Forum menu
EU Referendum - are...
 

[Closed] EU Referendum - are you in or out?

Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Amazing what having no seat to lose does to ones principles isn't it?

Scotroutes - the whole "sod the English" wing of the indy movement are frankly not worth listening to. Nationalism isn't something that's cuddly when it applies to your own beliefs, one nationalist is as bad as another. Note I'm going to distinguish between nationalists and pro-indy at this point as the motivations of each are different even if the end goal is the same.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 6:30 pm
Posts: 18029
Full Member
 

Unless he wins an election in which case he’ll have 5 years and all his rebels are gone.

Good reason not to agree to one then. Let the idiot stew.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 6:43 pm
Posts: 5171
Free Member
 

There is a growing section of the Scottish independence movement that is increasingly disappointed at the amount of energy the SNP are focusing on Brexit and who would likely think “why are we choosing which colour of government the English get rather than leaving them to get on with it”.

Ultimately it would not be in Scotland's interests to remain in the EU with a no deal England as its main trading partner. Scotland's economy will be in a precarious enough state even without having a hard border to the South


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 6:58 pm
Posts: 57397
Full Member
 

All Johnson’s rebels aren’t gone at all.

There are quite a few of the less unhinged members of the Tory party who are appalled by what he’s up too and how he’s treated their 21 colleagues. I doubt they’re feeling too loyal right now to someone who is essentially a school bully

There’s talk of a Tory/Farage coalition in the event of a hung parliament, but how many Tory MPs would balk at the idea of that?


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 7:02 pm
Posts: 31091
Full Member
 

Ultimately it would not be in Scotland’s interests to remain in the EU with a no deal England as its main trading partner. Scotland’s economy will be in a precarious enough state even without having a hard border to the South

Replace the word “Scotland” with “Ireland”… that gives you a feel for a more pressing problem that Wangerland is forcing onto its other neighbour.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 7:04 pm
Posts: 18029
Full Member
 

There’s talk of a Tory/Farage coalition in the event of a hung parliament, but how many Tory MPs would balk at the idea of that?

That's only going to work in the event of an election agreement where they don't field candidates in the same constituency. Can you see the Tories doing that?


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 8:25 pm
Posts: 57397
Full Member
 

The way the Tories are behaving this week, they may well be picking up Faragists, but I think they’ll have lost far more of their former voters to the Lib Dem’s.

They’ve basically become the Brexit party. They think that will win them an election, equating the opinions of Tory voters with that of their membership. I think (or at least hope) that they may be in for a bit of a shock with how many voters find see this toxic nationalism for what it is and simply will not vote for it

What’s clear is that when Johnson said ‘**** business’ he really meant it. I can’t see that playing out well for them.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 8:34 pm
Posts: 20666
Full Member
 

https://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.com/2019/09/johnson-bulldozes-britain-deeper-into.html

Good summary of the week so far.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 9:19 pm
Posts: 34535
Full Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hardly scientific I know but I’m getting worried that 75%+ of people the BBC News ask respond “just leave now” regardless of how they originally voted.

Exactly!


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So labour lose 2 percent of the vote to the brexit party and the conservatives lose 7.

Hahah, so much for the scare stories that labour would be decimated if they were seen to be thwarting brexit.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 10:30 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Hardly scientific I know but I’m getting worried that 75%+ of people the BBC News ask respond “just leave now” regardless of how they originally voted.

No, 75% of the people they show say just leave now. They usually show one or two of each side, to be representative - rather than giving an indication of numbers.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 10:40 pm
Posts: 34535
Full Member
 

DavidBelstein

Member
Hardly scientific I know but I’m getting worried that 75%+ of people the BBC News ask respond “just leave now” regardless of how they originally voted.

Exactly

I'm very worried coz if we crash out with no deal those people are going to be really upset when the realise that it means we repeat the last 3 years for the next 10 years trying to negotiate 40+ FTAs & our future relationship with the EU from a position of even.less leverage!

I know people don't like detail, but are they this unaware of what no deal means?


