[Closed] The Orient - Racist?

We had this discussion in a hot tub of all places in Cuba many many years ago, with Chinese, Canadian, German, British and no US present.

The Canadians considered it offensive, everyone else were too drunk to comment 😉

Can't wait to see Leyton Orient rebranded.

I just find it totally bizarre and wondered if there was in fact a genuinely understandable reason.

'Oriental' is considered racist because both terms are western.

How can it be western when the word oriental means eastern?

Oriental means eastern, so I suppose that's a bit eurocentric, no? Haven't heard anyone use the word in that sense for years though, last time i heard it used was by my grandad.

Where does the conclusion that you can't call other asians, asians come from? Turkey is transcontinental so calling all turks asians would be weird. Cyprus is meditteranean rather than asian surely?

BigJohn - Member

How can it be western when the word oriental means eastern?

Seriously? It's latin- and obviously if you're calling something eastern, it's because you're to the west!

Call the Canadians Occidents

That'll learn em

Call the Canadians Occidents

That'll learn em

call them Americans..it's even funnier 😀

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=oriental

Haven't heard anyone use the word in that sense for years though, last time i heard it used was by my grandad.

It was considered very polite, as in oriental [i]gentleman[/i].

Interestingly, I guess it would be appropriate for the Chinese or Japanese to refer to the Yanks as "Orientals". Perhaps they should.

🙄

😮

Can't wait to see Leyton Orient rebranded

It ain't happening, haven't we got enough agro with all the Olympic Stadum business.

We have already changed from Clapton Orient, leave the O's alone

Cyprus is meditteranean rather than asian surely?

There is no continent call Meditterane. 😉

And don't called me Shirley.

TuckerUK - Member

There is no continent call Meditterane.

There's also no continent called Asia.

I thought it was only offensive when used as the acronym for westernised oriental gentleman

Which is a fake backronym anyway.

Oriental isn't racist in itself, it's just obsolete and (apparently) unwelcome. Quick test: would the Major in Fawlty Towers use it? If so, avoid!

Edward Said wrote a very influential book called Orientalism (short version: westerners always project all sorts of romantic or condescending bollocks onto people from "the East") which also hastened the demise of the term.

Eur[b]asia[/b] maybe?

I think it may be offensive or racist as it is a simplification and somewhat reductive.
Oriental means little more than Eastern, so should include all kinds of people.yet is only really applied to a subset of them. We have a similar issue where folks use the term Asian when they only mean a subset of people from Asia. It feels racist because it reduces Asian to meaning brown skinned but i don't know where from and Oriental means slanty-eyed but i don't know where from.

Encountered this a couple of years ago meeting a friend of an American friend. I described her as oriental...which went down like a jobby sandwich. Not quite as bad as the N word apparently, but not far off

what would Mr Wu from deadwood say about it?

Oh for heaven's sake. Could someone just compile a list of words we are allowed to use and then we can get on with communicating clearly with each other?

To Western Europeans, it's not immediately obvious how to identify racial differences between mid- and far-Eastern peoples. This is compounded not by racism but genetics (cf. "they all look the same to me"); humans are intrinsically bad at differentiating facial features outside their of own creed.

But anyway. If you put, say, a Japanese gentleman in a room together with similar representatives from China, Vietnam, Thailand, N/S Korea, etc, and asked your average Brit to identify the nationalities, they wouldn't be able to do it. Similarly, shibboleths aside, if you were to group a Canadian, an Englishman, a Welshman, a German, would you tell the difference?

So how do we politically correctly describe someone who is of indeterminate nationality but obvious race? "Yeah, there were three lads there officer, a white guy, er, a brown one and a yellow one."

I've always believed "Asian" (Indian / ****stani) and "Oriental" (Chinese / Japanese) to be safe terms. You wouldn't blink at someone suggesting that a vase had obvious "oriental influences" in its design. But now this is offensive? We're running out of adjectives.

I knew the US used 'Asian' to mean what we'd call 'Oriental', I've fallen foul of that before, though I can't remember offhand how they'd refer to someone of from the Indian subcontinent. I'd guess they get grouped in as 'black' with all the hand luggage that comes with that? "Indian" is a whole other minefield in the US of course.

Incidentally, next time you're laid up at an airport, have a game of "guess the nationality." It's fascinating.

Edward Said wrote a book about the way the orient is depicted in western culture. Well worth a look at these videos if you've got the time.

