Richest 'Briti...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Richest 'British' sportsperson...

277 Posts
53 Users
0 Reactions
495 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Aunty Beeb tells me that Lewis Hamilton is now the richest sportsperson blah blah ... But, importantly it also tells me he lives as a tax exile in Monaco.

In my opinion, he's forfeited his right to be called British by being a tax exile and is more of a toolbox than I had already thought.

Why does someone like him choose not to pay into the system he was brought up in when he can clearly afford it. My moral compass would not allow me to do this, I would want to give something back.

What are the collective thoughts? Am I naive/stupid or missing info on his philanthropic sidelines or is he just greedy?!


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 8:58 am
 iolo
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

Yawn.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

See also Jensen Button.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The system is corrupt, I'm more p*ssed of with the big corporations that pay no tax yet continue to trade and make millions here.

I'd get after those first.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:14 am
Posts: 13227
Full Member
 

The one area where we should be more like America. If you want the passport you pay UK taxes wherever you choose to live in the world.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:14 am
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

My moral compass...

I don't trust my moral compass. And I've seen plenty of compasses go awry when large quantities of money are involved. See eg house buying, car selling/buying for what arseholes people become when greed is waving a magnet near the needle. So yeah, morally, he's on dodgy ground, but I try not to point the finger at individuals - corporations are easier targets as they cannot simply up sticks and move as easily as an individual.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If I had Lewis' fortune and yoghurt-hungry Missus, I think I'd probably live in Monte Carlo too. 😳


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So what? As long as next time he needs hospital treatment he doesn't get on his G5 and high tails it over to the UK to use the NHS, why should he pay into it? He's not benefitting from any of the services of the UK so why should he pay into them?

Anyway, what about the tax benefit and income from the army of people that are part of his enterage? His UK based employees. His management team, mechanics, manufacturers of large gold necklace's, the UK based F1 Mercedes team and mirriad of UK based suppliers and manufacturers that are thriving due to his success? I'm sure the UK is benefitting very nicely from 'Lewis Hamilton Incorporated'. As the currently in vogue political saying goes: You're playing the man, not the ball - or something like that.

This is the problem with this left wing brand of spiteful, jealous politics. It focusses on screwing the individual, bringing them down, rather than what is really important - maximising the total tax take. Success breeds success and many people and companies surrounding successful individuals benefit from their success, as does the UK tax take. And now you're talking about taxing his nationality? taking his passport off him if he doesn't pay into our system? You talk about a moral compass, but I think yours has a dirty great big magnet stuck on the side of it.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:20 am
Posts: 4693
Full Member
 

I'd guess he paid a fair amount of tax before he moved abroad. And anyway, it's easy saying 'I wouldn't do that' but unless you're in the same position you don't really know.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmmm. I actually lean centre right politically Wobbliscot. My point is simply that he is living in tax exile so is avoiding tax deliberately, if you think that's fine then walk on.

As for the Team Hamilton rant, that's just sh!te. Amazon, Starbucks, et alhave loads of folk working for them paying income tax so does that make it acceptable to avoid their tax as a company, eh, no!

Who mentioned his passport anyway?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Meh he lives in Monaco which could be thought of as the home of his "sport".


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:37 am
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

...left wing brand of spiteful, jealous politics.

It's only the morning but we probably have Laziest Phrase Of The Day already.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:38 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

FWIW I agree with the OP. He's not British in my eyes. If he wasnt an F1 driver some other person would drive for Mclaren and generate as much tax for the country as Mclaren is British team so your view seems flawed Wobbly.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anybody on here ever [s]avoided[/s] evaded paying import duty? That appears to be an acceptable form of tax [s]avoidance[/s] evasion around here.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:42 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

guess he paid a fair amount of tax before he moved abroad. And anyway, it's easy saying 'I wouldn't do that' but unless you're in the same position you don't really know.

This is tru. But I reckon when I got to a level that he's on I would just think. **** it it makes no difference and pay my tax. Even if I did live by a nice beach in the med!


