The other A&A.....
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] The other A&A...Art and Appreciation

48 Posts
30 Users
0 Reactions
109 Views
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Haven't had one for a while, have we?

Let's start with Peter Coffin's "Spiral Staircase", about the only good thing in the Saatchi Gallery in my opinion.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 7:58 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

IS that woman stroking a very skinny cat?


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 8:08 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Edward Hopper. New York Movie.

Don't know why but it gets me every time and i suppose that's what great art is supposed to do.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 8:13 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

"Gets" you? In what way?


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 8:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Dozens of even more amazing pieces [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/c215/ ]here[/url]
My favourite is [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/c215/3592690369/ ]this one[/url]. (can't link directly to his images)


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 8:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6984208089899995423#

It really doesn't come any better than this


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 8:48 am
Posts: 3706
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 9:14 am
Posts: 13113
Free Member
 

simonjf63 - Member
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6984208089899995423#

It really doesn't come any better than this

jools holland has aged badly, hasn't he.


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 9:33 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

finally a thread i can get behind

as an ex skateboarder i really appreciate art from skateboarders

Andy Howell

[img] [/img]

Ed Templeton

[img] [/img]

Mark Gonzales

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 9:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stanley Donwood

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 9:43 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 9:46 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

We try and make art a family and friends event.
Something we can share and experience together.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 10:11 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Jeff Koons - Puppy

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

This portrait of SS Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler is always a favourite, painted as it affectionately is, using brush strokes and candy colours.


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 10:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's so touching ernie. What a beautiful man...


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Uccello - [i]Hunt in the forest[/i]. Ashmolean Museum, Oxford.

Those trees...


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 10:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That Ucello pic - mid C15th going from the clothing.

The thing that tickles me about provenance and using paintings as such is that so many artists painted scenes from history (from their perspective) using contemporary (sp?) clothing & equipment, giving us ancient battles with protagonists wearing C15th armour etc.


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 10:43 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

This picture tugs at the heartstrings...

[img] [/img]
The end of a day, the end of an era as a proud ship is towed, lifeless, to its death.

And the detail and action in this is wonderful;
[img] [/img]
Velasquez, La Tela Real


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 10:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be brutally honest, I was hoping for photographs of nude / scantily clad ladies. I am V. Dissapointed.


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 11:17 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Anything else is pants... Even his judo moves


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 11:22 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Ummmm Flash how can something that is lifeless then die? 😉

My favourite painting, The Fighting Temeraire


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 4:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I love this.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 6:12 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
 

thats a beaut loula bella who's that by??

this always gets me so good yet equally frustrating.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 7:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Joaquin Sorolla Bastida - Valencian Fisherwomen
Im a big fan of all things Spanish, the colours are remarkably and the women so noble.


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 7:19 pm
Posts: 4417
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]
The portrayal of vulnerability in a windswept landscape just triggers something for me?

And the Rex Whistler mural at Plas Newydd
Tny bit here[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 9:55 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
 

The portrayal of vulnerability in a windswept landscape just triggers something for me?

pervert 😉


 
Posted : 18/09/2009 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

juan: nothing I have seen by Mark Rothko can possibly count as art.


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 5:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

julian, you're surely not referring to the juan's post above?


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 7:22 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Mark Rothko was an immensely talented artist. His work does need to be seen in the right setting but it definitely does count as very high quality art. To say it's not art is nonsense.


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:29 am
 Mark
Posts: 4287
Level: Black
 

To say it's not art is an opinion surely?
art is personal is it not? To say it's nonsense is an incontrovertible personal statement. If it means something to you then it's art. If it doesn't then it's paint on a canvas


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 10:36 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

A piece of art is what it is.
To like or dislike a piece is the opinion and does not stop the piece being what it is. I used to dislike Rothko paintings (for example). Now I like them. The paintings have'nt changed my opinion of them has. They have'nt suddenly become art. I like them and they are still pigment and canvas (that's partly what Rothko was getting at with his paintings).
There are no councils or bodies which decide what is or is not art. The viewer can have an opinion of likes and dislikes but to say if it is true or not based on that opinion is nonsense.


