Forum menu
Sir! Keir! Starmer!
 

Sir! Keir! Starmer!

Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

Of course everything is built on what went before - but socialism was defined by Marx and Engels


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 4:12 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13392
Full Member
 

I need some reading material. Ill have a look at those authors you mention

While you're at it look up Murray Bookchin.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 4:17 pm
Posts: 8021
Full Member
 

but socialism was defined by Marx and Engels

If you are using their definition of socialism because they were "first" (lets leave aside the question around that) then shouldnt you be using John Locke's definition of liberalism.

Which very definitively isnt the one you have been using so far.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 4:43 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

Of course everything is built on what went before – but socialism was defined by Marx and Engels

They gave a definition but they certainly weren't the first.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 5:24 pm
Posts: 5689
Free Member
 

Wasn't the 'first' (I mean how do you say who was the actual first!) a French guy, surname begining with L? His name escapes me.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 5:37 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

Wasn’t the ‘first’ (I mean how do you say who was the actual first!) a French guy, surname begining with L? His name escapes me.

I would argue there was no "first" as there are competing views on what it means. As far as I'm aware, Saint-Simon was the first to use the word and describe it. But there were numerous French philosophers of that time, as well as Robert Owen who could be considered socialists.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 5:49 pm
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

I’m not going to start arguing online with you, but suffice to say, the notion of socialism has evolved a bit since Engels and Marx!

Exactly.  Things change/evolve and form into different approaches (social democracy) but are still inherently socialist in their nature with the same desired outcomes for society.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 6:11 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

FFS - social democracy and socialism are very different things

socialism requires full state or community ownership of the means of production and a command economy.

Social democracy is state control of key assets and a managed mixed economy

Social democracy and socialism have very different aims as well.

Just accept you are not socialists but social democrats


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 6:22 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 24857
Free Member
 

Ernie is the only real leftie on here.

On here? How can you possibly think that? Maybe the only really visible one, in this thread, right now.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 6:25 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

OK - the only public lefty on here as in someone who actually believes in socialism


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 6:29 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

FFS – social democracy and socialism are very different things

Market socialism? Utopian? Scientific? Communism?

I agree that social democracy is different to those, but they are all different to each other.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 6:31 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

Market socialism is an oxymoron ( I think thats the term - when two opposing words appear together).  If there is a market there is not socialism, in socialism there is no market.  I guess its another way of saying social democracy

communism is not the same as socialism. Thats very basic stuff


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 6:57 pm
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

I am going to say I don't really care that much about pure definitions and am more interested in the form/variant of socialism that I think can work in 2024 so will leave you to your 'debate'


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:09 pm
Posts: 648
Free Member
 

@tjagain

How many dark greens are flying around the globe? 😈


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:10 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

in the form/variant of socialism that I think can work in 2024

Are you in favour of full state control of the means of production and a command economy?  You need both those things for socialism

What you seem to want is social democracy.  A fine aim.  Thats where you have a mixed economy, a full welfare state and redistibutive taxation.  Its not a form of socialism however.  Its a a different political philosophy

Like the Scandi countries or Germany or indeed much of europe


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:37 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

Nobody is perfect bikepawl - not even me. 🙂  Porritt was once asked in a TV interview what his biggest environmental crime was.  he replied flying to here for this interview 🙂


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:38 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

communism is not the same as socialism. Thats very basic stuff

Your problem there is that Marx used the terms interchangeably. Are you still prepared to reduce socialism to a Marxist definition?

Market socialism is an oxymoron 

Yeah, no. A cooperative operating in a market economy, for example.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:43 pm
Posts: 31091
Full Member
 

There is no purely socialist state in the world. Not even China.

There is no pure unfettered market economy in the world. Not even the USA.

These ideas are in practise together, in all countries. We’re all living in mixed economies, and the arguments and political “battle” is all about what that mix is, and how much is state owned, or controlled, or regulated.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:48 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

Your problem there is that Marx used the terms interchangeably.

No - he was very clear on the difference from my reading.  Communism is the end point, socialism is a step on the way.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:48 pm
Posts: 8021
Full Member
 

Are you in favour of full state control of the means of production and a command economy? You need both those things for socialism

No, you dont. You are simpifying socialism down to a single version and/or reading a lot into something Marx left rather vague. The problem with your approach is social ownership doesnt simply mean state ownership.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:53 pm
Posts: 648
Free Member
 

@tjagain

you could argue that there is a difference between flying for work and flying for pleasure.
However if you’re going to call yourself a dark green then flying for pleasure does seem to be hypocritical


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:54 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

correct - as above it could be community ownership

Socialism is clearly state or community owned means of product5ion and a command economy - what you guys keep on describing is social democracy - a different beast

Nowt5 wrong with social democracy but it is not socialism


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 7:56 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

No – he was very clear on the difference from my reading.  Communism is the end point, socialism is a step on the way.

I'm pretty sure it was Lenin who popularised that view.