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

a_a has the first fail for clearly not actually knowing much about the subject being discussed 😆


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:43 am
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Why should the country that he lives in determine his nationality?
I don't consider myself British, and I doubt that many others would think so, but I've lived half my life here.
If he lived in Ireland, or Spain, would you be writing this?

Or is the real issue that the country he lives in happens to have a low tax regime?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:49 am
Posts: 13227
Full Member
 

Who mentioned his passport anyway?

That would be me.

The country seems to bend over backwards to accommodate the richer inhabitants of the planet for not much tangible benefit to the collective good (not financal good because enslavement to the bottom line creates all sorts of behavioural anomalies which do not benefit the whole just the individual).

If that makes me jealous in some people eyes so be it. If a little more effort was put into ensuring everyone had a fair shake of the money tree though enlightened self-interest the country just might have fewer social and economic ills to cope with.

Also after amassing your first personal billion what possible purpose does more money on top of that serve? It becomes meaningless and just a number. There comes a point where being able to exhaust all that personal money on living costs or toys becomes impossible.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:54 am
Posts: 13800
Full Member
 

Looking at it another way - he's just one employee of a company that employs hundreds (if not thousands) of people in the UK who pay their personal and company taxes.

Can't say I have a huge problem with him living in Monoco, and no doubt a lot of his millions get spent in the UK by himself and indirectly by his family.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:55 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

a_a has the first fail for clearly not actually knowing much about the subject being discussed

What have I missed then oh wise one?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Which team does he drive for?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 9:59 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Oh right. I was thinking the other day when I strayed onto the grand prix on the telly that I didnt know who half the teams were anymore. Ferrari are easy to spot! His team are still british based though isnt it?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 10:17 am
Posts: 24368
Full Member
 

I'd be living somewhere sunny and nice if I could afford it, & saving tax would be a bonus. I don't blame him


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 10:28 am
Posts: 13800
Full Member
 

His team are still british based though isnt it?

Yes - only Ferrari, Sauber and Toro Rosso are based abroad.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 10:52 am
Posts: 2661
Free Member
 

Why does someone like him choose not to pay into the system he was brought up in when he can clearly afford it.

I would think that he is acting upon finacial advice from someone with knowledge and experience of the best way for Him to retain as much of his cash as possible, I doubt he pursued the career that he has done in order to maximise his contribution to the UK tax system.

Do you relly believe you would do things differently ? and if you did do you think it would be appreciated ?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:05 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Do you relly believe you would do things differently ? and if you did do you think it would be appreciated ?

The op is not talking about it being appreciated or not he's talking about morals. I dont think its morally right to avoid paying tax.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got an ISA? a pension? childcare vouchers? a bike on bike to work scheme (which you don't ride to work)? buy duty free booze?

Plenty of people on here you're presumably also condemning.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:20 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Is an ISA tax avoidance? Odd definition if it is.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course it is. That's the whole point.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry but I think that if we all had as much cash as Mr Hamilton then the majority of us would do the same thing. I would for sure. Plus Monaco is a pretty nice place to live if you have a lot of cash - casinos and restaurants, weather, beaches, mountains, F1 history + connections etc, etc.

There seems to be a tendancy to bash people who've done well for themselves in the UK at the moment. Unlike various celebrities who seem to be purely famous for being famous, Lewis has worked incredibly hard to get to where he is today. Fair play to him I say.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:34 am
Posts: 2661
Free Member
 

The op is not talking about it being appreciated or not he's talking about morals. I dont think its morally right to avoid paying tax.

I never mentioned morals !

However seeing as you mentioned it.
I personally do not think that it is morally responsible to race around a course in highly developed toy cars burning vast amounts of a finite resource in the pursuance of greed and vanity, so there ..... 😈


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course it is. That's the whole point.

😀

Sorry, why is he not British again? So , in the same logic (?) is a higher rate tax payer more British than a basic rate payer?

Monaco itself is a pretty grim place IMO. Expensive tower blocks, congestion and you are not allowed to wear socks or a simple watch. And all those bloody helicopters!!


