Forum menu
Most efficient way ...
 

[Closed] Most efficient way to heat house/water? Any experts?

Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#4409052]

Our gas bills were crazy, so during the summer we had the walls and loft insulated, and over the last couple of days we have been having a new boiler installed (with new thermostat & rad controls etc).

Our old 30+ year old boiler was around 55% efficient, so we are hoping to save money in the long run.

Is there a better way to keep house/water warmish? Do I put heating on for an hour here and there, or leave it on low all day?

It's a condensing boiler if that makes any difference.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

is it a combi boiler or normal boiler linked to a vented/unvented hot water tank?


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 

They have taken the hot water tank out of the airing cupboard - so I think that makes it a combi?


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

99p pack of lighters from the 99p shop.

think of all that extra empty space from where they took out the old water tank you'll now have to heat!


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:21 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

They have taken the hot water tank out of the airing cupboard

That will really piss Bear off now ๐Ÿ˜‰

It's a pity they did that.
Anyway, if theyve left you with a combi then all your hot water is created on demand - not stored, then used, so there's not much you can do in that respect.

Assuming you have TRVs fitted to all your radiators, then its a case of sorting out the minimum comfort level you want for each room in the house.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

do what the freehold owner (spelt w a n k e r ) had done in my first flat - connect his electricity supply to my meter ...... luckily I did a test with everything off and started investigating


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:25 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Assuming you have TRVs fitted to all your radiators, then its a case of sorting out the minimum comfort level you want for each room in the house.

Cheers - so just leave on all the time and adjust thermostat/controls accordingly?

It's a pity they did that.

We had three different people round, and they all reckoned it was the best thing to do ๐Ÿ™ I guess it's better to have a tank then?


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends on lots of things. Air tightness, thermal mass, type of house (detached etc) sometimes we heat buildings 24hrs over the heating season because it would take a huge amount of heat to bring back to temp due to thermal mass. Don't do much with residential though sorry.
Try some different things for similar periods and record your gas meter readings. The calcs to convert the readings to kWh are available online. Perhaps do some degree days to normalise the data for more accuracy. There are some good resources for this online also.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers wrecker - monitoring would probably be the best way...I'm pretty half soaked though so will keep forgetting!


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:31 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Cheers - so just leave on all the time and adjust thermostat/controls accordingly?

If I wasnt in the house most of the day, and assuming your house isnt a barn of solid stone then Id say set the CH to come on sometime before you get home and off again at breakfast.

We work from home so have the heating set to 17degrees throughout the day, but a Underfloorheated stone floor works well for that.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:32 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers,

Between us (wife works odd shifts as a nurse, and I work from home a couple of days per week) there is usually someone around. Think I'll start by keeping it on low and monitoring.

Thanks all


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:40 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

BTW - if you log the gas meter reading each day, you can work out how much volume (and hence cost) each day is costing you.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Will do. I bet I can get an app for it!


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:44 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Do you have a spreadsheet that could do that for me ๐Ÿ˜‰

you have a graph of your won as well dont you


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:45 pm
Posts: 20885
Free Member
 

Do you have an electronic thermostat? We have one and the house is much more comfortable for more of the time and the heating bill hasn't gone up.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:48 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Do you have an electronic thermostat?

I think so. I have in front of me a [i]Honeywell CM927 7 day wireless programmable room thermostat with LoT technology. [/i]

Catchy.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry to butt in. We're moving into a solid stone house in a few weeks. Combi boiler, possibly with TRV's, looking at getting a stove fitted too at somepoint in the future. With the thermal mass issue, would we be better off leaving the heating on all day then?


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:53 pm
Posts: 1622
Full Member
 

what about water?

leave it on all the time, or say 2 x 3 hrs / day

do you use more energy reheating it?

(bit of running battle with the wife this one!)


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:54 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

It's a combi? It's on demand.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

bear had a go at me recently for doing the same

we are a couple in a 3bed - with 2 hot water taps and an electric shower

we decided to go combi and rip out all the extra tanks.

it depends on usage as we use that little that heating up a big tank of water all the time isnt great use.

ive got mine set to not let the house drop below 14 but generally it seems only to come on at 4am for an hour and the house is warm for me getitng up at 5.30.

at night i come home and stick the stove on and the boiler doesnt get a chance to fire up.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 12:59 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

interesting one for me this: I've a large detatched house with two bathrooms and a growing family, currently a 20+ year old system boiler and tank

plumbers so far have gone for
1. 1 for 1 replacement of the system boiler, retaining the current tank
2. system boiler with new unvented tank
3. large combi, no tank
4. slightly smaller combi with some heat source gizmo to improve the hot water resilience, no tank

what's the best way to go?


