how long has Gaddaf...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] how long has Gaddafi got to live?

60 Posts
37 Users
0 Reactions
218 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

the rebels have taken most of his compound now, nato has wiped out his army... is his death going to make a not safe for work video?


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:29 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Is he still in the country? I'm inclined to think not....


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'll miss his crazy shirts.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought he was a waxwork?


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Long gone.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:34 pm
Posts: 1930
Free Member
 

He'll be fine. He's safely ensconsed in David Chator's holiday rent in Abersoch 😆

If he is still in the compound then he could be dead within the hour.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:34 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Posts: 56836
Full Member
 

I've just seen him working on the tills in Tesco with Elvis and Jim Morrisson


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:35 pm
Posts: 34076
Full Member
 

i reckon he'll pop up at one of burlesconis sexy partys in a few weeks


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Presuming that the Colonel's goose is cooked, how long before people (in Libia and across the moralising west) began to wonder what happen's next? I reckon it'll be two and a half days after the bloodlust diminishes...


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:40 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

He`d be good on Celebrity Big Brother


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:41 pm
Posts: 56836
Full Member
 

I can see him working as an agent for a premiership footballer or two. Similar look and morals. Maybe Joey Barton and Craig Bellamy?


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now who's going to do the "Mars Attacks" Martian impressions?


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:49 pm
Posts: 31061
Free Member
 

I'm worried for the future of these girls...his personal guard (Amozon Guard).

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 3:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He may be in Libya but I doubt he's in the compound unless he's well dug in. An independance flag has now been raised above the compound although I can't see the fighting stopping any time soon.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

An independance flag has now been raised

Independence ? .........independence from what country ? 😕

The rebel flag is actually the flag of King Idris. King Idris was the last and only king of Libya. The hereditary monarchy in Libya was invented and installed by Britain to serve British interests. And King Idris proved to be very compliant to the needs of foreign governments, above the needs of "his" people. Western powers were allowed to help themselves to Libyan oil and both the US and Britain had a huge military presence in Libya, including a large US Air Force base near Tripoli. Whatever is happening in Libya today, and no one really knows, they are not building greater independence - Western oil companies are licking their lips as we speak.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...are doomed to repeat it


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well the people have spoken. If the general populace was all anti revolution I don't think that the rebels would have got far. I don't think Gaddafi needs to be executed but I fear he will be.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 8:10 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

nostoc - Member
He`d be good on Celebrity Big Brother

Along with Mugabe, Slobodan Miloševi? and Kim Jong-il.

"Gaddafi is in the diary room ..."


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 8:23 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 13566
Full Member
 

I'm worried for the future of these girls...his personal guard (Amozon Guard).

I have a vacant position for the second one in the line ...


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 6:13 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I think he's my favourite dictator, he had a flair and character not seen since Ide Armine.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 6:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

True, and he's good a good eye for a natty uniform.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 7:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

wrecker - Member
Well the people have spoken. If the general populace was all anti revolution I don't think that the rebels would have got far. I don't think Gaddafi needs to be executed but I fear he will be.

why? he is a very bad boy and needs to be killed in most awfully painful way


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 11:02 am
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

He`d be good on Celebrity Big Brother

Probably best to avoid talking about politics if you're one of the other housemates though.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 11:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You really think the population is behind the rebels? If they were this would have last a couple of days - think Romania. The "rebels" are a fragmented ragtag bunch of different militias with different agendas and without the support of the population in many areas

this will be a country in perpetual civil war from now on unless its partitioned


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 11:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

he lives in LA and changed his name to lionel richie


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 11:34 am
Posts: 13242
Full Member
 

It's high stakes hide and seek.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 11:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wrecker - Member
If the general populace was all anti revolution I don't think that the rebels would have got far

I think the rebels' progress is more to do with NATO's rather proactive "defence of civilians" than any measure of popular support 😕

Agree with Ernie and TJ, the worst is yet to come, by far.......