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:37 am
 MSP
Posts: 15523
Free Member
 

A whole lot of people have worked hard to make LH a success. He benefits from his teams efforts, their education and health, the system that has provided the infrastructure of support. He has been carried to the top on the shoulders of lots of people, but now he has decided not to pay into the system that has provided him with so much.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:40 am
Posts: 13800
Full Member
 

I personally do not think that it is morally responsible to race around a course in highly developed toy cars burning vast amounts of a finite resource in the pursuance of greed and vanity, so there .....

At least a lot of technical knowledge comes from F1. Which is of huge benefit to many other industries.

What scientific advancement has come from Golf, Tennis or Football!?

He has been carried to the top on the shoulders of lots of people, but now he has decided not to pay into the system that has provided him with so much.

I think missed the Government sponsoring him - I thought it was McLaren who bankrolled his advancement in motorsport.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After SPOTY there was this gem

He should never have won. He is a terrible role model to any Britain. What precedent does that set. Bad day in our history.

Says Joey Barton 😀


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:44 am
Posts: 10400
Full Member
 

Is Monaco part of the EU?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:51 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Of course it is.

I dont think it is. Tax evasion is doing illegal stuff, tax avoidance is looking for gaps in the system and using gov produced tax free systems is organising your finance to minimise tax.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I personally do not think that it is morally responsible to race around a course in highly developed toy cars burning vast amounts of a finite resource in the pursuance of greed and vanity

[img] [/img]

😉


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:54 am
Posts: 2661
Free Member
 

At least a lot of technical knowledge comes from F1. Which is of huge benefit to many other industries.

What scientific advancement has come from Golf, Tennis or Football!?

Totally predictable response ! almost bet myself a tenner it would appear though not as quick 😆

A lot of technical knowledge comes from war as well.

What scientific advancement has come from Golf, Tennis or Football!?

I havent a clue !


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:54 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Tax avoidance is bending the rules of the tax system to gain a tax advantage that Parliament never intended," said a spokesman for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27372841


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ah, so LH is organising his finances to minimise tax?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:56 am
 MSP
Posts: 15523
Free Member
 

I think missed the Government sponsoring him - I thought it was McLaren who bankrolled his advancement in motorsport.

Does mclaren pay for the education of all it's employees, their healthcare from birth to death? Did it pay for the roads that take them from their homes to the factory, does mclaren personally finance the emergency services that protects them?

There are a mirriad of benefits and services that everyone in the UK benefits from, and it seems it isn't always clear to some how tangible many indirect benefits are.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:58 am
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Yep and I'm doing the same paying into an isa.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 11:58 am
Posts: 19449
Free Member
 

ads678 - Member

Is Monaco part of the EU?

The interweb from wiki says yes ...

[b]"Monaco is a part of the EU Customs territory through an agreement with France, and is administered as part of France. San Marino and Andorra are in a customs union with the bloc. Liechtenstein is a member of the EEA so is within the EU internal market and applies certain EU laws"[/b] (Wiki)

Oh ya ... if it ain't illegal then you have no say in this matter coz he has done nothing wrong.

Moral? Can you put a law to that?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:01 pm
Posts: 13800
Full Member
 

Totally predictable response ! almost bet myself a tenner it would appear though not as quick

And yours was a totally predictable F1 is evil, and baby kittens will die if you watch it, post.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does mclaren pay for the education of all it's employees, their healthcare from birth to death? Did it pay for the roads that take them from their homes to the factory, does mclaren personally finance the emergency services that protects them?

To the same extent that any company does for its employees, yes.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Corporation tax?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:06 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

Just waching BBC sport and there is currently an article on about Paula Radcliffe and it's set in Monaco where she lives with her family which I thought was quite apt for the current discussion. Goes to show how much the elite can earn when they make it. Stark contrast to the ones that never quite manage it.

edit: obviously it could also be due to the income from a partner I guess.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:07 pm
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

I just saw that! ****ing Runners. Has run off to pay no tax!


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:09 pm
Posts: 19449
Free Member
 

If you have few bobs you will be at it too!

