[i]
ah so. Anyone noticed any pattern?[/i]
Yes. multiple page, maybe over 4...ah, already worked that out eh?
Found the tune assoc. one then... should've added a tune
There is a definite pattern:
1. Glitch happens. 🙁
2. We bitch about it. 😡
3. Mods do nothing. 🙄
4. Repeat. 😉
I declare this glitch officially resolved. 🙂
Cheers.
"Like"
🙂
But not until we get to four pages - just to be sure...
Tom - AdministratorI declare this glitch officially resolved.
Cheers.
[img]
[/img]
.
Glitch bump test!
Testing testing...
One
Two
Three!
Four?
Stoopid sunnuvaglitch
FIVE Gooooo-old Glitches.
Test
Still testing
Durrr
Ninety nine!
(Generously setting it up for someone...)
My first WUNUNDRED (I think).
I declare this glitch officially resolved.
Brilliant. Thank you.
Would you be amenable to telling us what it was, out of curiosity?
Wununurdundwun
This kind of thing could push me towards subscribing.
By jove, they've done it!
glitchy bump
[edit] Sorry, force of habit.
A glitch in time saves nine.
As you can imagine there's a count used by the pagination which would sometimes not represent the proper count. You might think that was because of some deletions not updating the count but that is not obviously the case. In fact there could be many weird and wonderful reasons for the count being off. The relatively straightforward solution is to not worry too much about the primary cause of the miscount right now, but just to make sure the number is correct. It doesn't remove the glitch, and you may occasionally spot an occasion where the count is off for some reason and the pagination goes weird, but the count will get regularly checked and updated and the problems will not persist as they did.Would you be amenable to telling us what it was, out of curiosity?
Not fixed. See the speeding ticket thread.
Argh! Maybe this thread doesn't have enough pages yet..
See the speeding ticket thread
You've probably just helped identify the original problem. Thanks.
Seemed that when I clicked on that link it took me straight to a "Reply" box.
You've probably just helped identify the original problem.
I'd be interested in knowing exactly what the problem was.
Oh and if it helps, I've had to code pagination before and it's remarkably tricky.
So, skeptical cat was right? 😉
JoeG - Member
So, skeptical cat was right?
[img] 
[/img]