Oh for heaven's sake. Could someone just compile a list of words we are allowed to use and then we can get on with communicating clearly with each other?

I understand your dilemma. I felt exactly the same when I was banned for calling someone a tit.

Our dear friends across the water really do get themselves in a pickle with language at times. I guess there may be an argument that oriental is western-centric, but racist? Really?

It's refreshing to spend time in South/Southern Africa these days where simple language can be used simply - black is black, white is white and coloured is coloured without, or at least with less of, the prejudice that went with those terms in the past. Why does everyone else find it so difficult to use basic adjectives?

And then in Asia, there is no shame to noting racial differences. I will always be a gaijin in Japan. If anyone would like to take offence on my behalf, feel free. I certainly will not.

I understand your dilemma. I felt exactly the same when I was banned for calling someone a tit.

<Speaking as a user here, not a mod, just to be clear; I don't know anything about this ban>

It's refreshing to spend time in South/Southern Africa these days where simple language can be used simply - black is black, white is white and coloured is coloured

But what do they call someone with slantish eyes and skin with a slightly yellowish tinge ?

If you can crack that one it would help.

There's also no continent called Asia.

According to my Chambers's Encyclopaedia there are seven continents: Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Europe, Australia, and Antarctica.

Still, what do they know eh? Shall you tell them or me?

I know some countries worldwide teach only six continents, whilst others teach only five.

Given what's going on in Africa these days, Ernie, I would imagine, "Chinese."

Even if SE Asians find the term Oriental offensive, shouldn't someone tell them? I'm mean, not only is the term used extensively by SE Asian businesses, my local Chinese (run by Chinese people born in China) is called the Oriental Palace. I wonder if they know how damn offensive they are being too themselves. Bloody racists immigrants! 🙄

But what do they call someone with slantish eyes and skin with a slightly yellowish tinge ?

If you can crack that one it would help.

Well, seeing as white people aren't white (well, I've never seen one that is), and black people aren't black (ditto, though close), you call them yellow. On the scale of racism/offence all equal.

And never forget, both racism and offence really need intent.

I would imagine, "Chinese."

Well that's a bit insulting to people who aren't Chinese teamhurtmore.

I would have expected the South Africans to be a tad more sensitive to racism.

Has anybody mentioned political correctness gone mad yet? 😉

Eurasia maybe?

No, that's a landmass.

The Americas are also a landmass, comprising the continents of North America and South America.

But what do they call someone with slantish eyes

Does that depend on whether it's something inherent to their race or something they've acquired by staying too long?

Not really. Chinese are the major Oriental players in Africa, so probably a sensible guess for a S African to make. Of course, they are sensitive to racism but, sensibly IMO, they have no problem calling black people "black" and white people "white". Just leaves us foreigners fannying around for more convoluted vocab when they have no issue with it.

.....they have no problem calling black people "black" and white people "white"

I don't either. Do you know many people who have a problem with that ? I don't think I know any.

TuckerUK - Member

According to my Chambers's Encyclopaedia there are seven continents: Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Europe, Australia, and Antarctica.

Still, what do they know eh? Shall you tell them or me?

Cobblers though isn't it- the origin of the 7-continent model is just low quality ancient geography, geographically and geologically Eurasia is a single continent.

This is the trouble I don't think many words are racist in themselves ,But racism is the intent behind the word.

Cobblers though isn't it- the origin of the 7-continent model is just low quality ancient geography, geographically and geologically Eurasia is a single continent.

Not really. The land mass Eurasia is split into two distinct continents separated by a mountain range (the Urals), because the indigenous peoples were so different on either side. Ditto North and South America.

Ditto North and South America.

What mountain range separates North and South America ?

And are the indigenous peoples really so different on either side ?

China, Vietnam, Thailand, N/S Korea,

If you can't recognize the difference between a Chinese person and a Thai you've got something seriously wrong with your brains facial recognition circuits. 😛

They are completely different looks....Thai's and Filipino's have a much more pacific islander look going on....I could forgive mixing up Han Chinese and Japanese but Thai and Chinese is easy peazie

That cherry-picked sentence in full,

But anyway. If you put, say, a Japanese gentleman in a room together with similar representatives from China, Vietnam, Thailand, N/S Korea, etc, and asked your average Brit to identify the nationalities, they wouldn't be able to do it. Similarly, shibboleths aside, if you were to group a Canadian, an Englishman, a Welshman, a German, would you tell the difference?