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

this will be a country in perpetual civil war from now on unless its partitioned

Rubbish.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 1:57 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15531
Free Member
 

I suspect that the oil deals done with the new government will be much more in favour of the oil companies, and the doctors and students that have been rebelling may not find their children have the same opportunities that they did.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 2:20 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

not sure it will be in perpetual war but the interventionist policies of the west [ oddly always in oil rich areas] rarely lead to stability and peace in the short or medium term.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 2:24 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

How long before we see the benefits of the revolution at the pump is what I want to know?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How long before we see the benefits of the revolution

Is how I read it

sorry - cross-over with the royals thread 😕


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 2:26 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

sorry - cross-over with the royals thread

We could melt the royal family down and make bio-fuel, the statement would then be true.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 2:32 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

No relevant comments to add to this discussion, but this pic made me lol

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 2:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He's a natty dresser, in't he?

I might get some ravioli for me tea....


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who's going to replace him now as the worlds most barking dictator?
I guess Kim jong il is the obvious choice, but those drip dry nylon suits don't really cut it. He is very good at staring at things though.
[url] http://kimjongillookingatthings.tumblr.com/ [/url]

Any other contenders?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 3:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gotta love Mr Kim;

Kim referred to Coca-Cola as the "cesspool water of American capitalism" and told his people that he invented the hamburger. He even built a hamburger factory, saying "I've made up my mind to feed quality bread and french fries to university students, professors and researchers even if we are in (economic) hardship." Go back and read that sentence again.

And according to North Korean news sources, Kim is the greatest golfer in the history of existence. He routinely finishes 38 under par, and he averages four or five holes-in-ones per game. He is rumored to spend $350,000 a year on brandy. He claims to have been born in a log cabin, his birth marked by the appearance of a double rainbow.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 3:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Allso gotta love the fact that many Americans think they also invented the [b]Hamburg[/b]er.... 😆


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 3:39 pm
Posts: 41690
Free Member
 

Allso gotta love the fact that many Americans think they also invented the Hamburger....

Most Ammericans are of german decent IIRC? It's just cool to be Irish or Italian, whereas being German was deeply un-cool, something to do with a war, you know, arround the time Russia decided StPetersburg was too german as well?G


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If they were this would have last a couple of days......

I am frankly stunned that it's taken the rebels six months to reach Tripoli. They had at their disposal the combined air forces and navies of the the most powerful military alliance in the world, along with the most advanced aircraft and missiles available. In contrast, the Libyan government had no effective air force.

I fully expected Gaddafi to fall within 48 hours or so of the first NATO strikes, if what we were told concerning the complete lack of support he has from the Libyan people was true.

Indeed less than four weeks ago it was reported in the Guardian and the Independent that Gaddafi forces were actually controlling [i]"around 20% more territory than it did in the immediate aftermath of the uprising on 17 February"[/i].

[url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/29/gaddafi-libya-nato ]Gaddafi is stronger than ever in Libya[/url]

The situation certainly now appears to have changed. But what has happened in the last 4 weeks which hadn't happened in the previous 5 months ? Well there's no evidence of a sudden change of allegiance in government held areas and popular uprisings in places such as Tripoli. There is however plenty of evidence to show an intensification of NATO bombing.

Had NATO simply enforced an actual "no-fly zone" over Libya instead of carrying out tactical bombing raids, then I fail to see why the rebels could not have easily disposed of Gaddafi. The evidence suggests huge opposition to the rebels.

As far as how long the fighting will continue, it's got to be anyone's guess. But I suspect that despite the fact they are referred to as "Gaddifi Loyalists", many who are staunchly fighting the rebels are not so much motivated by great love for their [i]Brother Leader[/i], but more motivated by deep hostility towards the Transitional National Council.

The reaction of residents in areas taken by the rebels, and the fact that have often been repeatedly driven out, is very telling. Human rights organisations have witnessed human rights violations in rebel controlled areas, and a couple of days ago the BBC reporter in Tripoli reported that a resident had told him of looting of people's houses by rebel forces. The rebels are not universally loved.

