How much does it co...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] How much does it cost to have a helicopter on hover for hours on end?

73 Posts
37 Users
0 Reactions
260 Views
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Because that's how much the pathetic excuses for "students" are costing the taxpayer at the moment. The effing things have been overhead all day. ALL DAY! That's a huge waste of money to police the idiotic morons who have turned a legitimate protest in to a potentially violent protest worthy of the police spending so much to police it.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:03 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

the urban myth in my head has it at three grand an hour


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

my guess is it costs less than bankers tax evasion


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:05 pm
Posts: 23164
Full Member
 

along the same lines a the plane/conveyor belt a helicopter can hover over a fairground waltzer almost effortlessly and at very little cost to the taxpayer - especially if its 'danger night' and all the fairground rides are free


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:08 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

been on photoshoots over central london in a helicopter and IIRC it was about £2k an hour (you need a twin engine to fly over london)


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not very useful but - apparently less than hiring a power boat for the same journey. So I had the misfortune to discover recently.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:09 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

what so my urban myth lobe is wrong?


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But they're going to be saving the taxpayer loads now (almost) all state funding for higher education is being cut and the future "pathetic excuses for students" will be paying it themselves.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:15 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

Devon and Cornwall Police:

The all inclusive cost is £1675 per hour, this includes everything including fuel, staff and insurance. The unit has an annual budget of 1,000 hours per year, an average of 2.75 flying hours per day.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


the urban myth in my head has it at three grand an hour

nonk, you are probably not far off the truth. When i worked offshore, each crew change chopper cost circa seven grand to put in the air.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:31 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

lifed parts and all that?


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One has a heli-pad for it to land on.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

You have the police copter and sky copter and the
bbc copter, along with anyone else who can fly a fan.

Sure it wasnt a pretend one held up by wires.

It could also be that windsor lad coming home to see daddy at buck house, he flys one.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:39 pm
Posts: 3834
Free Member
 

A Chinook costs £5k an hour plus £165k a month whether it flys or not.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:40 pm
Posts: 3834
Free Member
 

A Chinook costs £5k an hour plus £165k a month whether it flys or not.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:41 pm
Posts: 31061
Free Member
 

Poor troll flushfart. Very poor. I expected better from your privately educated self. Money can't buy everything eh?


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Blimey it's gone up.. Budum tish..


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not only a poor troll, but a lazy troll too.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:49 pm
 igm
Posts: 11844
Full Member
 

Police -v- students? I'm supporting the students.

Student protest is what they are meant to be doing - get on with it. 'Twas the poll tax in my day.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:53 pm
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

3k an hour an hour for the mountain rescue Sea king,according to MR mates.Not that anybody needs rescuing by heli(according to the cuts being made to RAF search and rescue by Tories)


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

daddy at buck house,

Daddy lives in Gloucestershire though so his sat nav is crap if he's at Buckhouse ,unless he has gone to see nanny


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 10:06 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

don't worry flash, in 10 years time there won't be enough graduates that could afford to get through university and into pilot officer training in the raf and navy - ergo no helicopter pilots in the police wasting fuel.

i can suddenly see some sense in the govts' cuts after all.


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 10:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So why is the helicopter needed for this? Apart from its needed to be in the air to justify its expense.

What serious crimes are being prevented or detected by the copter?


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 10:13 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

...in 10 years time there won't be enough graduates that could afford to get through university and into pilot officer training in the raf and navy - ergo no helicopter pilots...

Army Air Corps - you don't need a degree!


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 10:16 pm
 Andy
Posts: 3346
Full Member
 

MrSmith - Member
been on photoshoots over central london in a helicopter and IIRC it was about £2k an hour [b][u](you need a twin engine to fly over london)[/u][/b]

PAGING ELFIN PAGING ELFIN to the forum please 😀


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here I am!

I like these sort of threads. They serve to expose the bigoted narrow-mindedness inherent in some Little Englanders, as well as their selfish hypocrisy.

I fully support anyone who chooses to exercise their democratic right to protest. Fortunately, it looks like these demonstrations will continue, which will really make Flashy's ring itch. This can only be a Good Thing.

Flashy's just jealous, 'cos they've got the balls to actually publicly stand up for what they believe in, rather than cower behind a stupid persona behind a keyboard. He can only dream of having such stones...