Are you saying I'm wrong? That your [i]average [/i]Brit can recognise the identity of a Thai bloke just by looking at his face?

I'm saying if you put them next to each other and asked them which one was Chinese and which one was Thai, anyone who was remotely educated in regards to GCSE Geography or who has met someone who is Thai and/or Chinese then yes I would expect them to guess correctly at a statistically significant level.

But seeing as your average Brit is a nationalistic narrow minded buffoon with an interest in the outside world that is almost comparable to Americans then I'm perhaps inclined to agree that you are right.

The Welsh, the English and the Canadians have mingled to much to tell them apart...islands have a pretty good way of cutting populations off so that they produce quite distinctive facial features. Thais are predominantly of Austronesian descent and look a hell of a lot different to Koreans, Chinese and the Japanese.

I get told I look German by my girlfriends parents...and I've been mistaken for being Dutch by Germans...until I spoke...so it would seem Asians can also take an educated guess as to where you may be from. Thy can certainly tell the difference between Southern and Northern Europeans which is akin to the Thai/Filipino/Indonesia vs China/Korea/Japan divide.

Ditto North and South America.

What mountain range separates North and South America ?

No mountains, but the 'Mericans dug a little ditch called the [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal ]Panama Canal[/url] a few years ago...

Panama is in central america.

And George bush referred to nelson mandelaa
s african american

I've always believed "Asian" (Indian / ****stani) and "Oriental" (Chinese /Japanese) to be safe terms. You wouldn't blink at someone suggesting that a vase had obvious "oriental influences" in its design. But now this is offensive? We're running out of adjectives

On the contrary, we have plenty of adjectives, we should use them rather then reductively using only two. Even if it were tru that the average Brit could not distinguish between Thai and Chinese this is a culpapble ignorance. If you cannot tell the difference between Indian and ****stani, then take the time to find out what distinguishes these people from others and unites them or is at least more specific.if the specificity is not important, then you might need to inspect why you are using a racial adjective at all. South Asian,, east Asian, south east Asian are all better.

But seeing as your average Brit is a nationalistic narrow minded buffoon with an interest in the outside world that is almost comparable to Americans then I'm perhaps inclined to agree that you are right.

So you are saying this about British people, would you say the same about any other nation ? Norwegians perhaps ? you do realise by saying your average Brit, that this must now include all people of all origins, colours and sexual orientation or are you just referring to your own prejudiced view of what you consider the average Brit to be.

Some people may consider this to be racist

Words themselves are not racist. It's the intent and context behind them.

if you were to group a Canadian, an Englishman, a Welshman, a German, would you tell the difference?

Of course you could, the Welshman would be spectacularly handsome, witty, generous and with a panting supermodel on each arm 😉

Words themselves are not racist. It's the intent and context behind them.

Of course words are not racist, though they can be loaded with racist overtones, or carry some linguistic baggage. In this case racist seems to be the wrong term, it is perhaps being used as a short cut for racially insensitive or ignorant. There is no malice behind waht is being said, however there are clearly some cases where little ffort is made to find out about our compatriots.

Try this, if you cannot tell the difference between Indian or ****stani, then say 'either Indian or ****stani' though i struggle to thiink of a phrase where such a description is useful.

@pigface, those aren't supermodels, they are policemen, you're just too drunk to see properly

As above, the term is context sensitive, it may be heard as racist to Septics, but isn't here.

But to pick an argument:

If you can't recognize the difference between a Chinese person and a Thai you've got something seriously wrong with your brains facial recognition circuits

that's absolute tosh. A northern Thai from Chiang Rai will be much closer physically to a Chinese from Yunnan (say), than the Yunnanese from someone from Beijing. Have a look at the map. China is the size of old W Europe, with all the internal diversity that involves. Oriental covers it fine.

What you're saying there, Moses is that the statement "If you can't recognize the difference between a Chinese person and a Thai you've got something seriously wrong with your brains facial recognition circuits" is itself racist, as it's assuming a uniformity which doesn't exist? 😆

my local Chinese (run by Chinese people born in China) is called the Oriental Palace.

You wouldn't blink at someone suggesting that a vase had obvious "oriental influences" in its design

Apparently this is okay as (according to some commentators) "oriental" can be used to describe an object but not a person.
(See also: "Scotch")

Personally I had no idea anyone considered "oriental" to be offensive.

The trouble is that the "offence" is often derived from local social baggage and loaded meanings.