Furthermore even if the rebels managed to totally defeat pro-Gaddafi forces, an unlikely scenario unless NATO is contemplating carrying on bombing Libya indefinitely, there is no doubt that they will fight amongst themselves - they are already doing so. Last month the leader of the rebel military was assassinated by elements within the rebel movement, leading to a dangerous stand-off, and resulting in the entire rebel cabinet being sacked.

And the rebels in Libya's third largest city, Misrata, announced a few weeks back that they would no longer take orders from Benghazi and would operate independently - which they have been doing.

Add to this the fact that Al-Qaeda, who have long targeted Gaddafi's Libya, are very active in the rebel movement, as are secular pro-westerners, non-jihadist islamists, former government loyalists, conflicting tribes, and an assortment of looters/criminals, and you have a very dangerous mix. Whatever the final outcome "peace" is the least likely. Sadly.

Of all the articles I've seen recently in the British media which has slavishly towed the pro-western line on the situation in Libya, by far the best I've seen was in, of all places, the Daily Mail. Well worth a read :

[url= http://www.****/debate/article-2029026/Libya-Tripoli-falling-moment-Islamic-extremists-prayed-for.html ]Why this is the moment Libya's Islamic extremists have prayed for[/url]

Which all begs the question why ? .........why are western governments doing this ? And why single out Libya but not other countries in the region ? Well it is about oil, but it is also about a lot more. Including gold, the Dollar, saving the Italian banking system from collapse (Italy was initially the most ardent supporter of military action against Libya), and therefore also saving the Euro. And of course the Euro Zone is the UK's largest trading partner. But all that is another story.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 5:07 pm
Posts: 34076
Full Member
 

i think youre wrong ernie, libya was being very cautious initially with liby, burlscronie was reluctant to commit to any attack on libya, and his buddy gaddafi, with whom i believe he had 'traded' ladies in the past, not to mention the oil and invetsments in the country
[url= http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d24c9938-674d-11e0-9bb8-00144feab49a.html#axzz1Vy3Z7uiC ]http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d24c9938-674d-11e0-9bb8-00144feab49a.html#axzz1Vy3Z7uiC[/url]

now that gadaffis gone italy is desperate to get back into that pot


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

million pound bounty on Gaddafi now, dead or alive.....


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Despite Berlusconi being "cautious" about action against Libya kimbers, and for obvious reasons, he was nevertheless in the early stages, the most vocal supporter of taking action against Gaddafi.

[url= http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-22/berlusconi-hedges-bets-on-libya-war-outcome-by-pushing-for-nato.html ]Berlusconi Hedges Bets on Libya War Outcome by Pushing for NATO Takeover[/url]

Quote : [i]"Italy is in a tight spot; it has the most to lose"[/i]

He did express concern about the scale and targets of NATO bombing after things kicked off, and thereafter took a back seat. But he did get the result that he wanted when Libyan assets were frozen.

[url= http://news.sky.com/home/business/article/16055496 ]Libya Revolt Helped Stop Italy Bank Collapse[/url]

Quote : [i]"Trade in shares of Italy's largest bank has been suspended - as it emerges that events in Libya have helped prevent a collapse of the Italian banking system."[/i]

This war and the West's involvement in it has nothing to to do with saving civilian lives (did anyone think it did?) and much more to do with saving bankers, Libyan gold reserves, the Dollar being retained as the global oil currency, etc.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 5:59 pm
Posts: 1646
Full Member
 

Not seen for a few months, only heard, seen that just growing a beard as a disguise wont work (Saddam) He's been getting a new face and letting it heal up.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 7:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

he lives in LA and changed his name to lionel richie

Hello..... is it me you're looking for?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldn't like to be in his shoes now. Any dealings with these chaps don't usually end well;
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8721291/Libya-SAS-leads-hunt-for-Gaddafi.html


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 8:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It cant be easy being on the left right now. First they have to scramble to rewright history, that the rioters were the real victims of us nasty middle class families. Now a properly nasty gangster who has terrorised his own people and the rest of us for 40years is only days away from his cummupance they have to find a way to blame the West, tag him somehow as Our Guy or the rebels as the Bad Guys.

