[Closed] Harsh?

Do you have an opinion?

Judge Peter Clarke QC said: “ You thought you were having fun and you had the temerity to say to a woman with a two-year-old daughter ‘nice arse’.”

This Judge is clearly deranged.

My wife has had 3 kids and she still has a nice arse.

Wtf has cycling got to do with it, and why will banning him have an effect?

so when he does it when walking along are they going to ban him using his legs ? 😕

Obviously he's been lead astray with by the TDF podium girls

How the hell does an indefinite cycling ban get enforced?!
Basically, the pervy bastard has been let off.

maccruiskeen - Member
Do you have an opinion?

An indefinite ban though. It sounds so much like 'infinite'. And the guys a [i]cyclist[/i]. One of us. Putting aside his serial indecent assaults and child molestation for a moment its as if all cyclists are being punished by this.

Banned from riding a bike!! 😆 How on earth do they intend to police that!!

So by banning him from riding his bike they're implying that the bike was the trigger for his behaviour...i.e. he's only a bum groping pervert on two wheels.

Well at least he wasn't riding 2 abreast. Motorists want to make that a capital offence.

So by banning him from riding his bike they're implying that the bike was the trigger for his behaviour.

No - you're implying that.

serial indecent assaults and child molestation for a moment its as if all cyclists are being punished by this.

gives us all a bad name etc etc.

I like inappropriate touching as much as the next man. Only recently I pinched a colleague's arse as I opened the door after her appraisal. Should I be banned from letting women walk in front of me?

So by banning him from riding his bike they're implying that the bike was the trigger for his behaviour.

No - you're implying that

(are we allowed to ask for proof of MrsPerchy's "credentials")

(are we allowed to ask for proof of MrsPerchy's "credentials")

If you like. I have photos of all 3 children and birth certicates and everything. I was there when they were all born. They're definitely hers.

Not sure when grabbing someones arse became an “outrageous” sexual assault.

I had my arse grabbed once when cycling past some slow moving cars. Didn't cross my mind that is was am outrageous sexual assault. Just put it down as an everyone's human type incident...

If you like. I have photos of all 3 children and birth certicates and everything. I was there when they were all born. They're definitely hers

and she's already PM'd me some shots of her arse 😉

That's my arse.

Not sure when grabbing someones arse became an “outrageous” sexual assault.

That's my arse.

any port in a storm

That's ruined my ride tonight. I don't want to sit on the bike for fear of becoming a deviant arse grabber

Bloody cyclists

and she's already PM'd me some shots of her arse

Well at least he wasn't riding 2 abreast.

No he's clearly more of an ass man

Yes he should be had up on a charge and prosecuted appropriatey. But why can you get banned indefinitely on a bike, when drinking over the legal alcohol level and killing a cyclist only gets you a suspended sentence and only a 28 month driving ban.

Outrageous?

[img] [/img]

It's a good way to get around town is what it is

Harsh ???

More weird.... the judge seems as weird as the offender.

Going round grabbing girls (or even grown womens) arses.... sure but why remarking a woman with a 2yr old has a nice arse (or not) is somehow relevant or not is weird. I completely fail to see the relevance.

Banned from cycling ???
Again see no relevance here...

The judge seems like almost as big a danger to society as this bloke

That's my arse

Right ?

From the comments at the linked article:

Kill a cyclist in a car, £80 fine.
Pinch a few arses on a bike, indefinite ban and a suspended prison sentence. Not condoning what he did at all, but there is something seriously wrong and imbalanced in the world of sentencing.

What they said

[quote=scaredypants said]That's my arseOh, err, well, ... those pics I sent aren't of my penis at all. They're someone else's entirely so no need to show anyone else.
Right ?

I assume they're 42's?

(that's for the STW oldtimers- yes, STW did indeed have a resident "flasher" back in the day)