If someone from a country which understands that context uses the word then they are probably being a bit racist, but if someone from a country outside of that context uses it innocently then there is honestly no real harm done.

Such is the difficulty of worldwide non-verbal communication.

I went to South African a couple of years ago and was working alongside a local of Sri Lankan origin. He used the word "coloured" to describe fellow countrymen without any seeming racist overtone or intent. If I as a white person used that term in parts of London I'd have to put my sprinting shoes on first! Language use and localised inferences are a funny thing.

I wonder if "oriental" has colonial overtones to some, hence the racist connotations?

And are the indigenous peoples really so different on either side ?

I think your question should have been 'Were the indigenous peoples really so different on either side when the terms were coined?'

To which my answer would be I've no idea. Have you?

Can I just point out that trying to determine someones nationality by looking at them is pretty pointless. Children get their nationality from their parents, irrespective of where they are born. But those children can have their nationality changed before themselves having children. So, a 100% (e.g.) Chinese looking person might actually be Japanese.

You can probably determine their race, but then you'd better not say it for fear of being branded a racists. Unless they are Caucasian, that one's fine still.

Yes Tucker you are right - as someone else pointed out ethnic lines blur as well - eg yunnan and Northern Thailand.....

.....what I was trying to get at is the idea that all Asians look the same.....they don't. I've grown tired of the "they all look the same" jokes. You can make educated guesses for fun even if you don't announce them to the world...

I wonder if "oriental" has colonial overtones to some, hence the racist connotations?

Yes that's pretty much it. Some Chinese I've met don't like the word because they associate it with the opium wars. Generally I just try to to behave and use language that is acceptable in the company of whoever I'm speaking to, it doesn't take much groundwork to know what does bother different ethnic groups....for example don't call Japanese people Japs to their faces. The best thing to do though is just to avoid all racial language as much as possible when speaking to people from different backgrounds.

Just basic courtesy that's all.

orientalism? said? I could so go off on one. but here's this instead...

http://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/china-restaurant-02252013204624.html

You'll also meet people who use pejorative language for white people or foreigners...gaijin being a great one but I like to think the ignorance of others is no excuse to behave the same way yourself.

Secondly my comments about Brits are bourne out of utter frustration from hearing things like "chinky" being used to describe my missus on nights out. It's bad enough your being racist, it's a double insult to mix Chinese and Filipino up.

Unless they are Caucasian, that one's fine still.

That's a typical caucer thing to say.

TuckerUK - Member

Not really. The land mass Eurasia is split into two distinct continents separated by a mountain range (the Urals), because the indigenous peoples were so different on either side.

The Urals don't split europe and asia, though, they only go part of the way. And in any case the divide between the two has wandered around over the years, sometimes along real lines and sometimes along imagined ones. What you describe isn't a continental divide but a cultural divide- which is no less a real thing.

Having lived in Asia (not the Orient 😀 ) for most of my adult life, it always raises a wry smile when I see a lot of handwringing angst from westerners about racist language.

Why, because in my experience the Asians themselves don't see treating people differently purely based on race as being that strange. In fact, I'd have to say that the Chinese in particular are the most racist people I've ever met. Let me qualify that - its not in a loutish ignorant abusive way like a football fan calling a black player names, but in a more pervasive and institutionalised way. Which is actually more worrying. For example, my identity card contained a numerical code of my racial origins, and my citizenship rights were different accordingly, and would never change no matter how long I lived there - I was different to them, and always would be! This is something that would never be tolerated in the west, where we don't even have to answer questions on race in an official census if we don't want to.

But perhaps even more sinister, there is a deep seated cultural belief amongst the Chinese that they are simply superior to the rest of us, and they believe it is only a matter of time that this is universally recognised. Now, ignorant name calling I can brush off, but a latent superiority complex is scary, especially considering that China is entirely likely to be the next world superpower.

By the way, they're not above ignorant name calling either - in Hong Kong westerners are casually referred to as Gweilo, which roughly translates as foreign devil ghost, and my Chinese secretary used to cheerily greet me each morning at work by calling me a round eyed pig, which is the Chinese equivalent of us calling them slitty eyed - Prince Philip would have been in his element!

At least most of this was done in good humour though, whilst they reserved their worst verbal insults and outright prejudiced behaviour for south Asians and Africans - and that's what has got a lot of them worried about the rise of Chinese economic power and nationalism.

