[Closed] Might have bought a lemon (used car).

If it's missing a service stamp and no receipts to show it had that service, the warranty was almost certainly void as soon as it came into effect.

Hora speaks sense, don't get dragged into the warranty route, it's a sale of goods issue but go in lightly without reciting the sale of goods act, just know your rights/his obligations when he tries to wiggle out of it!

Standard warranty is 4 months so unless you've extended or they offer more (which if its from a form garage they should) then you're ok

If not then definitely speak to the dealer anyway, they should help. Worst comes to worst negotiate for a part exchange on another car

But, in case that doesn't work, keep a pair of these in the boot….

[img] [/img]

😉

we need a bigger photo binners.

[edit] you edited.

I got a bit carried away with the level of violence required 😳

Dammit, I just sold my old bombers to a mate.

I spoke to the dealer who can apparently 100% guarantee that the problem wasn't there when I bought the car.

What do I do now?

Letter of rejection as a next step?

How can they 100% guarantee the problem was not there? Don't roll over! Fight the man!

What did you tell him was the issue to allow him to be 100% sure it wasn't there when you bought the car?

I think you need to go down and see him rather than dealing with this over the phone.

What do I do now?

Tell him that sounds impressive, and you eagerly await the proof?

I bought my car from a dealer about 3 years ago (a 1.6 petrol c-max, so a different engine), 5 months and 3 weeks later a power steering hose split (common ford fault, depsite it being a generic goodridge hose that probably gets fitted in a lot of cars).

I'd be 100% sure it was fine when they sold it to me. But it was their job to fix it and they did.

I'd not try rejecting just yet, go in in person and press them to fix the problem.

And I'm never convinced by the 'supermarket fuel did it' claims. Tesco don't have any refineries in the UK, and neither do Shell. They might stick an aditive in to do one thing or another but:

a) if they did, don't you think they'd make more of a song and dance about it, after all it's costing them money to do.
b) it's the same basic fuel whichever garage you go to, from whichever refinery was closest/cheepest. If there was some uncombustible crap in it, it would appear at more retailers.

I guess it comes down to who can prove what.

The last MOT was done at 58,000 ish (so not many miles between that and us buying it). If there was oil burning at that time, would it have shown up on the emissions test?

It's about what you can reasonably expect from a car you've bought secondhand from a dealer, not whether it was a pre-existing problem.

My view is that it's not reasonable for it to fail in this way after so few miles. If you agree then you need to actually go and visit the dealer, park the car outside and have a row with them. Pick a busy time for them.

[b]piemann

Citizens advice bureau is your friend now
Consumer helpline
08454
04 05 06

You will get all the help you need...you will go round in circles on this thread, get some ADVICE ASAP

Your local office of fair trading also would take a keen interest...[/b]

It's about what you can reasonably expect from a car you've bought secondhand from a dealer, [b]not whether it was a pre-existing problem.[/b]

Not true for used cars

OFT.GOV.UK "http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/676408/oft1241.pdf"

I guess it can work both ways;
[i]
You are liable for faults with the vehicle
that were present at the time you sold it
(where they mean the vehicle was not of
satisfactory quality), even though they
may only become apparent later on –
so called ‘latent’ or ‘inherent’ faults.
In some instances the specific fault
complained about may not have been
present at the time of purchase but the
inherent cause of the problem could have
rendered the vehicle unsatisfactory at the
time of sale.[/i]

I think i'd consider what's happened a latent fault - ie. it was present at time of sale but not detectable. Assuming it is cylinder/valve wear causing the problem it won;t have happened that quickly.

My last 2p (honest);

I guess the first thing is to get the car back to them get a diagnosis see if they think the warranty covers it and if not start arguing?

Intrigued as to what Flicker knows about these engines, the Duratec is in a lot of vehicles, being chain driven and going on the fact they are still in production after 21 years you'd expect them to be pretty reliable? no?

Hope this all works out.

