets down 35 needed of 22 balls


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:51 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Good glovework. A keeper needs to be a keeper first. If he can bat as well, all well and good, but the gloves come first. I suppose we were blessed by having had Stewart and Russell for so many years.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 6771
Full Member
 

Can't listen.......


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

It's getting edgy now.

Another wicket or as many dot balls as possible, please!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

16 from 12 ? Game over 🙁


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 8:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Why's he bowling short - yorkers at the stumps ffs


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 8:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It is 🙁


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 8:16 pm