Libya isnt going to be stable for a long time but lets wish them well and provide what help we can, short of having the worlds finest infantry dig in in yet another Muslim country.

this will be a country in perpetual civil war from now on unless its partitioned

Jeremy, even for you, that is truly pitiful.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 9:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not that badly;

In July 1942 they destroyed 86 enemy aircraft and 45 motorised vehicles.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 10:08 am
 MSP
Posts: 15531
Free Member
 

It cant be easy being on the left right now. First they have to scramble to rewright history, that the rioters were the real victims of us nasty middle class families. Now a properly nasty gangster who has terrorised his own people and the rest of us for 40years is only days away from his cummupance they have to find a way to blame the West, tag him somehow as Our Guy or the rebels as the Bad Guys.

Its quite easy being on the left, its just about looking past the headlines to the reality behind and accepting that we all have had a part in creating the problems and need to accept our part in solving them.
But I guess its even easier to blame everything on everyone else, especially to blame the victims.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 10:13 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

It cant be easy being on the left right now. First they have to scramble to rewright history, that the rioters were the real victims of us nasty middle class families. Now a properly nasty gangster who has terrorised his own people and the rest of us for 40years is only days away from his cummupance they have to find a way to blame the West, tag him somehow as Our Guy or the rebels as the Bad Guys.

Wow. I'm just amazed that after the Iraq war and all that has come out about it since anyone genuinely believes this one is a humanitarian-led war (and that Libya just happens to have lots of oil too). Carry on believing what the (right-wing) mainstream media tells you, it's all true, honest.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 11:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

McBoo that is my opinion.
What will happen now is nato will install the most pliable person from the "transitional council" as president. He will invite in teh nato ground forces as training and security, a large part of the country and population will not go along with this. Civil war will ensue with the so called "transitional council" holding parts of the country under nato support and the rest in open revolt. Much like Iraq and Afghanistan


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 11:47 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Unsurprisingly the new Prime Minister was educated in the US, and favours economic liberalisation and privatisation of Libya's state industries. I wonder if US, UK and French companies will be involved in the new contracts?

Oh and it seems some of the claims made about human rights abuses used to justify the war were probably made up or massively exaggerated.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thats all entirely possible, but isnt that only one scenario?

"This will happen....that will happen......"

How about instead of like you willing the worst we hope for the best, maybe lend a hand if asked? That so bad?

I'm not that optimistic about any of these godforsaken countries, if there were going to be more than a couple of democtratic Muslim countries on the planet they'd have figured it out for themselves by now.

Oh and the reason we had all those soldiers in Libya once-upon-a-time was a little thing called the Defeat of Nazi Germany, my Great Uncle Sandy had the wounds and the malaria to prove his presence at Tobruk.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 11:56 am
Posts: 8393
Full Member
 

[url= http://francescadarimini.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/wheresgaddafithumb.jp g" target="_blank">http://francescadarimini.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/wheresgaddafithumb.jp g"/> [/url]

Click for biggerer.
Edit: was meant to be a thumbnail to click to link, but i've clearly forgotten how to do that.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 3:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"This will happen....that will happen......"

Well OK ..... forget about that if you want, and look at what [i]has[/i], and [i]hasn't[/i], happened.

First of all we were told that Gaddafi had no support at all amongst the Libyan people, and in fact only foreign mercenaries were willing to fight for him. False.

Then in February our Foreign Secretary William Haig, informed the world that Gaddafi had fled to Venezuela. False.

Then we were told that Gaddafi forces had committed all manner of atrocities but by June, after exhaustive investigations, human rights organisations announced that they had found no evidence of mass graves or mass rape or other abuses :

[url= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html ]Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war[/url]

Quote :

[i]"An investigation by Amnesty International has [u]failed to find evidence for these human rights violations[/u] and in many cases has discredited or cast doubt on them. It also found indications that on several occasions the rebels in Benghazi appeared to have [u]knowingly made false claims or manufactured evidence[/u]."