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:05 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

couple of days we have been having a new boiler installed (with new thermostat & rad controls etc).

also have been recommended to get an outside temperature sensor, keeps the boiler in condensing mode and therefore more efficient


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

"also have been recommended to get an outside temperature sensor, keeps the boiler in condensing mode and therefore more efficient "

i read about this - can someone please explain this to me in laymans terms.

FWIW my boiler lives outside if that makes any difference.....


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:13 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

"We're moving into a solid stone house in a few weeks. Combi boiler, possibly with TRV's, looking at getting a stove fitted too at somepoint in the future. With the thermal mass issue, would we be better off leaving the heating on all day then? "

from prior experiance of my last 2 houses being that type of construction...... YES once our stone houses got cold holy hell it took forever to heat them back up.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Honeywell CM927

I have two of these too.
Theyre very good.

Put it in the middle of the house where there is a radiator WITHOUT a TRV. Set your TRVs in the other rooms to their comfort level, and program the CM927 to aim for a particular temp at anything up to 6 periods during the day and for each day.

Mine is something like 5:30am to 9am @ 18deg, 9am to 3pm 17deg, 3pm to 11pm 18deg and then 16deg overnight.

what about water?

leave it on all the time, or say 2 x 3 hrs / day

do you use more energy reheating it?

with a combi you dont have it producing ho****er at various times - it just produces it on demand (i.e. when you open the tap) so there's no setting for timings.

If you have a boiler and a hot water tank then that's different - but TBH I dont have any experience of the most efficient way of setting the timings for that.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:17 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

"with a combi you dont have it producing ho****er at various times - it just produces it on demand (i.e. when you open the tap) so there's no setting for timings."

depends on the model though stoner - ive got a small tank in mine that can be kept warm all the time or i can get a grant programmer that will only let it warm the water up at certain times.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:19 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

fairynuff.

Im sure we'll get the full going over on our course with the guys up the road at Worcester Bosch sometime. Maybe I can get Bear to guest lecture on Windhagers ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:24 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers Stoner - exactly the advice I was after

ta


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Any heat which you put in will be transferred to cold surfaces before it makes much different to air temps. So if you have a large thermal mass ( think a big slab of concrete) you will need a large amount of heat to transfer to the mass before you'll start warming the air in the building. Sometimes it's better to retain heat in the slab rather than let it lose the heat to atmosphere. It's a very difficult thing to calculate.

A very good use of an OAT sensor is to use it as a hold off for your heating circuit (providing you have a modulating boiler). Find the sweet spot of your building (the lowest temp where you do not need to heat the building to maintain comfort) and set it to hold the heating circuit off if it's above that temp. Then it really doesn't matter what your trvs are doing or who plays with them!

Hot water is a little different. You want the DHW system to hit 60 degc for at least an hour in every 24 ideally ( this is a commercial requirement only but not a bad one). Put it on a timer and lag any pipes you can!


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 2:06 pm
Posts: 7278
Free Member
 

You want the DHW system to hit 60 degc for at least an hour in every 24 ideally

What is the rationale for this because I at present pay to heat water in a house that it unoccupied in the week and would prefer to avoid this unnecessary cost if possible.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 2:56 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

i believe its legionaires - thats why the hot water in the taps in our office seem to be set to 1 degree below scald.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 2:58 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

With the thermal mass issue, would we be better off leaving the heating on all day then?

See, not convinced here. From a physics point of view, your house loses more heat when it's warm (greater temperature differential) so it would make more sense that way to let it cool down overnight and when you're out.

However, if you have weedy heaters (ie not many watts available) and a large heat capacity house (ie big stone barn) then you might struggle to bring the house up to temperature.

OTOH if oyu have a large heat capacity house then it'll stay warm for longer too. This would allow you to turn the heat off earlier in the evening.

Our boiler only runs for a minute or two when it comes on. It's actually more efficient to run it for longer afaik, so from this point of view letting your house cool down might also be good.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

ive given up trying to find an answer for you molly

i came across this and im not sure if its real or a troll.....

[url] http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/experts/article-2156438/How-I-house-warm-costs-down.html [/url]

the comments are commical - alot of them are heading for internal damp issues.

how ever if you dont have a programmable thermostat then your on a hiding to nothing.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 3:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep trail rat. L8 regs.
I'm only trying to help. Listen to molgrips if you want.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 3:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another tip with a condensing boiler to increase efficiency is to use the coolest flow boiler flow temperature that you can.

Try setting the flow temperature to 50degC. This means that the heat exchanger tank is cooler and more flue gases condense on the tank reducing the amount of waste heat chucked out the flue.

If 50 degC doesn't warm your house up enough then you need to increase the flow temperature. As a guide automated systems will automatically control the boiler flow temperature from around 40 degC when the outside temp is around 20 degC and increase it to 80 degC as the outside temps fall to freezing.