Oh, and as for the cost; the Countryside Alliance demonstration, that Flashy claims he was on, cost many, many times more than the recent student protests, to police. Personally, I think they should've just turned the water cannons on the filthy bumpkins and blasted them back into the sticks, but there you go. 😉


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 11:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They serve to expose the bigoted narrow-mindedness inherent in some Little Englanders, as well as their elfish hypocrisy.

Elfish hypocrisy ?............you think small english geezers should stick together then ?

btw, did you know that "popcorn" is rhyming slang for "Little Englanders" ?

As in : popcorn and maltesers = small geezers

Although it can get a tad confusing, as it can also be used when you go to the pictures, as in when you go up to the kiosk and say, "I'll have one of them large packets of small geezers please love"


 
Posted : 30/11/2010 11:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You are [i]such[/i] an idiot.

And so ugly, that your face is twinned with the Soviet mining town of Magnitogorsk. 🙁

Go away and wash yourself and have some Cucumber.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:02 am
Posts: 13289
Full Member
 

they've got the balls to actually publicly stand up for what they believe in

Do you really believe this? I have to say I have not yet heard a protester, or many other folk for that matter, who have been able to articulate their argument against the proposed scheme in a manner that indicates to me that they actually understand it or have done enough research to comprehend the merits or otherwise when compared to the current state of affairs. To protest from a position of knowledge is OK by me, but to do so from a position of ignorance makes you a bit of a dick.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:07 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

lol lol and thrice lol at elfin.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know what I'm talking about with these here evil Tory plans. But it's too cold to protest and since I'm at a posh uni (that I couldn't afford to go to should these plans go ahead despite working my backside off to get the grades to get in) I'm just going to write a letter.

Failing that I'll start cobbing fire extinguishers at bucktoothed people wearing barbour jackets and driving range rovers but for now a stern letter should show 'em.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:34 am
Posts: 13289
Full Member
 

Explain to me how you would not be able to afford to go given there is no up front cost?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:36 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

its a point well made convert.
but no lets have a riot. 🙄


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ah no up front cost, that's okay then.

Do you really find it so difficult to imagine that people don't want to get into massive debt before they start working?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:43 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

no.
but there is no money.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I couldn't afford to be saddled with the debt afterwards and the parents couldn't bail me out because funnily enough they don't have £40000 either. It'd be too crippling. The minimum amount to start paying it back is not a lot of money and having money like that taken out of the low wages I'd start up on would just be too much. It'd make more sense to go straight into work and be unskilled. Either that or go to a university that's not as good and charges less, despite having the grades to do more, and not reach the potential I should be able to and be less employable. Opportunities are blocked by increasing costs. The grades needed to get in should go up if they want to lower numbers then it would be a fairer system for the brightest people, not the richest.

Of course, being unskilled is great for the nation...


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@nonk

And these plans won't save the country any money for decades so why are they so keen to rush it through?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:50 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

It'd make more sense to go straight into work and be unskilled

this is not always the outcome yknow.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:51 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

It is also how they keep vines and kiwi fruit from being damaged by frost in parts of New Zealand believe it or not.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:54 am
Posts: 13289
Full Member
 

Not at all. But then we are in a discussion about value for money which is very different to "can't afford to go". Again, unless you take the time to read through the proposal and do the maths to work out what this "massive debt" would mean to the life long earnings of someone on a modest post degree income, you don't necessarily realise how different this "debt" is to other debt we pick up (car loans, mortgage etc) where you are expected to pay it all back irrespective of income.

In a perfect utopian world I'd love to see a return of the 70's where most students not only got free education but also a grant towards living expenses, but then again 3 in 4 of our current students would never have made it there in the first place such was the difference in higher education numbers. Personally I'd can the nukes and use the money to put the current unwashed through university for free but as the majority of current students voted toryboy this time around they'll have to lay in their own mess!


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aye, but it's also not what I'd want to do with my life. I want to be a geologist. You need a degree for that.

I was also having a look at the money of it all today. My uni generates £300m for the local community. For every £1 put in by the government, it generates another £7.50.

Less students going=less money back. It'd be stupid to introduce these higher fees and lose that sort of income for the economy.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:55 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

oh sorry lifer..well being honest i dont know.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the subject of attack here should be Flashy's undemocratic attitude; we've done the Student fees thing several times already.

No, what I find sad is that someone could moan about the cost of policing a democratic protest. Simply because it doesn't fit into their own particular philosophical bubble. The other week, he was moaning about his journey home being delayed slightly. So was Woppit, today.

