Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop
Unless you need someone to play a stiff upper class cold fish, or play Colin Firth, don't employ this luvee of luvees...
I expect the female population will be along shortly to say you're wrong.
can we swear now?
I owe him a big hug.
Hardly worth a burst vein. There is much worse than him; Hugh Grant for example, ok maybe not the worst, more like just as terrible. Still not worth a chewed lip.
He was excellent in A Single Man
What is it that upsets you about the wealthy and successful actor who is fancied by a large % of females?
deadlydarcy - Member
He was excellent in A Single Man
+1
Genuinely excellent.
Unlike Huge Grunt, he can actually act.
I want to meet him one day.
i thought he was ok in fever pitch too
At least he doesn't support the LibDems anymore............that must count for something surely ?
He was excellent in A Single Man
Absolutely.
And in a parallel kind of way George Clooney is superb in The American.
george clooney is usually pretty good in everything
loddrick's a scouser. They dislike anyone wealthy and successful Comes from the fact that anyone form Liverpool who is wealthy and successful immediately heads for the exit.
Why would you care so much that you had to tell us this? He's not even a mountain biker. ❓
I have it on good authority that Colin doesn't have a particularly high opinion of Loddrick either.
He was excellent in A Single Man
While the part required a particularly understated performance, his afforts were let down by (a) a weak script and (b) the film being over-styled throighout (Tom Ford's fault).
IMO it looked good but, scratch the surface, there wasn't much beneath it.
IMO it looked good but, scratch the surface, there wasn't much beneath it.
Yours and not many others.
It was supposed to be a highly stylised film FFS. If you're struggling to get to grips with it, Avatar is out on DVD.
He was good in that phonebox thingy film . . . .
It was supposed to be a highly stylised film FFS.
I am capable of discerning between stylised and lacking in content, and stylised and having some depth to it.
I don't doubt it's a beatiful visual experience (which it was), but the content - for me - just wasn't there.
Like I said, IMO. And I'm happy to swim against any tide.
He was good in that phonebox thingy film . . . .
You thinking of [url= http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0183649/ ]Phonebooth[/url]? If so, he wasn't in that one.
You thinking of Phonebooth? If so, he wasn't in that one.
pfff, . . . there was someone called Colin in it, . . that's good enough for me! 😛
A decent guy with integrity - to stand up and say he no longer supports the LibDems because of their dishonest 2 faced behaviour.
It makes a change to see an attitude like his among so many morally empty, ethic free public figures. I wish there were more with his integrity.
He has an [url= http://www.eco-age.com/shop ]eco-friendly shop[/url] in Chiswick deadly, I'm sure if you buy a nice lentil candle you'd get to repay him that big hug
pfff, . . . there was someone called Colin in it, . . that's good enough for me
Fair point, well made.
I am capable of discerning between stylised and lacking in content
Evidently not.
You're obviously more concerned about:
And I'm happy to swim against any tide.