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 10:42 pm
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

After this week, anyone still supporting no deal need their head checked. They deserve all the insults coming their way.
Surely Leavers can see that no deal would be catastrophic.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 10:58 pm
Posts: 7751
Free Member
 

Kimbers, I've talked with a lot of people - family, friends and work colleagues - about this whole debacle; it's both depressing and concerning how many appear to have a very narrow view and limited understanding of the risks attaching to no deal/leave now and sod the consequences.
I think the people I refer to are a fair representation of the UK electorate - by gender, age, employment status, standard of education.
I don't understand why those who don't have a wider view or understanding don't have any (apparent) interest in gaining a better understanding.
We have (almost) no leverage now with the EU and what we do have will rapidly evaporate; the UK is nothing more than a side-show to the EU but it is a food source for the US to gorge on.
Future looks bleak unless MPs with vision bury Johnson under a runway at Heathrow, show Cummings for what he is - a fly feeding on shit - and take control of the Westminster agenda.
Referendum 2 with the result to be binding; voting questions being very carefully drawn - no more of the simplistic and infantile binary options last time around.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 11:14 pm
Posts: 44810
Full Member
 

kelvin

Subscriber

Ultimately it would not be in Scotland’s interests to remain in the EU with a no deal England as its main trading partner. Scotland’s economy will be in a precarious enough state even without having a hard border to the South

Replace the word “Scotland” with “Ireland”… that gives you a feel for a more pressing problem that Wangerland is forcing onto its other neighbour.

Indeed.

Either way the damage is bad - however I believe an independent scotland in the EU would be a nicer place to live than a UK out of the EU.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 11:16 pm
Posts: 20666
Full Member
 

I know people don’t like detail, but are they this unaware of what no deal means?

Scarily - yes. They imagine it's a cutting of ties, the divorce is wrapped up and we go sailing off free and able to get off with any other country we want.

I think part of the problem is that it's all been about "trade" and since no-one understands trade deals and the faact it can take TEN YEARS to sort one out, they're just like "oh, we'll carry on buying stuff".
No care about things like standards, import/export, just-in-time distribution, exchange rates, tariffs but beyond that it's about everything else that isn't "trade" like workers rights, human rights, environmental protection, collaboration....

Ad what's even more worrying is that no-one has gone "hmm, we were promised sunlit uplands, control and sovereignity and what we're actually getting is dire warnings about shortages and vague promises of "it won't be that bad... what's gone wrong with this?"

It's become a cross between religion and a conspiracy theory now and they're two things you just can't argue against.


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 11:23 pm
Posts: 34535
Full Member
 

Tbf a colleague in work declared at lunch this week she wants a second ref & a chance to vote remain

She's a surgeon & has had a fair bit of stick from her colleagues, but it's Johnson that has pushed her over the edge (that & the hospital having to ration cancer drugs & antibiotics again in prep for no deal)


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 11:37 pm
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

You'd think a surgeon would have at least a vague peripheral understanding of how supply chains linked directly to thier job function?


 
Posted : 06/09/2019 11:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I’ve met medics who still think vaccines cause autism and one of the thickest people I’ve ever had the pleasure of meeting (at a Wadham college bop I was invited to) was training as a neurosurgeon.

Being a clinician is not a vaccine against being a complete and utter ****wit. Just as the best education in the world can make you an arrogant, pompous, close minded terminal bore who is clearly suffering from the Dunning Kruger effect (Rees Mogg).

The only education that mildly protects you against it is an evidence based scientific education.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 12:27 am
Posts: 34535
Full Member
 

the chicken thing explained

https://twitter.com/JoshFeldberg/status/1170007720658984961


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 12:40 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

You don't need to be well educated you just need to be able to recognise someone who knows what the **** they are talking about.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 12:47 am
Posts: 34535
Full Member
 

You’d think a surgeon would have at least a vague peripheral understanding of how supply chains linked directly to thier job function?

It gets better, her husband is polish (also a surgeon) and she's upset about the way poles have been denigrated post brexit!

She's actually a really nice person, just easily led, she recently cycled from London to Paris on the velo vert , I found her some really good deals on hybrid bikes, she totally ignored me and spent £500 on the worst bso you can imagine, which she admitted was a nightmare after the first day!


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 12:53 am
Posts: 31091
Full Member
 

The opposition parties need a plan for this election before they let it be called… they can not go into it thinking it will be a normal election… if they do, they will get hammered…

https://twitter.com/peterkgeoghegan/status/1170047597916172289?s=21


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 12:59 am
Posts: 57397
Full Member
 

Exactly! They should know what they’re dealing with from the referendum campaign. They’re dealing with extremists to whom nothing is off the agenda as far as tactics are concerned

Every one of them needs to watch ‘The Great Hack’ to see how this is going to play out. This time will be even worse.

If they think they can go into this as a normal election campaign then they’re taking a knife to a gunfight where everyone else has fully automatic assault rifles and rocket launchers

Given the dithering 1970’s throwback presently masquerading as the leader of the opposition, it hardly inspires confidence.