I can't stand that sort of attitude. Selfish and disrespectful. But anything that affects them, and you can guarantee they'll be writing strongly worded letters to the Mail and the Telegraph etc. And tutting furiously over their Supernoodles.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Scrap the nukes or get companies (and government advisors - Philip Green cough cough) to pay the tax they should!


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:01 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

would it focus the mind of more people though spokes?
you know what you want to be and it looks like your going to make it happen.
how many other students can say the same. do they all reach the goal of a great career with a good income.do they all have a goal?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:01 am
Posts: 13289
Full Member
 

Spokes - I'm 12yrs into being a teacher. Not a great paying job but I'm not exactly brasic either. On the proposed system I'd have to pay back £1200 pa on my current salary - or 3.4% of gross. In your first year as a teacher you would be paying back something daft like £35 - a year! No idea what a geologist earns but if modest like you say - you sure you could not afford those figures? It would be a pita, but doable and not enough to put me off. I suspect jobs that require graduate education will see a gradual pay rise to compensate too so the cost will be offset to employers in the long run.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but there is no money

Where do people get this stuff from ? The UK has the sixth largest economy in the world......with a population of only 60 million. It has a GDP/per capita [i]higher[/i] than the EU average. It is a member of the G7 group of wealthy nations - do you think we are about to get slung out because we are "skint" ?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm looking into teaching now simply because it pays more up front. Geological jobs do not pay well at first- most of the starter jobs (outside oil) are low paid (many now are simply volunteering so obviously you'd not pay anything back), and it takes a long time to get there in terms of a reasonable pay that wouldn't be impacted as much by losing more money.

Regardless of what happens, it's still double the amount of money to pay back and that's just too much even if it is spread out.

I think however the main issue is not the total amount but the way better universities will charge more. Regardless of what the actual situation is in terms of paying it back poorer, brighter kids will not go to more expensive universities. This stops them climbing the social ladder and bettering themselves, and in turn helping the economy. It's elitist. Why shouldn't those who work hardest be given the best opportunity?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well back to the helicopters thing, if the police hadn't been ready to (illegally) kettle from the beginning then the protestors wouldn't have bolted and led them on a merry dance around central London.

11.30

In Trafalgar Square there is a handful of soggy protesters and a few journalists. The plan today is that students will arrive here from 11am and then at about 12noon march down to Parliament Square – where there will be speeches and an "open mike".

They had agreed with police that the demonstration would finish at 3pm but interestingly some of the shopkeepers around Parliament Square say they have been told by the police that the students will be "held" there until 6pm.

Students who are setting up in Parliament Square are furious: "The police already seem to have decided to kettle the protest despite what happened last time and despite agreeing with us this week that the demo should finish at 3pm," said Maham Hashmi, from Soas (School of Oriental and African Studies).

12.15

There is a big police presence around Westminster, scores of vans parked up the side streets on Whitehall including at least one carrying police horses.

A couple of hundred people gathered in Trafalgar Square, with a very vocal group gathered underneath Nelson's Column chanting "give us back our EMA" as well as some rather rude things about Nick Clegg.

The march set off down Whitehall as agreed, but half way down was a line of few hundred police. Demonstrators turned and ran back up towards Trafalgar Square, sprinting across Horse Guards Parade and generally scattering everywhere.

Police are now giving chase across Horse Guards Parade. The demonstration is much smaller than last time, but there's definitely two or three thousand here.

[url] http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/blog/2010/nov/30/student-protests-live-coverage [/url]

The Met say that the lines of police in Whitehall were because the march started earlier than agreed, which the timings of the Guardian updates dispute.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you don't necessarily realise how different this "debt" is to other debt we pick up (car loans, mortgage etc) where you are expected to pay it all back irrespective of income.

Well that's the whole point.........starting off in life is hard enough as it is what with car loans, mortgages, getting married, having kids, etc. The last thing they need is another debt slapped on them......something has to give. And for some it will be higher education. Anyone who thinks higher prices won't reduce demand, doesn't understand how market forces work. A point which Ted Heath eloquently made when he criticised Margaret Thatcher for introducing NHS eye test charges.

And anyway, I thought this government was supposed to be completely against the "pay later" attitude ? ........debt is evil, we can't be in any debt, we must clear the deficit immediately, [i]blah, blah, blah[/i]


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:33 am
Posts: 13289
Full Member
 

Regardless of what the actual situation is in terms of paying it back poorer, brighter kids will not go to more expensive universities. This stops them climbing the social ladder and bettering themselves, and in turn helping the economy. It's elitist. Why shouldn't those who work hardest be given the best opportunity?

