Forum menu
Gone to the dark si...
 

[Closed] Gone to the dark side - Canon to Nikon

Posts: 21
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#7686183]

Always been a Canon man from days of film and my A1's, F1n's, T90's, EOS 1VHS to digital D1s Mk2 and 3's and lastly a 1Dx but I've taken the plunge with Nikon. So far I've been very impressed and shall be adding to my kit as time goes on.
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 9:32 pm
Posts: 605
Free Member
 

Looks more like a frikkin telescope!


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 9:36 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

[url= https://farm1.staticflickr.com/350/20238154256_5fc64ae2d8_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm1.staticflickr.com/350/20238154256_5fc64ae2d8_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/wQnQb5 ]Nikon f2.8 70-200 plus x2 Teleconverter[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/brf/ ]Ben Freeman[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 9:47 pm
Posts: 12336
Full Member
 

Compensation much? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 9:49 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

To be honest the x2 was pretty rubbish, even though it was supposedly designed for that lens, the result is very soft, only used it once for the Olympic MTB race.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 9:52 pm
Posts: 78521
Full Member
 

You're dead to me now.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 9:54 pm
Posts: 40
Free Member
 

I did the same, but a few years back when the D800E first came out. Never looked back ๐Ÿ˜‰

But in the film days I was Nikon right the way through to the last body when I switched to an EOS3 (the old Nikons were all manual focus battleships - not all fancy dancy auto!).

I have a very old, very battered 70-200 f2.8 too, but tend to use smaller lenses!


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 11:01 pm
Posts: 1059
 

Why the switch? Is there no canon equivalent to the d800?


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 12:51 am
 Pyro
Posts: 2404
Full Member
 

Welcome to the dark side. You'll find we don't need beige lenses with the letter L on them to make ourselves feel good here. ๐Ÿ™‚

(2xD750, 1xD7200, 1xFM)


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 12:54 am
Posts: 13282
Free Member
 

Why would you do that?


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 6:02 am
Posts: 46112
Full Member
 

Meh. That's not the dark side. The new Pentax K1 however.....


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 8:06 am
 CHB
Posts: 3234
Full Member
 

Looks like you stepped into the light to me! (9 year Nikon user!).


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 8:19 am
 DrJ
Posts: 14013
Full Member
 

I am a Nikon user but I don't think the new Canons are worse than the D800/810 - certainly not enough difference to justify the cost of switching!


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 8:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Makes my D3200 look insignificant ... However I compensate by having a huge ***** ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 8:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Youre dead to me ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 8:39 am
Posts: 722
Free Member
 

I've come to the opinion that the Nikon zooms are better than cannon, but you can't get better than cannon l series primes


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 8:42 am
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

Is something deep and meaningful about photographers photographing their equipment ?

Or are they just as sad as mountain bikers ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 9:51 am
Posts: 10747
Full Member
 

It justifies having more than one camera


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 9:53 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

I always thought Canon bodies were slightly better but their lenses were slightly worse, not that there's anything in it really...


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 10:53 am
Posts: 3747
Free Member
 

What's all this nonsense? I thought this was STW; where are the Leicas?


 
Posted : 04/03/2016 10:53 am