🙄


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:09 pm
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Bet you £500 I never do.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:11 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

If you have few bobs you will be at it too!

I was wondering this the other day when thinking about licensing some technology.

At what point would yo jump ship? Or at what point would you be getting so much left after tax you wouldnt give a crap as you had plenty anyway?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:11 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15523
Free Member
 

To the same extent that any company does for its employees, yes

Well if corporations paid for everything there would be no need for any other taxes, but they don't.

If you have few bobs you will be at it too!

I would probably move to the Maritime alps in France, so I would actually end up paying more tax, but I put the quality of life ahead of avoiding taxes.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:11 pm
Posts: 19449
Free Member
 

anagallis_arvensis - Member

Bet you £500 I never do.

The question how much do you earn?

In tens of millions?

For those with that money that would equate to a lavish lifestyle that is throw away ...

😯


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:13 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

Oh and for athletes I can fully understand wanting to not live in the UK as far as training is concerned. Nice, warm, dry weather. Then there is some food as well which is often just nicer in better climates.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:14 pm
Posts: 19449
Free Member
 

andyl - Member

Oh and for athletes I can fully understand wanting to not live in the UK as far as training is concerned. Nice, warm, dry weather. Then there is some food as well which is often just nicer in better climates.

Nahhhh ... you are now trying to be "creative" aren't you ... 😆


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:16 pm
Posts: 7270
Free Member
 

Parliament has never intended to tax people who live abroad, except in limited circumstances, so presumably it is not tax avoidance.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:16 pm
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Indeed but Monaco?

The question how much do you earn?
In tens of millions?

No it wasnt, as usual what you actually write and what you think you write are not the same.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:16 pm
Posts: 3403
Free Member
 

Before he moved to Monaco I expect Hamilton paid his tax same as everyone else, and probably more of it too than most people.

When should rich people be allowed to move somewhere else? Who decides when they've paid what they owe the country for bringing them up?

Personally I couldn't care less where he lives. If I became rich enough to move somewhere nicer than the Midlands I wouldn't feel obliged to stay to keep 'putting something back' into the country.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:17 pm
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

Parliament has never intended to tax people who live abroad, except in limited circumstances, so presumably it is not tax avoidance.

You could argue that govs havent intended to have everyone leave when they get rich though...
what he does isnt illegal, its just that many people consider it morally questionable, others dont. C'est la vie


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:19 pm
Posts: 19449
Free Member
 

anagallis_arvensis - Member

Indeed but Monaco?

The question how much do you earn?
In tens of millions?

No it wasnt, as usual what you actually write and what you think you write are not the same.

What I want to say is this you don't earn enough to be a tax exile as you cannot afford to.

But if you earn millions you will have that flexibility and you might take that chance.

Morally right or wrong? Most people are morally wrong anyway IMO ...


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:20 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

but I put the quality of life ahead of avoiding taxes.

^ this

Apart from the tax issue there is a load of other reasons why you would want to live somewhere like Monaco or most of these other 'tax havens'.

It would be very wrong if a government could claw back tax from people living elsewhere.

But how many claim they live elsewhere but spend most of their time in the UK? Or are their safeguards already in place against that?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well if corporations paid for everything there would be no need for any other taxes, but they don't.

Well that's a relief, I wouldn't run a business if it was the other way round!


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Moaning about sports people living in tax havens is missing the point surely. How about having a look at the system that allows people like Philip Green to get away with huge tax avoidance, have companies in his wife's name and make billions of pounds in the Uk, without putting much back in.

Don't hate the player, hate the game son.

Why do you think there are more billionaires in London than any other city? Because of the lovely weather?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:27 pm
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

But if you earn millions you will have that flexibility and you might take that chance.

