kilimanjaro - celeb...
 

MegaSack DRAW - 6pm Christmas Eve - LIVE on our YouTube Channel

[Closed] kilimanjaro - celebs

87 Posts
56 Users
0 Reactions
281 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

did they get helicoptered off?
blouses!


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:00 pm
Posts: 2023
Free Member
 

thought it was an advert for the take that back catalogue....


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nope they walked back down..
Fair play to them i say.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:06 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

did you a little spoon fed imho but yeah, all for a good cause!


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good on them for doing it........ but I did notice on the last climb it was supposed to be -20C and 75MPH winds according to the captions at the bottom of the screen.............I just don't believe that looking at the footage(Unless of course it was blowing them up hill.)


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its the porters I have respect for, that must carry those massive bags up and down every week.

Who sponsors them?


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

can helicopters fly that high? thought they were restricted on max altitued by the air density.

Was entertaining to watch though, impressed that Moyles made it up. He seemed the least affected by the altitude. Backs up my beer and pies diet 🙂


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:20 pm
Posts: 11507
Full Member
 

[i]Who sponsors them?[/i]

They get paid! And tipped afterwards. Something like 120 people in all including the porters went up the mountain, BT funded the trip.

Anyone know what the music was whilst they were scaling the vertical cliff bit?


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

can helicopters fly that high?

Yes - far higher. They've landed one on the summit of Everest - though that's not a normal heli. Not sure if a standard one would make it, but I don't suppose you need something particularly special.

What vertical cliff bit, spooky? I was watching as they talked about it, but they seemed not to have filmed that bit.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A specially equiped Squirrel chopper landed on the summmit of Everest (About 29,000ft) - so yes, some can.

Mainly dependant on power though, thiner air for the blades to work efficently and less oxygen for the engine to work efficently.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:28 pm
Posts: 34
Free Member
 

yep will impressed with moyles, fair play to them all really. Looks like they were sponsored by Berghaus and TNF !!!


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:28 pm
Posts: 11507
Full Member
 

[i]What vertical cliff bit, spooky?[/i]

The Baranco Wall, 300m vertical climb. Guide told them to put their poles away as they need their hands, at the top it was misty and Moyles complained there was no view.

Music sort of eerie, 4 chords (?) each higher than before, then repeating.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh, you mean the grade 1 scramble.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There'll have been plenty watched that tonight so they could have slated them.
I think those people will be quite disappointed as it looks like they all did their bit. Good on them I say. I gave them my £1 and well worth it in my book.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
 

Oh, you mean the grade 1 scramble.

listen to yourself like your Ranulph Fiennes.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

like your Ranulph Fiennes.

Why, is he a mountaineer?

Not slating them, just the TV production who insist in calling what was really only a grade 1 scramble (anything more and they'd have been roping that lot) a vertical cliff.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 6898
Full Member
 

Got to agree about the 75mph winds bit - complete tosh. Anyone stuck their hand/head out the car window on the motorway lately? Sure it might have been uncomfortably windy but not 75mph.

Fair play to them though.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
 

Not slating them, just the TV production who insist in calling what was really only a grade 1 scramble (anything more and they'd have been roping that lot) a vertical cliff.

fair enough it just appears that a bunch of celebs are using their fame to raise ££££ for some others good, but thats still not good enough for STW members.


 
Posted : 12/03/2009 9:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not a big fan of moyles but haven't they raised £1.4 million. 😯

They're a load of cosseted celebs so all way out of their comfort zones. I'm sure all the rufty tufty types on here would have done it on their own in a couple of days whilst carrying all their own gear and a downhill bike so they style it up on the way down

Good on the celebs I say.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 5:49 am
Posts: 7337
Free Member
 

"[i]I'm not a big fan of moyles but haven't they raised £1.4 million[/i]"

They could have doubled it if they'd had a sponsored "Leave the Fat ****er at the Top" appeal.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 7:05 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

I tried to watch it but I couldn't cope with the awful moaning and bleating from Fearne "Crikey, it's amazing what make up does for a woman" Cotton.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 7:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its not a particularly hard route (thats why it was chosen) but fair play to them for doing it. Its not easy, in fact even a short period at anything over 15000ft can become uncomfortable...however the big fuss about them being "heroes" is a load of tosh - Lcp Johnson Beharry hes a real hero.

There isnt anyone on this forum who couldnt get their arse up Kili with a bit of application.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 7:43 am
Posts: 3371
Free Member
 

I'd had quite enough of "Gary's back" after 20 minutes.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 7:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good effort by them. Hyped the danger as it's for TV. Probably is the hardest thing they will ever do.