Anyway, before I get too carried away on my soapbox, the purpose of all this is not to justify racism, but just that I wouldn't get too upset whether you call someone Asian or Oriental, because they'll be sure to be calling you something much worse under their breath 😕

If you are Chinese then you are Chinese regardless of where you are. You consider yourself Chinese first then the nationality second.

Categories of Chinese:
1. Chinese Chinese (From father or mother land China),
2. Oversea Chinese (anyone born or live outside of China or the descendant of Chinese outside of China)
3. Chinese enemy vice versa (China/PRC vs Taiwan/ROC)

Chinese may not like other Chinese but they tend to look down on other races because they lack Confucius teaching i.e. respect and know your place in an orderly society.

Yes, you can label the Chinese however you want but bear in mind it can be a national pastime for them to label you too. Worst still they are natural at doing so. 🙂

If you cannot tell the difference between Indian and ****stani, then take the time to find out what distinguishes these people from others

But perhaps even more sinister, there is a deep seated cultural belief amongst the Chinese that they are simply superior to the rest of us, and they believe it is only a matter of time that this is universally recognised. Now, ignorant name calling I can brush off, but a latent superiority complex is scary, especially considering that China is entirely likely to be the next world superpower.

The first part is pretty much common to every country I've lived in - US Americans think they're the best, so do the British*, the Spanish, Egyptians... Scary bit is the future superpower aspect.

* in the case of the English they are, of course, right.

If you are Chinese then you are Chinese regardless of where you are. You consider yourself Chinese first then the nationality second.

Categories of Chinese:
1. Chinese Chinese (From father or mother land China),
2. Oversea Chinese (anyone born or live outside of China or the descendant of Chinese outside of China)
3. Chinese enemy vice versa (China/PRC vs Taiwan/ROC)

Chinese may not like other Chinese but they tend to look down on other races because they lack Confucius teaching i.e. respect and know your place in an orderly society.

chewkw, I'd be interested to hear your views on something I witnessed many times in Asia. Chinese in your category 1. above ie native born, seemed to feel a strong resentment towards those in category 2 ie overseas born Chinese.

This was particularly obvious when a naive western company would transfer an arrogant young Chinese-American MBA graduate to their mainland Chinese office in the belief that as he looked Chinese he'd know how to get on with 'them'. The mainland Chinese would without fail turn on this poor guy and make his life hell, much more so than the western staff, who they grudgingly accepted.

I've always put this down to jealousy, or feelings that a 'banana' as they called them (yellow on the outside but white on the inside) is somehow a traitor to their race. But I'd be interested to hear your take on it?

There is also a strong belief within china tied into their national identity, that they are infact descended from homo erectus and therefore a different type of human!, most paleontologists dispute this

The first part is pretty much common to every country I've lived in - US Americans think they're the best, so do the British*, the Spanish, Egyptians...

😆 Yes, of course Mogrim, they do...

However, with what I now know about Chinese culture and history (which I have to admit is still barely scratching the surface) I'd have to grudgingly admit that the Chinese are probably the ones who are right 😯

US Americans think they're the best, so do the British*,

Agree on Americans, not on British or English. The people I know all look up to Oriental cultures, generally rate them with higher average IQs too. I think of them as the latest Mk of homo sapiens.

Yes, of course Mogrim, they do...

Yup. And I'd say the majority of people from a given country will also believe their food and weather are the best, too.

Agree on Americans, not on British or English

You might not, but when the best selling papers in the UK are the Mail and the Sun, I'm willing to bet that the majority think differently. Sure, most people are willing to admit that a certain detail is better elsewhere, but overall?

The people I know all look up to Oriental cultures, generally rate them with higher average IQs too. I think of them as the latest Mk of homo sapiens.

Really? 😯

Yes, of course Mogrim, they do...

Yup. And I'd say the majority of people from a given country will also believe their food and weather are the best, too.

Sorry mogrim, I was actually genuinely agreeing with you, not being sarcastic, though I see how it may have looked otherwise...

Really?

Oh yes, the IQ part is a widely held belief amongst the scientific community too.

perthmtb - Member

chewkw, I'd be interested to hear your views on something I witnessed many times in Asia. Chinese in your category 1. above ie native born, seemed to feel a strong resentment towards those in category 2 ie overseas born Chinese.

