MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch
[url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7970731.stm ]The Home Secretary's husband has said sorry for embarrassing his wife after two adult films were viewed at their home, then claimed for on expenses. [/url]
Hahahahaha! Hahahahaha!
Hahahaha!
Busted! He cheekily knocks one out over the Tug TV channels, thinks he got away with it, then gets busted across national media!
CFH in quick as a week in Barlinnie shocker. 😉
In fairness Flash, he wasn't caught trussed up like a chicken with an orange in his mouth and a bag on his head. These Lab people are clearly ameteurs.
Much as I have no love for these parasites, I can't see where it mentions a skin flick. Adult film is by definition an 18 certificate. This could be one of thousands. Please let's not divert from their pisstaking by salivating over a scandal. They are spending *OUR* money inappropriately feathering their own nests.
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if this was an "engineered" diversion.
Coyote in this instance it was euphemistic:
[i]An itemised receipt submitted to the Commons confirms the Virgin Media bill included two 18-rated items listed as “additional features”, which cost £5 each to view.
The company confirmed the phrase was a euphemism used on bills to spare the blushes of customers who access films with an “adult content”.[/i]
original story source
http://dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/91920/VIDEO-JACQUI-SMITH-PUT-ADULT-FILMS-ON-EXPENSES
I really couldn't give a crap about this or any of the other expenses crises
it's not even a drop in the ocean of public spending
there's far more real wasteage in public spending that should be concentrated on rather than a few minor perks that are deemed newsworthy and will cost much much more to rectify through drawing up of new policy