Maybe someone could put ‘The Great Hack’ on Betamax for him?


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 1:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think any election will be totally unpredictable given the way brexit splits across party lines, FPTP voting, and that most often the Lib Dems compete with the Tories, not Labour.

Also interesting will be what happens when an election is called and the broadcast media have to give equal coverage to opposition parties. Of course, the brexit “party” isn’t actually a party


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 1:40 am
Posts: 14932
Full Member
 

Yes, as I say, they could end up propping up an unpopular government, they don’t want to, but when you think it through for the small parties it’s sometimes impossible to avoid.

Would be very surprised if the SNP prop anyone up in Westminster unless they have a cast iron plan.

One of the key arguments for independence is we in Scotland can't influence Westminster because whoever we vote for doesn't get into power.

A power sharing or supply and confidence arrangement wipes out that argument instantly.

I simply see the SNP using the 50 ish seats they win as grounds for pushing for another indy vote as that's clearly their mandate. They don't want to get into the dangerous ground that almost wiped out the lib dems following their coalition


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 2:07 am
 rone
Posts: 9787
Free Member
 

Hahah, so much for the scare stories that labour would be decimated if they were seen to be thwarting brexit.

Only it hasn't actually happened yet, so it's not really a fact.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 7:25 am
 rone
Posts: 9787
Free Member
 

The opposition parties need a plan for this election before they let it be called… they can not go into it thinking it will be a normal election… if they do, they will get hammered…

That will be recognised I'm sure but people will also vote on multiple factors.

For instance Farage's attitude towards the NHS doesn't do them any favours.

Equally Boris's police electioneering has been supported by the slightly older LBC demographic - as a good thing.

I'm also sure the Sun will find pictures of Corbyn near Mugabe's favourite haunt (despite Thatcher hanging with him.)

Will be getting some Labour posters in this time.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 7:32 am
 rone
Posts: 9787
Free Member
 

https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1170117064159350784?s=19

It's only a Poll ...

Where have tinge gone?


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 8:05 am
Posts: 17291
Full Member
 

Can we take from that poll that Dumbojo’s current stance isn’t working?

What’s the plan now? Go even more ludicrous or try to polish May’s turd?


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 8:50 am
Posts: 5836
Full Member
 

What’s the plan now? Go even more ludicrous or try to polish May’s turd

Ludicrous mode on tbh all the dying in a ditch rhetoric sorta points this way, he’s lining up people vs parliament and I’m expecting some great phrase similar to the ‘take back control’ to surface when the election starts.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:11 am
 DrJ
Posts: 14008
Full Member
 

Given the dithering 1970’s throwback presently masquerading as the leader of the opposition, it hardly inspires confidence.

Thanks for the reality check binners. For a moment we were losing sight of the basic fact that it's all Corbyn's fault.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:25 am
 igm
Posts: 11873
Full Member
 

Do we really have a PM who openly does not respect the rule of law? He’s said he won’t resign so where does this leave us as a country?

Mr Johnson may be forced to defy the law rather than ask for a new Brexit extension, according to a letter sent to Tory Party members.
The Daily Telegraph reports that Mr Johnson wrote to party members on Friday evening, saying: "They just passed a law that would force me to beg Brussels for an extension to the Brexit deadline. This is something I will never do."

https://news.sky.com/story/boris-johnson-prepared-to-defy-new-law-on-no-deal-brexit-11804118


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:29 am
Posts: 57397
Full Member
 

The fact that a Rogue prime minister, who’s presently committing constitutional outrages on a daily basis, actively wants a general election, because theirs a good chance it will deliver him a majority, is an absolutely shameful reflection on the ‘effectiveness’ of the Labour Party as a credible opposition

That’s the reality


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:33 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Off he'd better **** then. I'm sure even the remnants of the Conservative Party don't think that a PM who openly defies the law is a good look heading into an election. I imagine the Queen would have a few rather pointed questions for him too.

Opposition parties must be salivating at the thought of fighting an election against the likes of Sajid, Raab or one of the other Brexit bobbleheads. Or even a leaderless party in England and Scotland?
I must admit that after the last three years, the current travails of the Tories are providing a bit of light relief.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:38 am
 rone
Posts: 9787
Free Member
 

The fact that a Rogue prime minister, who’s presently committing constitutional outrages on a daily basis, actively wants a general election, because theirs a good chance it will deliver him a majority, is an absolutely shameful reflection on the ‘effectiveness’ of the Labour Party as a credible opposition

If only it were that simple.