This was particularly obvious when a naive western company would transfer an arrogant young Chinese-American MBA graduate to their mainland Chinese office in the belief that as he looked Chinese he'd know how to get on with 'them'. The mainland Chinese would without fail turn on this poor guy and make his life hell, much more so than the western staff, who they grudgingly accepted.

I've always put this down to jealousy, or feelings that a 'banana' as they called them (yellow on the outside but white on the inside) is somehow a traitor to their race. But I'd be interested to hear your take on it?

A delicate balance I see ...

LOL! That would be a disaster when a young MBA try to rule the Confucius minded masses with his Harvard business knowledge.

Better just send a Gweilo to do the job as at least they might just forgive you for being a barbaric foreigner and bow to your barbaric force. Mind you they will still sabotage you or work to rule and definitely call you names behind your back - a must.

Yes, they don't like the young banana MBA for various reasons:

1. They want to treat him as equal but treating him as equal means young MBA needs to know his place. i.e. no young MBA banana must rule over older/experienced bureaucrats unless back up by fair barbaric force.

2. They want him to be on their sides i.e. he is Chinese, looks Chinese, may or may not speak proper Chinese ... not that important but until they know where he stands they see him as a traitor. In this case it very obvious that he is a traitor representing foreign company and still think that he is there to spy on them.

3. Confucius teaching. Respect the elders and never send a young man to rule over the "bureaucrats". It's a bit like the old dynasty where a young chap needs climb his way up accordingly with support from various dodgy players in the hierarchical order.

4. Jealousy ... Young MBA lives high life and they want that too. Hang on ... they are slaves so resent young MBA.

The solutions (choose one or combination) ... again a very delicate balance as you are dealing with far superior civilisation ...

1. Mongol style - [b]fair[/b] but barbaric. Not the JapLand style because they were unfair and barbaric (they loved sex and thought they were superior). Victorian style - no good because they were treated as slaves.

2. Modern western style - you need to adjust your management style to incorporate Chinese Confucius/bureaucrat thinking. If you show too much respect (too lenient) for them your are doomed. If you are too hard on them when they do not understand the rationale behind it then you're doomed.

3. Young MBA might need a Chinese bureaucrat mentor but then that comes with another can of worm ... puppet etc.

For me I prefer the Mongol style ... fair but barbaric.

Oh yes, the IQ part is a widely held belief amongst the scientific community too.

Average IQ differences between countries have nothing to do with genetics or the fact that certain oriental ethnic backgrounds are Humans 2.0.

It has everything to do with diet and environmental conditions. Infectious disease rates are actually the best predictor of intelligence.

Chewkw...you quite simply have some of the most weird thought patterns and idea's I've ever come across. Your incoherent ramblings about things like "JapLand" and "maggots" make you sound as though you have a massive dose of ignorance/racism backed up with an unhealthy dose of formal thought disorder.

Bwaarp, having lived in China for twenty years, everything chewkw says makes sense. It is a very different culture, and if you don't understand it, don't make the arrogant 19th century westerners mistake of just bad mouthing it!

Thanks for your response chewkw, that goes a long way to explaining why I was never a successful barbarian overlord in my time in China - even the most mundane office politics is more complex than the Machiavellian conniving of an episode of Yes Minister! I wish I'd taken your wise counsel twenty years ago.

Instead, I took the Samurai way out... (and yes, I know the Chinese consider the Japanese a bunch of jumped up fishermen and rice farmers 😀 )

bwaarp - Member

Your incoherent ramblings about things like "JapLand" and "maggots" make you sound as though you have a massive dose of ignorance/racism backed up with an unhealthy dose of formal thought disorder.

In that case I should tell my Japanese friend to stop referring to himself "We the Japs ..." I learned the term from him and not the Brit (he used that term too).

Maggot is a fair term for mankind as that is what we are, maggot. The term is also acceptable because we are all in it. No bias, no prejudice, no discrimination, no sexual bias etc.

Why do you think you can come up with a better term?

I think you use the term "maggots" as a way to dehumanize others and place yourself on a pedestal.

Generally when I'm taking the piss out of human kind it's because I'm suffering from a massive sense of disappointment with the intellectual ability of my peers, with you I sense something different entirely.

Chewkw...you quite simply have some of the most weird thought patterns and idea's I've ever come across. Your incoherent ramblings about things like "JapLand" and "maggots" make you sound as though you have a massive dose of ignorance/racism backed up with an unhealthy dose of formal thought disorder.

😐 I like Chewkw's ramblings.