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 10:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

swiss01 - Member
julian, you're surely not referring to the juan's post above?

I was, but I have just realised that it's apparently someone else! Ooops!

Anyway, juan's post or not, I stand by what I said about Rothko.

How about some Paul Delvaux:

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just did an art tour of Italy, some of the most gorgeous paintings in Floreza and Roma.

Some good stuff on here too.

[img] [/img]

No camera!


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 2:31 pm
Posts: 163
Free Member
 

I read the 'what's up with the classifieds' thread before this one, and the two put together got me thinking.

There's something fishy about the mentality of 'its worth what someone is prepared to pay for it' relating of the selling of possibly overpriced bike bits when juxtaposed to the statement 'its not art'. Because in this case it is made about someone who sold pictures as art and made a living of it, taught 'art' as a job (and was paid for it), and had a larger presence in an industry, which despite its left wing leanings (and credentials; rothko was a communist party member for a time and was always sympathetic about issues of social justice) is a very big money industry.

In my humble opinion, if we imagine the same person making the two statements I think we get a very distinct 'picture' of conservative ideology: that while there is a full embrace of capitalism's determinist ability to determine 'value' over and above the needs of a community, the 'values' which are represented in the traditionally upper class concern of art, when challenged, can be defended by recourse to the ideals of the small elite section of society that have any say in determining 'what art is' despite the offending's work appropriation into a capitalist system.

I'm not saying full bore capitalism is good, that market forces should determine all things. Or that the expertise accumulated by the art-elite should be ignored. I'm just saying that there is a simple hypocrisy in such a position.

To restate, I'm not accusing anyone, I'm simply imagining a person making the two statements. i suspect i flatter myself by thinking anyone would be offended!


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i suspect i flatter myself by thinking anyone would be offended!

well, I've read your whole post twice and I still don't know what it means...


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I still don't know what it means..

No offence mate ........... but you probably shop at Tesco 😐


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

'm not saying full bore capitalism is good, that market forces should determine all things. Or that the expertise accumulated by the art-elite should be ignored. I'm just saying that there is a simple hypocrisy in such a position.

huh?


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:21 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

the BP Portrait Award at the National Portrait gallery is amazing

the winning portrait, I thought, was incredible - this was before I knew it was the winner
I found it quite hard to look at for longer than 10 seconds without feeling uncomfortable - no other piece of art has done that to me

[img] [/img]

some of the other portraits are unbelievable, and look like photographs, even close up


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but you probably shop at Tesco

well, I might but it's too far to walk...

Now I've read it a third time and I get a collection of loosely related statements in slightly jargonised language which don't actually seem to lead to a point


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

...and it's the last day of the exhibition tomorrow

this is not a photo

[img] [/img]

nor this

[img] [/img]

I like this one

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now I've read it a third time and........

I get the distinct impression that tom84's comment probably makes sense. However, it undoubtedly requires a great deal of attention and concentration to be fully understood ........... something which quite frankly I can't be bothered with.

.

BTW, I wasn't sure whether you were saying that you couldn't understand tom84's comment, or whether you couldn't understand the picture/artist he was referring to. So where do you shop then ?


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wasn't sure whether you were saying that you couldn't understand tom84's comment

yes

So where do you shop then ?

Sainsbury & Somerfield 🙂 The nearest Tesco is 5 miles away in Morecambe


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You need to get yourself a car mate.


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

brakes - I like what you've posted! I have absolutely no idea who did the image of the woman, nor of the image of the man. If you have details and would care to share them, I would very much appreciate that.

thanks in advance,
Jonathan


 
Posted : 19/09/2009 10:21 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 13566
Full Member
 

some of the most gorgeous paintings in Floreza

Where the f*** is that??


 
Posted : 20/09/2009 7:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where the f*** is that??

I wouldn't bother if I were you.

I've been to Floreza .............. it was shite.


 
Posted : 20/09/2009 1:02 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

Jontawn, check out the exhibitors section of this page - http://www.npg.org.uk/bp-portrait-award-20091/the-exhibition.php


 
Posted : 20/09/2009 1:24 pm