Communism is socialist but not all socialism is communist.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 8:06 pm
Posts: 8021
Full Member
 

Socialism is clearly state or community owned means of product5ion and a command economy

It really isnt unless you are the sort of yank you uses "liberal" as an insult.

Now you could argue about the relative usefulness of the various definitions and at which point they blur into something else but honestly I leave that to the fanatics. So enjoy.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 8:28 pm
Posts: 1972
Full Member
 

I’m going to guess TJ has never seen Life of Brian…


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 9:27 pm
stumpyjon, binners, binners and 1 people reacted
 DrJ
Posts: 14007
Full Member
 

I’m amazed to see that Starmer fully supports Sunak’s rambling waffle about extremism. I’m sure nobody saw that coming !!


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 10:18 pm
Posts: 11646
Full Member
 

Such a shock, given the lack of authoritarianism in the way Starmer has governed the Labour Party up to now it’s an absolute head scratcher. Lots of good comments on Twitter from various political pundits but they all mention the thing that shall not be mentioned so won’t post them, but they’re there if you know where to look, nudge-nudge…wink-wink.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 10:25 pm
Posts: 33201
Full Member
 

Ah, we're back to the "you're not worthy to call yourself socialists" anti-elitism.

I'm out.


 
Posted : 01/03/2024 10:51 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

More cash - not my point at all.  My point is that folk are calling themselves socialists while repudiating any actual socialism ( state control of the means of production, command economy).  There is no shame in being a social democrat.  Its what has made the scandi countries such nice places to live

its like driving where everyone thinks they are above average.  folk that lean leftish think themselves more lefty than they are and on here that trait is more pronounced than I have seen in other places.  I only claim to be leftish.  More interested in Green issues


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 1:29 am
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

I am leftish, your definitions put me as social democrat (yes a form/variant of socialism) that is more leftish than anything else although I haven't seen your definitions for left, leftish and so on but don't bother posting them, please.

I don't care how you want to box me and given a choice from scratch I would choose a socialist state.  We don't however have that opportunity for many reasons which is why I would go for an approach that could actually a)have a chance of working within the 2024 constraints and b) get voted for.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 7:50 am
Posts: 33201
Full Member
 

We don’t however have that opportunity for many reasons which is why I would go for an approach that could actually a)have a chance of working within the 2024 constraints and b) get voted for.

Pragmatic Socialists Party.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 8:29 am
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

social democracy is not a form of socialism.  ~This is really basic stuff.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 8:37 am
ernielynch, kelvin, kelvin and 1 people reacted
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

More cash – not my point at all.  My point is that folk are calling themselves socialists while repudiating any actual socialism ( state control of the means of production, command economy).

I'm not sure why you dogmatically continue to reduce socialism to a Marxist definition.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 9:09 am
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

Because that is what socialism is.  Social democracy and socialism are not the same thing at all


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 10:01 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Never mind all that, we just need to know whether he's sub 20 for 10K.

https://twitter.com/Andy66cb/status/1762577569050714325


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 10:27 am
Posts: 6905
Full Member
 

Geez and we thought the conservatives had cornered the market on infighting and navel gazing. This really is Monty Pythonesque.

And back on topic is it any wonder Starmer purged the left of the party.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 10:30 am
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

Postwar and pre-thatcher the Tory Party was a social democratic party. For example Harold Macmillan strongly supported a mixed economy and universal welfare state. Harold MacMillan was never a socialist.

Scandinavian countries have never been described as socialist countries, social democratic countries maybe.

I remember Tony Blair in his early years trying to pretend that social democracy was socialism. He stopped doing that when social democracy sounded too radical for his agenda.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 10:30 am
tjagain, MoreCashThanDash, tjagain and 1 people reacted
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

Because that is what socialism is.

It's what Marx said it is. Which, demonstrably, is not the same thing.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 10:40 am
Posts: 33201
Full Member
 

It’s what Marx said it is. Which, demonstrably, is not the same thing.

And by extension, if that really was socialism, we wouldn't have ended up with the terms Marxism and Communism.

And looking at the Scandinavian countries, I'm quite happy to be criticised for being a social democrat.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 10:46 am
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

I’m quite happy to be criticised for being a social democrat.

I think that was precisely the point that TJ was making.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 11:02 am
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

I wasn't criticising anyone for being a social democrat and i pointed out the scandi countries.  I just find folk on here calling themselves socialist while stating their opposition to anything socialist amusing

Its like saying you are an mtber but will only ride with skinny tyres and drop bars

Communism and socialism are differnt things.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 11:03 am
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

we wouldn’t have ended up with the terms Marxism and Communism.

"Marxism" describes Karl Marx's critique of capitalism as much as anything else. And Lenin sometimes referred to socialism as first phase communism, although he certainly never called the USSR communist.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 11:07 am
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

Communism and socialism are differnt things.

Not according to Marx. We've done this already, go and look it up.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 11:25 am
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

I have and he did differentiate

Socialism is a step on the way to communism according to Marx


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 11:28 am
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

The "withering away of the state" doesn't sound much like socialism to me.


 
Posted : 02/03/2024 11:30 am
Page 471 / 500