1) You could argue that it doesn't matter what position Labour take - remainers have an inbuilt dislike of Jezza. You are a prime example. Thus the polls are not likely to reflect any logical moves by Labour. Like we've said it's driven by emotion.

2) Polls are laggy and don't necessarily reflect the actual voting position when in an election.

3) The opposition is effectively split across remainers/leavers/right/left.

4) The push against Brexit by the electorate just isn't strong enough unfortunately. Otherwise we wouldn't be here.

Libs being remain and to the the right will attract and repel some Labour voters.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:43 am
Posts: 34535
Full Member
 

It’s only a Poll …

Where have tinge gone?

They're lib dems now, chukka is standing against mark field, he of then grab a protestor by throat & father Liz trust's love child fame, which would be great to see, but would possibly take a remain alliance to see it not go Tory , it was one of the.most remain seats in the country, so chunks might be able to do it


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:46 am
Posts: 57397
Full Member
 

The problem is that you only had to listen to Emily Thornberry tying herself in knots on QT the other night to see that Labour’s Brexit policy is a rambling incoherent mess - their own
Leader wouldn’t necessarily campaign in support of a Brexit deal he himself negotiated?

Any upcoming election will be fought on social media with clear concise messages. Dom and Dommers message is as clear as day. Labour’s takes 5 minutes to explain all the caveats and ‘if’s..


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:52 am
 ctk
Posts: 1811
Free Member
 

IMO Tories are wrong to make this Boris vs Corbyn. Corbyn will not be as useless as they are portraying him come election time and this bounce/ momentum will be worth votes.

Opposition should make clear that No Deal is not the end of Brexit. Remain is the quickest way to end Brexit.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:55 am
 ctk
Posts: 1811
Free Member
 

Labours policy is not so different to the Lib Dems or Greens or SNP. Another referendum has to have a leave option.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 9:58 am
Posts: 34535
Full Member
 

Agree with binners

farage has raised millions in America,
Cummings still has his Cambridge analytics data
We know that Kate hoey gave farage labour polling data
There are some very suspect pro lexit webpages out there: Labour Heartlands & Nye Bevan News smack of Lyndon crosbys fake news pages he set up last time
https://www.sott.net/article/417953-Johnson-allys-firm-discreetly-runs-a-Facebook-propaganda-network-scam-of-professionalized-disinformation

I like thornberry but Labour's policy just made her look foolish, the brexiters have a clear message & they know how to manipulate


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 10:01 am
Posts: 8021
Full Member
 

their own Leader wouldn’t necessarily campaign in support of a Brexit deal he himself negotiated?

Sounds perfectly sensible to me.
Just because he negotiated a deal doesnt mean it would be better than remaining and would be ****ing stupid therefore to support it.
The alternative would be to leave Mays hard brexit deal or no deal. Since Labour are opposed to either then it is sensible to try and improve Mays deal even if they are against it as an option.
Remember a certain other referendum when the people calling it thought one option was so unlikely it wasnt worth thinking through the consequences of people voting for it.

Any upcoming election will be fought on social media with clear concise messages.

I guess there is the problem many people are too stupid to understand anything slightly more subtle than a binary question. However thats what got us into the ****ing mess to begin with.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 10:03 am
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

IMO Tories are wrong to make this Boris vs Corbyn

Isn’t that like saying that “Trump is ‘wrong’ to make this about MAGA vs Mexicans, Muslims and Muh-bama ”?

Seemed to work out great for him. Brexit has been fought using the same play-book

For how many years now have the popular British ‘press’ had Corbyn cast as the pantomime Commie Crocodile? Muslim-loving, bearded, terrorist-cuddling old grandad?

Populism/Nationalism only works in binary. See also Italy today. It’s only a matter of time until you hear the word ‘traitor’ as a shorthand term for ‘remainer’.

The no-deal game is nearing an end. They planned to kick the can down the road until now. To build up a head of steam. Now the time-is-running-out to Save BritainEngland from the Muslims, Poles, Frogs, Huns and Commies. And all that stands in our way are those traitorous remoaners who out of touch with Real British People who wish to make Britain Great Again. Who could be against that? Only a baddie.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 10:08 am
 rone
Posts: 9787
Free Member
 

The problem is that you only had to listen to Emily Thornberry tying herself in knots on QT the other night to see that Labour’s Brexit policy is a rambling incoherent mess

Don't agree, that was a classic case of heard mentality not being able to deal with the complexity of the situation and thus jumping on her because she didn't give a black and white answer.

She did clearly state her personal position versus delivery democracy.


 
Posted : 07/09/2019 10:10 am
Page 1603 / 1714