Sorry, I really don't get this bit. No one but the very very richest parents will be paying off their child's debt at the end of the course - I'd wager much less than 1% of all students. The vast majority of student's will be paying this back as effectively a graduate tax (as if you are in a modestly paid job you will never pay it all back and continue repaying for your entire career) out of [b]their[/b] wages. The wealth or otherwise of their parent's does not enter into the equation.

I'm still with you on the different institutions, different costs point though; although if the institution goes through the glass ceiling they will need to offer more grants and opportunities to the poorer applicants. What does worry me is that eventually the most expensive courses to run will cost more to go on. Anything that might put even more students off genuinely useful science based courses and towards history of art et al needs discouraging!


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Flashy's just jealous, 'cos they've got the balls to actually publicly stand up for what they believe in, rather than cower behind a stupid persona behind a keyboard. He can only dream of having such stones...

What are you some kind of sad east end snatch extra wannabe? Having the stones...sheeeshh.

As for being brave? Hardly! Its real easy to be brave when your part of a mob..

Apart from that - peaceful protest yes, violent disorder no. Taking to the streets & smashing the place up isnt going to gain any sympathy.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:34 am
Posts: 13289
Full Member
 

Ernie - don't get me wrong, my inner socialist would love to see all education free at the point of delivery. But it's not free is it. The government pays = we pay. If the government pays that means the tax of the 50% of the populous that didn't get to go is also contributing to the experience of the "lucky" half. Is it more moral for a true red to advocate "free" education to encourage the son of today's binman to "better himself" through education or to protect the binmen of tomorrow from paying for the leg-up given to the newly elevated higher earners that they did not profit from personally?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Everyone profits from a university educated person. Everyone is taught by a school teacher, products people used that are even as simple as a radio need a degree behind them at some point.

Convert- while I accept the point that in some situations it may be better in terms of repayment, it's still a massive mental barrier for people from poor backgrounds to over come building up that kind of debt. Even if they would be perfectly able to pay it back they won't go.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What are you some kind of sad east end snatch extra wannabe?

Why, you some sorta sad Haight-Ashbury hippy 'dude' who wears flowers in your hair and is like, far out, maaan...? Trippin...

Oh look, you've worked out I'm from the East End, and then wondered what sort of stereotype you can use to try to describe me. I say, how terribly clever of you, old chap.

Actually, FYI; proper East End Geezers are more likely to use the word that begins with 'b' and ends in 'ollocks'. Watch films like 'The Krays' and 'The Long Good Friday', and you might understand.... 😉

Apart from that - peaceful protest yes, violent disorder no. Taking to the streets & smashing the place up isnt going to gain any sympathy.

Erm, according to most news sources, the demonstrations were largely quite peaceful actually. Little bit of argy-bargy, but yer gonna get that when folk are a bit worked up.

I don't think London (and many other towns) have been smashed up, so you can relax...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no.
but there is no money.

Why is this?

Ah, could it be because those who are already lucky enough to have obtained a degree and a high paying job have lost it all? Just wondering...

Add to this the obvious fact that if the student doesn't pay now, then presumably the government does, and gets paid back very slowly (or most probably never in most cases), isn't this just a ticking time bomb of a massive amount of debt to the government that will just have to be written off?

I really cannot see one credible economic argument for the proposed fee increases.

The political argument is a bit more obvious though: Be seen to do something, whilst appeasing the uneducated masses that 'them crounging students' have to pay for their education. In reality however, they may well end up paying a lot less, leaving the treasury somewhat worse off...


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 3:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

jeeeeeez, its a couple of grand, whats the problem?

Alot of people I went to uni with really didnt need or want to be there, we need to get rid of the'has to have a degree' mentality. I have used very little of my degree in my job and i get on just fine. Lets start educating people with what they need and some common sense and maybe we can start moving the country forwards again.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 3:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

jeeeeeez, its a couple of grand, whats the problem?

It's not a couple of grand, it's paying a whole lot more for a whole lot less. It's introducing 'market forces' into education.