Some boilers allow you to buy a module that will automate this process. It's call OAT compensation.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 4:01 pm
Posts: 6126
Full Member
 

With the thermal mass issue, would we be better off leaving the heating on all day then?

See, not convinced here. From a physics point of view, your house loses more heat when it's warm (greater temperature differential) so it would make more sense that way to let it cool down overnight and when you're out.


Interesting this. I live somewhere where it's about -20 outside overnight in winter, and it's very much a case of leaving the heating on 24h with the thermostat - I tried turning off the heating one weekend that we went away, and it took 2 days to get the house (terraced, brick) back up to temperature.
But I've wondered whether letting it drop to, say, 12C during the day, then kick back in an hour before coming home would save any money.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 4:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep. Night set back is a common used energy conservation strategy. 13degC is the usual set point.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 4:16 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

ah yes real world experiance world rather than mathmatical physics world....


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 4:19 pm
Posts: 10980
Free Member
 

We tied that and found that the house temp never dropped below 17 degrees anyway, which must have meant we were well insulated.

I'm sure leaving the CH on all day is better but I've never been able to prove it for myself because we've always done it during cold snaps.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 5:19 pm
 Bear
Posts: 2351
Free Member
 

Molgrips - your boiler and or system are poorly designed if your boiler only runs for a minute or two when it comes on. Probably the boiler is too big for the system and pipework.

Combis, pahhhhh....... horrible things (suit some situations) but are massively overused by the installers because they are easy to fit, five pipes in / out cash in pocket, scrap for copper cylinder thanks very much.

Have a look at the new Honeywell control system, but CM927 are good bits of kit, did a house very every individual room was controlled by one, was a very posh expensive job mind you!


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 7:02 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

How you heat your home depends largely on how you live in it as much as the construction. If you are up and about for a couple of hours in the morning and then in the evening, you only need the heating on long enough for it to come up to the temperature you want, then to maintain that. Twice a day.

All the other things add up too. Remember that any draught is uncontrolled ventilation and you want to reduce them so you aren't heating the street.

interesting one for me this: I've a large detatched house with two bathrooms and a growing family, currently a 20+ year old system boiler and tank

How old are the rads as well? I'v replaced the rads in two house renovations and massively improved the system efficiency. Modern rads are more efficient and you might be able to reduce pipe lengths as well if the existing installation isn't well thought out. Make sure all the rest of the easy wins (insulation, draughtproofing etc) are done as well.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 7:44 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

I'm only trying to help. Listen to molgrips if you want.

No don't, I'm not offering advice, just trying to figure out why the real world experience seems to contradict the physics of it. There must be something I've missed.

Molgrips - your boiler and or system are poorly designed if your boiler only runs for a minute or two when it comes on. Probably the boiler is too big for the system and pipework

That is a distinct possibility. Our house is well insulated and all the rooms have TRVs. There are three small ballast rads in the hall and each landing, the top two are almost off because it gets so damned hot up there. We've got the house fairly comfortable all round, and that's how the boiler operates.

Can it be throttled back I wonder? Maybe the water temp turned down?

Yep. Night set back is a common used energy conservation strategy. 13degC is the usual set point.

Seems like the mechanics of how the heat is delivered and distributed around the house counteract the simple solid body model.

If you are up and about for a couple of hours in the morning and then in the evening, you only need the heating on long enough for it to come up to the temperature you want, then to maintain that.

Isn't that the opposite of what Wrecker says?


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 8:18 pm
Posts: 6126
Full Member
 

Combis, pahhhhh....... horrible things (suit some situations)

How come? Not trolling at all, I genuinely have no idea, and had believed the whole 'they're more efficient' thing.

What're the thoughts on radiators vs underfloor heating?

I'm about to move into a new (old) house, which has an old boiler and water heater; ultimately it probably all needs to be replaced in the name of energy efficiency, but I'm like a baby at a Chelsea game - completely lost.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 14171
Full Member
 

If I had a hot water tank I'd be looking at solar water heating. If you're considering underfloor heating then that works well with solar heating too - but only if you're planning on staying put for a while, otherwise the install cost is unlikely to be covered whilst you live there.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

Isn't that the opposite of what Wrecker says?

Wrecker is largely talking about commercial properties - very few houses have the sort of thermal mass he is talking about. A relatively modern and / or well retrofitted property should be fairly quick to bring up to temperature as it shouldn't lose that much heat anyway. Also, most people dont have multi-temperature thermostats so they would end up heating the house at the same temperature all the time. The evidence is that very few people touch any part of their heating system throughout the day/week/month as well.

I'm about to move into a new (old) house, which has an old boiler and water heater

Depends on the house. If it has wooden floors then you'd be looking at having to replace with something like (low cement) concrete to have the mass.


 
Posted : 28/09/2012 8:38 pm
Page 1 / 2