Have actually looked at a couple of Focus C-Max and Mondeo Estates for about 3k with around 70K miles recently.
Have a little one on the way and currently have a Passat 130 PD that's just about on 185,000, starting to develop lots of little niggles (none engine related though) figured we'd get something that's not potentially going to cost a lot in the very near future, going by threads on here though, I should maybe just keep the Passat?!

Dont think its really fair to call the duratec 21 years old. Especially since its pretty much just a brand name ford give to petrol dohc engines they happen to use...they are not even all ford engines.

Have actually looked at a couple of Focus C-Max and Mondeo Estates for about 3k with around 70K miles recently.
Have a little one on the way and currently have a Passat 130 PD that's just about on 185,000, starting to develop lots of little niggles (none engine related though) figured we'd get something that's not potentially going to cost a lot in the very near future, going by threads on here though, I should maybe just keep the Passat?!

http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?t=14319

Im bored and stuck in baku so i googled.

Apparently a very common issue on this mazda designed engine. Throwing mazda 3 1.8 into google has thrown up some useful stuff i think see my link.

Positive crankcase vent is a major service item every 30k miles- when was yours last done ?

* edit - seems i have the wrong engine in mind

* no im right it is the mazda engine.

I was just going on the wiki page:
[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Duratec_engine ]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Duratec_engine[/url]

Fair point though, 9 years not 21 years:
Duratec-HE 1.8 L, 2.0 L - 2005–present - DOHC I4

Checked the MOT history/notes?

The 1.8 in the focus is a belt driven engine, the one in the Mondeo is a chain cam engine. We had the belt driven 1.8 110 bhp in our focus. Then they brought out a 125 bhp model a few months later. Don't know of any generic problems with this engine. We had ours for 8yrs up to 103 k. Only problem was crap in the plenum and a sticky egr valve. I suspect the problem lies here. Could it be the breather pipes sucking oil into the inlet side. Ours was absolutely blocked solid. The only other thing is the oil control rings on the pistons. Very unusual this though.

The 1.8 in the focus is a belt driven engine, the one in the Mondeo is a chain cam engine

Sure you're not referring to the belt driven Zetec?
Zetec was Mk1 focus, Duratec Mk2 onwards

Recent Duratec (that era) was alloy head and chain timing vs cast iron head and belt timing.

So, you've had 4 months use of the car, & are now after rejecting it? Good luck with that one.

I purchased a car many moons ago, and to cut a long story short there was an issue with the cambelt within 2 months or so. The garage I got it from played awkward (little **** of a salesman), so via the warranty went I went elsewhere to find the fault which became an engine stripdown/repair.

Even with an RAC report stating the problem that garage number 2 confirmed, the original garage still played awkward until I picked up the phone to Trading Standards, they then decided to play ball and fix the fault 'as a goodwill gesture, advised by his lawyer'.

What yr did the focus change to a mk 2. Think the mk 2s were chain driven. Think the problem is hopefully just the emission control engine breathing pulling oil from the crankcase and burning it. Where else can that quantity of oil go. It can't be leaking you'd see it on the engine.

What yr did the focus change to a mk 2

2005

Think the problem is hopefully just the emission control engine breathing pulling oil from the crankcase and burning it

dodgy rings = lots of crank pressure = oil pushed out through breathers (etc) ?

An I missing something here? I thought it was standard 60 days on used cars and that was your lot?

thinking about it - it would pretty much have to be an unhindered communication path.

my old 19j diesel has a cracked piston and smokes like a goodun - doesnt even drink 6litres in 3 weeks .... more like a litre in 6 months....

I am sure that if you were burning that amount of oil, you would not see any traffic behind you for blue smoke.

any update fella ?

Went to the dealers yesterday. It was all frightfully civilised. We stated our case. He maintains his position that the car was fine when we bought it and isn't in a position to repair/replace/refund. No big surprises there.

Now it all goes in writing and if no resolution can be agreed, citizens advice recommend speaking to my credit card company and opening a dispute through them.

It's not likely to be a quick process. Will update as and when we hear more.