Wonder how much they'd raise in a sponsored "i'm not doing that again".

Respect to the poor porter that had to carry the portaloos and they should have made Moyles carry his own radio kit.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 7:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

to all the naysayers who say it wasn't -20 and 75mph winds, i have inside information that it was. i know one of the production team.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 7:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well done to all of them for raising the money but it is not really a difficult feat.

I first did it when I was 12 and up the Great Western Breach Ice Fall walking in from Kenya. Done it 3 times since only once on the tourist route which took 3 days up and down carrying all our own gear, and I am not a 'Mountaineer'!


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 8:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Next year I am carrying my bike up and riding down 😀


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 8:07 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

I did it when I was 2 years old using hot tar as shoes whilst carrying a herd of local wilderbeast and fended off lion attacks using a ballon on a stick.

Van Outen looks ropey as.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 8:54 am
Posts: 8933
Full Member
 

Fearne Cotton went? My least-like Radio 1 DJ... It's a close thing between her and Moyles, so a lot of good could have been done by leaving them both at the summit.

I briefly saw the start where they said the "marathon runner Ronan" was "struggling" in the high altitude test chamber, whereas fat-**** Moyles seemed to be ok.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 8:59 am
 Soup
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fair play to them I say. They've raised more money than anyone on here.

Yes they're celebs, yes they get pampered, yes they moaned, yes it's all edited and made to look harder than it is, but at the end of the day it's tv, they've raised loads of cash and they've been to the top of Kilimanjaro and the majority of us on here haven't, so hats off to them all.

Cue STWer 'I've actually done it twice and it only took me 2 days and all I had was a Mars bar and my camelbak, etc etc etc.'


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 9:47 am
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No chance there were 75mph winds, they would have been getting blown off their feet.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 9:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm disappointed in the lack of STW curmudgeon-yness. I don't understand the logic of watching vapid "celebrities" doing something fun for charidee whilst entreating lowly mortals back home to part with their money. I bet most of us would love an opportunity to climb Kilimanjaro, hardly picking unpleasant tasks for themselves are they? Next year it's going to be a lying on the beach in Hawaii marathon with Dale Winton.
I would sponsor Moyles to do a real job for a week, or just to shut up for that matter, but not to go on a walking holiday.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 9:52 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

If any of the funds raised tonight are earmarked to feed the malnourished, I hope that Cheryl Cole and Fern Cotton are the first in the queue.
Eat, you dozy mares.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 9:55 am
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

At least it's sponsorship for something that is at least challenging and requires a bit of commitment and effort. My wife was asked by her colleague if she would sponsor her to do a five mile [b]walk[/b] for charity!!! Five miles?? that's a lunchtime stroll for me.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:01 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

can helicopters fly that high?

[img] [/img]
Thats the top of Everest that is. Reached with a production helicopter (AS350).

[img] [/img]
A not quite as successful helicopter at base camp.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:02 am
Posts: 3729
Free Member
 

"I bet most of us would love an opportunity to climb Kilimanjaro, hardly picking unpleasant tasks for themselves are they?"

Kilimanjaro is over 5500m above sea level. Have you ever been at this sort of altitute? The highest I've ever been is 1000m lower than this and that was incredibly hard work and certainly nothing like lying on a beach in Hawaii.

I think I read that one of them was helicoptered off but this was due to altitude sickness


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

heroes one and all. sniff. wipes tear from eye. God bless 'em.

jesus, they'll show any old sh1t on the telly these days.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No gonefishin, I haven't been to that sort of altitude, that's rather my point. I don't underestimate the challenges of altitude but a trip climbing Kili would still be a dream holiday for many of us outdoorsy types, as would Hawaii for those less energetic. Individual altitude tolerance by the way is pretty hard to predict and poorly related to cardiovascular fitness.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:17 am
Posts: 3403
Free Member
 

I didn't watch it but I'm with Repack I think. I haven't done it but I've no doubt it ain't easy, so hats off to them for getting up and down. But I think these things are cheapened by efforts to make it sound harder than it is. It's not a climb, it's a walk. There aren't any technical climbing bits on it. All credit to them for what they've done, but I'm not inclined to extend that credit to things they haven't done, like climbing 300m vertical faces.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:21 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Im dead fit but found it hard to smoke a fag without wheezing on the Klein Matterhorn, its only about 3400m.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lactic - Member
No gonefishin, I haven't been to that sort of altitude, that's rather my point. I don't underestimate the challenges of altitude but a trip climbing Kili would still be a dream holiday for many of us outdoorsy types, as would Hawaii for those less energetic.