I wouldnt. Same reason I choose not to earn more teaching in the private sector. I dont think its right.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not right? Sorry so is working as a teacher in the private sector us (morally ) wrong?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:31 pm
Posts: 26759
Full Member
 

In my opinion.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:34 pm
Posts: 8393
Full Member
 

Shirley Lewis Hamilton et al pale a bit when compared to our great powerboating and balloonist hero, Sir Richard Branson? They have a bit of catching up to do.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:41 pm
Posts: 2022
Free Member
 

Is it OK for the UK to take the taxes of the thousands of foreign doctors & nurses working in the NHS?

Shouldn't their respective nations have some 'payback' for training them? Especially the eastern european nations, that need the money more than us?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 12:49 pm
Posts: 40395
Free Member
 

Don't hate the player, hate the game son.

It's OK to have a strong dislike for both, surely?

F1 drivers are terrible for tax avoidance, must be the combination of big money and a calendar that allows them to be based pretty much anywhere.

Footballers would probably be at it loads too if they didn't actually have to go to work in the UK a few times a week.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:11 pm
Posts: 7270
Free Member
 

Footballers would probably be at it loads too if they didn't actually have to go to work in the UK a few times a week.

They are.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:14 pm
Posts: 19449
Free Member
 

anagallis_arvensis - Member
But if you earn millions you will have that flexibility and you might take that chance.
I wouldnt. Same reason I choose not to earn more teaching in the private sector. I dont think its right.

Yes, you have chosen to be a teacher but others has chosen to be tax exiles so what's the problem? You have chosen to work like monkey for peanuts while tax exiles feel the same in where they pay their tax. Yes?


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:18 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

[quote=mefty opined]Parliament has never intended to tax people who live abroad, except in limited circumstances, so presumably it is not tax avoidance.

I think we all know he left and moved to a low tax country to avoid tax

Apart from the tax issue there is a load of other reasons why you would want to live somewhere like Monaco or most of these other 'tax havens'.

When he moved to Switzerland he admitted it was for tax avoidance
Lots of nice places have higher tax if you think he is not there primarily to avoid tax then you are somewhat naive.

He is free to do this and i am free to think he is a **** for doing this.

Much prefer the JK Rowling way


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:19 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The simple fact is that if tax on individuals was lower then the likes of Paula and Lewis would be more minded to stay here - it's a classic case of the uk receiving lower overall tax receipts because of punitive rates of tax on those who are in fact reasonably mobile and can choose where to live. Or shooting ourselves in the foot in everyday parlance.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:22 pm
Posts: 7270
Free Member
 

Tax avoidance is bending the rules of the tax system to gain a tax advantage that Parliament never intended," said a spokesman for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

This was the definition AA chose to quote, according to this definition it isn't, you may wish to define it differently.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:23 pm
Posts: 40395
Free Member
 

it's a classic case of the uk receiving lower overall tax receipts because of punitive rates of tax on those who are in fact reasonably mobile and can choose where to live

I'd be interested to see the stats you have to support this claim.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:23 pm
Posts: 19449
Free Member
 

Imagine this scenario where you earn £10 million a year then out of that £6 million (assuming 60% tax) goes to the tax pot.

Ya, many bling bling gone! In your mind you work hard, assuming you do, for it then someone grabs a big chunk of it away ...

😕


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:25 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15523
Free Member
 

The simple fact is that if tax on individuals was lower then the likes of Paula and Lewis would be more minded to stay here - it's a classic case of the uk receiving lower overall tax receipts because of punitive rates of tax on those who are in fact reasonably mobile and can choose where to live. Or shooting ourselves in the foot in everyday parlance.

They would also be more likely to stay if if there was an international agreement to blacklist tax havens.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:27 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I'd be interested to see the stats you have to support this claim.

I would be interested in any evidence to support any claim they have ever made on this site.
I would not hold your breath if I were you.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:32 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

When he moved to Switzerland he admitted it was for tax avoidance
Lots of nice places have higher tax if you think he is not there primarily to avoid tax then you are somewhat naive.

I'm not talking about LH specifically nor being naive. Just pointing out there are other benefits apart from the lower tax.

If Monaco and Blackpool had the same taxation and I could afford to live in Monaco I know which I would choose.


 
Posted : 25/04/2015 1:36 pm
Page 1 / 4