A lot of people I went to uni with really didnt need or want to be there

nothing like quantifiable evidence to really push your point home.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 10:04 am
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

[i]Devon and Cornwall Police:

The all inclusive cost is £1675 per hour, this includes everything including fuel, staff and insurance. The unit has an annual budget of 1,000 hours per year, an average of 2.75 flying hours per day. [/i]

But you've to pay the staff for a full year, so all their costs (should be?) in their too.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 10:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.lrb.co.uk/v32/n21/stefan-collini/brownes-gamble ]Browne report gamble[/url]

It is difficult to estimate – though some reports suggest it may be difficult to exaggerate – the damage that may be done to British universities in the short term by the abolition of the block grant and the wild hope that its functions will be taken over by some kind of market mechanism run by university applicants. At present, the block grant is the tangible expression of the public interest in the provision of good quality education across the system, and the means for universities to make informed intellectual choices about the subjects they teach. But before Liberal Democrat MPs sell their souls in the division lobbies, they need to consider the longer-term consequences for British education and culture more generally of implementing the kind of reasoning on which this report is based. What is at stake here is not primarily the question of whether this or that group of graduates will pay a little more or a little less towards the costs of their education, even though that may seem (particularly to those in marginal seats) to be the most potent element electorally. What is at stake is whether universities in the future are to be thought of as having a public cultural role partly sustained by public support, or whether we move further towards redefining them in terms of a purely economistic calculation of value and a wholly individualist conception of ‘consumer satisfaction’.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 11:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the damage that may be done to [s]British[/s] English universities in the short term by the abolition of the block grant and the wild hope that its functions will be taken over by some kind of market mechanism run by university applicants.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 11:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good input


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 11:30 am
 jonb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't agree with the plans, I don't agree with the riots but I think the rioters are in a small minority but getting most attention.

I remember someone telling me that it costs as much to keep a helicopter on the ground as it does to fly. Think that was mountain rescue as they were explaining why they took the helicopter out so much to rescue people. They could have been lying and just pretenting they were in Airwolf flying aound though.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 11:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They could have been lying and just pretenting they were in Airwolf flying aound though

Well if you had the opportunity...


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh look, you've worked out I'm from the East End, and then wondered what sort of stereotype you can use to try to describe me. I say, how terribly clever of you, old chap.

Why, you some sorta sad Haight-Ashbury hippy 'dude' who wears flowers in your hair and is like, far out, maaan...? Trippin...

Pot calling kettle.

Actually, FYI; proper East End Geezers are more likely to use the word that begins with 'b' and ends in 'ollocks'. Watch films like 'The Krays' and 'The Long Good Friday', and you might understand....

I dont think you have the faintest idea what a real "geezer" would say..

Oh & lastly you really do have a high opinion of yourself.... Compensating maybe?


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I dont think you have the faintest idea what a real "geezer" would say..

I love those sort of comments.......completely meaningless, and utterly pointless. But yet hugely amusing and entertaining. It reminds of a time once, when this geezer was accused by a barmaid of making a racist comment, he retorted with, "she wouldn't know a black man if one fell out of the sky and landed on her" 😀

As it happens, in real life, Elfinman is right posh git......what with having gone to private school and university. He might well live in the East End for its trendy appeal, but then so do the nouveau riche.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 1:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Every hour the helicopter is in the air costs one of the protestors a subsidised education? that and every windows smashed at conservative HQ.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 2:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As it happens, in real life, Elfinman is right posh git......what with having gone to private school and university. He might well live in the East End for its trendy appeal, but then so do the nouveau riche.

Thats why I said it..


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 2:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ha ha! Nice one Ernie! 😆

Repack; come, and I'll buy you a pint sometime. 😀


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 5:17 pm
Posts: 5909
Full Member
 

I feel your pain CFH - as a long-time resident of the Pimlico/ Victoria triangle, it's ****in noisy when they're hovering around Westminster, too. And they don't seem to stop til the early hours of the morning. 🙁


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 5:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oliverd1981 - Member

Every hour the helicopter is in the air costs one of the protestors a subsidised education? that and every windows smashed at conservative HQ.

Which are both a lot less that what is lost through tax avoidance or our subsidies of BAE systems, for example.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 5:26 pm
Posts: 5
Full Member
 

lets just call it £100,000 up front for all these here University courses - that should sort it...then we can go back to having loads of apprentices like plumbers and plasterers and that sort of thing....mind you - have to think this policy through of course....


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 5:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Repack; come, and I'll buy you a pint sometime

I know all about you & your offers of a pint.. Ill probably end up paying.. 😉


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 2836
Full Member
 

When I was at high school we had a visit from the Navy and one of their Seakings. At the time (a long time ago...) it was £1500 per hour IIRC so 2-3k would probably be about right now.


 
Posted : 01/12/2010 6:05 pm