But isn't that the point of them doing it? ie it is outside of there comfort zone and hard for them plus not something that they would normally dream of doing.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:25 am
 Soup
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

jesus, they'll show any old sh1t on the telly these days.

FFS - it's a bloody charity tv show. If you don't like it, switch it off.

They raise money for kids who otherwise stand little chance of living for much longer. Get a grip.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]If you don't like it, switch it off.[/i]
I did. HTH.

[i]
They raise money for kids who otherwise stand little chance of living for much longer. Get a grip. [/i]
Jolly good. I didn't criticise this. It was still shit TV. HTH.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's all kind of self fullfilling. They choose celebs rather than plebs for these things 'cos they know they'll get more free publicity which equals more cash.... Moyles barely managed 5 minutes without mentioning it for weeks before hand. But then they have to make sure the celebs make it up and that it looks suitably challenging otherwise all the people who chipped in will feel cheated.

What's depressing is that it takes crap like this to induce people to give to charity. If you want to help kids there is nothing to stop you donating your money to any number of charities at any time of the year....


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Owen you might have a point if it had been a party of Moyles, Johnny Vegas, Jo Brand and Rik Waller. I reckon most people watching would love the opportunity to travel to Africa and climb a mountain, rather than seeing it as some sort of chore to be endured.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chris, totally agree that the fact we need a celebrity lovefest in order to get people to give to charity is depressing. I know sending non-celebs wouldn't get much publicity, I just think the celebs should have come up with a different money making scheme to simply being filmed going on holiday.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:46 am
Posts: 7337
Free Member
 

"[i]Fair play to them I say. They've raised more money than anyone on here[/i]"

Seriously, arrange with my boss for me to take off all the time necessary for the training etc. with no loss of income. Organise all the publicity I need. Fly me over there first class. Arrange a load of porters to carry my stuff up the mountain and I'll be there. Oh, a week or so recovery would be nice too.

"[i]What's depressing is that it takes crap like this to induce people to give to charity. If you want to help kids there is nothing to stop you donating your money to any number of charities at any time of the year....[/i]"

Agreed.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:47 am
Posts: 1897
Free Member
 

Good effort. It's not easy to do and for [i]all [/i] of them to get to the top in 7 days was remarkable. I have been to that altitude and it's not easy. To carry on climbing when you've had vomit coming out of your nose is a pretty good effort for a wee lassie.

Particularly impressed by the fat bloke actually.

It was probably -20 but no way was it 75mph. You can barely stand up in that and at those temperatures exposed flesh would freeze in minutes.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:50 am
Posts: 0
 

I have been up to point Lenana on mount kenya (4985m)and 4500m in the himalayas so can confidently say good effort to all of them well done. But would agree about temp and wind speed. You also don't feel great every day just because you are around fantastic scenery so moaning a bit comes with the territory.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 10:57 am
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

scruff - Member
Im dead fit but found it hard to smoke a fag without wheezing on the Klein Matterhorn, its only about 3400m.

I hope you put the butt in your pocket. I used to live in Zermatt and the number of fag butts littered under the lifts is astounding/disgusting once the snow has melted.

As for 'celebs' hiking up a mountain, considering 2 of them are worth ten times the money they raised, it feels rather wrong that they're off having fun in Africa and then asking us to cough up a couple of quid. I'm quite happy to give to charity though.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:05 am
Posts: 3000
Full Member
 

the thing is, yes people 'should' give to charity without needing entertainment in return, but they don't.

Hugh Dennis was on R5 this morning, according to him all the red nose days have raised over half a billion pounds.

Now lots of that money would not have been raised without Dawn French snogging Hugh Grant, Lenny Henry and his 'wacky' suits and famous people doing things like going up big mountains.

Like it or not, half a billion pounds isn't bad from voluntary donations focused on 1 day every 2 years...if that means cheryl cole and fatty moyles get a trip to kenya so be it, a dad of 2 with a bad back from Pembroke just isn't going to generate the same level of interest!


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:14 am
Posts: 1897
Free Member
 

You call watching a child die in a hospital and vomiting through your nose fun?

What makes you think they didn't put their hands in their pockets anyway. I can guarantee they all did.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sponging - if you do a charity bike ride, say, isn't the idea to get people to sponsor you to do it? I didn't reailse that you also had to put a % of your hard earned in there too.