"Rebels have repeatedly charged that mercenary troops from Central and West Africa have been used against them. The Amnesty investigation found there was no evidence for this. "Those shown to journalists as foreign mercenaries were later quietly released," says Ms Rovera. "Most were sub-Saharan migrants working in Libya without documents."

Others were not so lucky and [u]were lynched or executed. Ms Rovera found two bodies of migrants in the Benghazi morgue and others were dumped on the outskirts of the city[/u]. She says: "The politicians kept talking about mercenaries, which inflamed public opinion and the myth has continued because they were released without publicity."[/i]

Then we were told that NATO would only take action to protect civilians and would not involve itself in the fighting, plus it would abide by UN Resolution 1973 which prohibits the arming of any side. All false.

And so the lies have continued unabated .... only a few days ago we told that rebels entering Tripoli weren't encountering any opposition, just cheering crowds, and that Gaddafi's sons had been captured. False.

Next we can look at things which [i]have happened[/i]. The military leader of the rebels, General Younes, [i]has[/i] been assassinated by other rebels, despite the National Transitional Council initially lying and claiming that pro-Gaddafi forces were responsible. And General Younes [i]had[/i] been arrested under the orders of NTC. The rebel leader Abdul Jalil [i]did[/i] sack the entire National Transitional Council. Rebels in Libya’s third largest city Misrata [i]are[/i] refusing to take orders from Benghazi. There [i]is[/i] huge tribal tension within the rebels, as well as huge political tensions, such as former Gaddafi officials v Al Qaeda.

So there you have it, just going by what [i]has[/i] happened, never mind what [i]will[/i] happen, we can say with complete certainty that the rebels are very prone to lying, and are already fighting amongst themselves.

I am no great fan of Gaddafi, he's clearly mad as a hatter, and ruthless with it - the muppet clearly needs to go. But I don't trust Cameron/Clegg, Sarkozy, and Berlusconi, nor the NTC, all of whom have proved to be liars. And I certainly won't support an Al Qaeda involved insurgency. A dictator would have to be very very bad indeed for me to back Al Qaeda's attempts to overthrow him. Gaddafi doesn't quite make the grade for me.

Of course my pessimism might well be misplaced, let's hope that it is, and that after recent events Libya turns out to be a model country in which all its peoples, and many tribes, live together in loving harmony, and Al Qaeda simply vanishes away. And just for bonus points, they willingly give us all their oil. Now that crystal ball gazing sounds a whole lot nicer.

.

It cant be easy being on the left right now.

Because of course the neo-conservatives have done such an excellent job in recent years in terms of the global economy and international relations ?

It seems to me that a few Daily Mail readers might feel a tad uneasy after reading this in [u]their[/u] newspaper :

[url= http://www.****/debate/article-2029026/Libya-Tripoli-falling-moment-Islamic-extremists-prayed-for.html ]Why this is the moment Libya's Islamic extremists have prayed for[/url]

The concluding sentence : [i]"Indeed, it is more likely to turn into the West’s worst nightmare."[/i]

Sometimes it can't be easy being a Daily Mail reader.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Someone summarise that for me. I really cant be arsed.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 8:34 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

But Ernie [s]wasted[/s] took so much time to write it all.....


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 8:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Someone summarise that for me. I really cant be arsed.

Basically I was agreeing with everything you were saying.

I bet that's come as a surprise to you.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 9:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surely Gadaffi is in Syria- most of the statements from him have come form Syrian TV or radio.
And it would be about right, Syria is also trying to kill everyone who says a bad word about them. Maybe Gadaffi and the Syrians are forming an allegiance and could bring in other middle eastern nutters who are homeless due to the Arab spring.


 
Posted : 25/08/2011 10:07 pm