Quite a few people on here need to get a grip. frankly, I don't really care what they do, the fact is they raised a shed load of money, and, probably going to save peoples lives as a result. I put my fiver into it quite happily. was good to see cole in outdoors mode too, and cotton really did look in a bad way at times, so fair play to them all.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be honest Donald I'd be more worried about how the child was feeling than the Celeb. If they want to make documentaries to demonstrate suffering in Africa, fantastic. Why not sponsor them to stay on and help in the hospital for a week rather than bogging off up a mountain?


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:25 am
Posts: 41688
Free Member
 

Id hardly call projectile vomiting and the shits "having fun in Africa" , or is that the latest STW fetish/niche.

As as for the "us outdoorsy types would love to do that" whats your point?
-People run marathons for charity, but theres thousands of people in the world who would probably do that in 4 hours on a sunday mornign with no training.

-There's people with red hair, but we still paid our boss for coming in with his hair sprayed.

-I'm sure some wierdo's would love to take a bath in custard/beans but i'd still chuck in a couple of quid to see someone do it.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Having just done this a couple of months ago I enjoyed watching it as it brought back the memories. For a reasonably fit person its not a fitness challenge at all, its about how your body copes with the altitude, which you cannot predict. I had terrible headaches and remember well the regular 2 hour stops for painkillers and food on the final summit day, forcing myself to eat chocolate (a rare experience!)as I knew I needed the energy. One of our group had to be carried down off the mountain, and another was throwing up every 15 minutes at one point. It is definitely the hardest thing I've ever done, and compared to what some people ask me for charity money for (just wait until Run For Life time, 5km walk/run...) I think its a more worthy bit of effort.

I was very miffed to see the girls loo though.... they didn't have that on my trip! It was the same company that I did the walk with, I recognised some of the porters and the guide helping Ferne was our Guide leader Naiman.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:33 am
Posts: 1897
Free Member
 

To be honest Donald I'd be more worried about how the child was feeling than the Celeb.

As would I. But I wouldn't class either as "fun".


Why not sponsor them to stay on and help in the hospital for a week rather than bogging off up a mountain?

OK Here's how it works. The people who are good at saving babies work in the hospitals. The people who are good at raising money raise money. Making documentaries to demonstrate the suffering in Africa is very worthy but how much money will it raise? Chris Moyles can do ten times more good by climbing a hill than he can by working in a hospital.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:37 am
 Soup
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Donald, I couldn't have put it better myself.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:41 am
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I am doing a sponsored bike ride this summer and, yes, I will be contributing towards the sponsorship money, but your point is well received.

It's great that so much money can be raised for charity by whatever means. I don't think this whole climb for charity thing was bad, but I feel uncomfortable with multi-millionaires telling me to dig-deep. I would like to think that they contributed towards their total. Donald, how exactly can you guarantee that they did? Because Heat magazine says they're all bloody good blokes?

As for watching children die in hospital, of course it's not fun but I don't need Bono to fly around the world to Zambia in his private jet to tell me it's happening. However, I appreciate that the large majority of our population do.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:41 am
Posts: 6707
Free Member
Posts: 1897
Free Member
 

Donald, how exactly can you guarantee that they did?

Do you honestly think they didn't? How could you be involved in something like that and having a few spare quid in your pocket not chip in. If they were the type of person to do that then they wouldn't be there in the first place. Of course if they state the fact that they give to charity then someone will rip into them for advertising their selflessness.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thanks for letting me know how it works Donald, there was me thinking that Moyles could be a brain surgeon. He could however have a go as a porter or help with maintenance. With a full TV crew and support staff they could raise money from the viewing public, who love reality hospital shows, and actually improve the hospital.
I have no objection to celeb hospital visits if that's what it takes, although who thinks that a dying child is not sufficiently compelling viewing without a breakfast DJ in attendance is beyond me. But you can't say that the fact they raised money from their hiking trip is a justification, I think people recognise a good cause and give despite the celebrity's mountain jolly.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:57 am
Posts: 91097
Free Member
 

He seemed the least affected by the altitude.

Ability to cope with altitude is random - right fat lazy b*stards can have the gift, and hardcore mountaineers might not. It's a bit like having a high VO2 max. I'd like to find out if I have the gift or not - went up to about 3,400m when I was younger - didn't notice any difference apart from being pretty knackered in general but then that's not that high.

Apparently you can ride to the top of Kilimanjaro - can't you?


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 11:59 am
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

it just didn't make very good TV

I'll give them some credit for doing it, but I would have given them a lot more if they'd have carried their own kit, funded it themselves and not been so pampered


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 15977
Free Member
 

Brakes - my thoughts exactly, I could not beleive how much they got helped up the hill. All they literraly appeared to be carrying was a little water in a camlebak, and when it got a little steeper even that came off! Most people carry their own tent & ALL gear!

I dont believe that was 75mph winds either, at that kind of speed they would struggle to keep so upright and the camera man/woman would definately be struggling to hold the camera steady.

Fair play to them though in terms of reaching the top, I'v only ever been up to 4200m, and that was uncomfortable.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:21 pm
Posts: 91097
Free Member
 

Maybe it was 75mph winds when the cameras weren't rolling. Or it got edited out.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Some special crap spouted in this thread.

For a start you can't stand up in sustained 75mph wind, and that sort of windspeed at -20C is deadly without very specialist kit.

Secondly, that pic of a helicopter is [i]not[/i] over everest (some 'copters can go very high, but most can't get anywhere near the summit of kili).


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:34 pm
Posts: 76
Free Member
 

i found some weather forecasts if anyone really wants to know - looks like it could have possibly -20 with wind chill, but 75mph winds are unlikely.
http://www.snow-forecast.com/resorts/Kilimanjaro/6day/top
wind chill chart
http://www.sat.dundee.ac.uk/arb/durc/windchill.html

i think anyone who raises money for a half decent charity (nothing that involves cats counts!) deserves some credit.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:35 pm
Posts: 23223
Full Member
 

There are some miserable ****ers on here.

It raised £1.4m before it was shown. That is 280,000 mosquito nets worth. 280,000 people who may not end up dead as a result. On top of that how many of the millions of people that watched it will dip their hands into there pockets? Quite a few with a bit of luck.

I'll give them some credit for doing it
Well that's mighty big of you. What are you going to do to raise over a million?

Good TV - Not especially
Minor celebs - Certainly
Loads of cash raised - Definitely

Some people on here need to get a grip.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lactic - Member
Thanks for letting me know how it works Donald, there was me thinking that Moyles could be a brain surgeon. He could however have a go as a porter or help with maintenance.

What make you think that working in maintenace is any eaiser than being a brain surgeon? It takes years of training and skill to be able to do it i wouldn't want any celeb near my hospital and the machines here.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:46 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didn't say a helicopter didn't 'land' on everest, just that that picture wasn't of everest.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 1:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

fauxbyfour - Member
Next year I am carrying my bike up and riding down

Thats a terrible statement, how very dare you indeed.

I intend to ride up it (without dabbing) and then ride down it on a Chipper, IN A DAY, next year in the bleak of winter wearing only a mankini.
(With no water and eating only half a tic tac)

and after "like road clean wit tongue"

Its for "charuty mate!"


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If they'd have organised the trip themselves, paid for it out of their own extortionate wages and carried and cooked their own way to the top, with a couple of guides, a doctor and a hand held camera to recored their adventures . . .

. . . . that would be worth supporting and would be a lot more interesting!


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 2:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fearne Cotton went? My least-like Radio 1 DJ... It's a close thing between her and Moyles, so a lot of good could have been done by leaving them both at the summit.

I'd have doubled their money if they'd have hiked up and thrown Jo Whiley off the top 😈


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 76
Free Member
 

could you chuck off chappers and scott mills whilst your at it


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 2:35 pm
Posts: 23223
Full Member
 

. . . . that would be worth supporting and would be a lot more interesting!

So it wasn't worth support? In your eyes this was a worthless venture because they didn't carry their own kit? FFS.

It was a charity stunt to raise money. Grow up.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm probably going to regret saying this!! But what annoys me is every year all this money we raise and put towards the bottomless pit of Africa when there are millions of causes/charities we could be supporting and problems we could be fixing in the UK but we don't!

Oh well I gave Comic Relief my £1 this morning to get the man in the bear costume to leave me alone!!!

Boring TV programme though. All whinged having done "6 months" training! But fair play it was for charity. Enough said.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So it wasn't worth support? In your eyes this was a worthless venture?

This venture hasn't anyway in the slightest persuaded me to dig into my oft bare pockets, no!

In fact it's had quite the opposite effect, maybe something I see tonight will have the desired effect!

So worthy of my support, no. Worthy of support in general, obviously to some yes!


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 23223
Full Member
 

maybe something I see tonight will have the desired effect!
Better drop Richard Curtis a line and tell him to do something extra special tonight for your 50p.

If you don't want to give money to charity then fair enough, but don't pass judgement on those that do want to raise some cash because they were too famous to carry their own pack or they took the easy route up. Surely the important thing is that they did it at all and as a result somebodies shit life may just get a little better.


 
Posted : 13/03/2009 3:39 pm
Page 1 / 2