Forum menu
Calais Migrant camp...
 

[Closed] Calais Migrant camp- a conversation

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

If the migrants want to stake a claim on a region it is very easy ... all they got to do is once they are naturalized (in the context of free EU movement) they all move to a region with lowest local population then overwhelm the local population.

Since the West always preach democracy and majority rules they will effective overrule the locals. Simple.

you're not in Borneo now chewy.. we has different rules here


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 5:38 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

yunki - Member
I'm assuming this wouldn't be your opening line?

Slight hijack ... perhaps queue up and be processed?

So then... what would you say if you found yourself in the camp speaking with one of them dirty rapey foreigners superstar1?

Zilt! Nothing! What can you do or say without being branded as racist etc?

yunki - Member
you're not in Borneo now chewy.. we has different rules here

Oh no you don't. It's democracy get it? We follow the legacy of British system ... within two generation (I think might be 3 now for newcomers) we are practically being squeezed out. Our population is not larger than Sweden but we feel the impact immediately. When the newcomers' majority increased our local tribes got squeezed out.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 5:39 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

What can you do or say without being branded as racist etc?

Something not racist. It really isn't that hard unless you actually are racist.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 5:43 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

MSP - Member
What can you do or say without being branded as racist etc?

Something not racist. It really isn't that hard unless you actually are racist.

What if I say along this line ... (assuming I am talking to the rapist [u]not the general public [/u]...)

"Oi you why did you rape that woman?"
"What makes you a vile being for raping that woman?"
"You are the lowest of the low for raping that woman!"

I can say all the above but it's meaningless coz they cannot even comprehend your language ... Woooshhh ... like hot air flowing through. They cannot understand at all.

Now, if we apply the universal language of pain then the story is different.

(Btw am I allowed to beat the person senseless? If not then the bureaucratic rules apply.)


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, my wife and daughter statistically have to worry about all the rapey white folk a lot more than some others.

Wrong. As a percentage of the number of rapes and size of the population white isn't the worse as Asian and Black have more rapists within their ethnic group. If your wife or daughter come across a "not stated" they'd better get the rape alarm out quick.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 5:50 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

Trying to keep implying asylum seekers/immigrants are rapists is racist. If you don't want to be called a racist prick, stop spouting racist bullshit.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 5:53 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

moose - Member
Using 2011 stats as an example to debunk the stupidity bukkake you just shot all over the thread. Again.

Moose if superstar1's statistic is accurate then that is the fact!

You can try to compare that to UK as much as you wish but it's meaningless. ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

MSP - Member
Trying to keep implying asylum seekers/immigrants are rapists is racist. If you don't want to be called a racist prick, stop spouting racist bullshit.

Ta da! Thank you for proving my point. ๐Ÿ˜›

p/s: thank goat the User Blocker(UB) works! ๐Ÿ˜† (I don't use UB btw)


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well as I don't live in Sweden, I don't really care about their crime stats. It was the implication that immigrants/refugees are rapists that was my issue.

How so Craig? All supernazi1 put up was 85% of rapes was carried out by immigrants. He didn't specify an ethnic group. He hasn't qualified his statement with an ethnic breakdown. They could all be white!


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:00 pm
Posts: 57390
Full Member
 

Blimey! This thread has quite rapidly gone a bit BNP, hasn't it? ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm sure the photo of the ISIS fighter/refugee will be posted soon. Even though it's fake and the man in question was actually a FSA commander who's unit was decimated so the remaining members hot-footed it out of there. But I digress.

Bloody muslamic rayguns coming over here stealing the jobs we don't want to do.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:05 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

moose - Member
Well as I don't live in Sweden, I don't really care about their crime stats. It was the implication that immigrants/refugees are rapists that was my issue.

Oh me goat! Do you sense inconsistency in your tone?
binners - Member
Blimey! This thread has quite rapidly gone a bit BNP, hasn't it?

Nope, I do not associate myself with the extreme right, extreme left, middle right, middle left whatever ... ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not at all, what I posted was about as relevant as what our closet nazi posted. Totally irrelevant and off topic.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


How so Craig? All supernazi1 put up was 85% of rapes was carried out by immigrants. He didn't specify an ethnic group. He hasn't qualified his statement with an ethnic breakdown. They could all be white!

I hadn't commented on Superstar claims as he didn't put up lists of populations and rapes by ethnic group like you did. If you're going to put all that then make a claim then check the figures before doing so.

Rapes by size of ethnic group:

White 0.000017%
Black 0.000063%
Asian 0.000022%

Only read the first and last pages of this thread. If this is a sample of the population this country ****ed from not only the bigoted but the rose tinted views of others, not much in the middle ground.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:19 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

craigxxl - Member
Only read the first and last pages of this thread. If this is a sample of the population this country **** from not only the bigoted but the rose tinted views of others, not much in the middle ground.

We are screwed aren't we? Screwed! ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

"... rose tinted vies of others ..." <= I like this polite description. ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:24 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I like being in the middle ground. I can be just a little bit racistish there and hopefully, nobody will notice unless they're some PC gone mad types who get professionally offended on behalf of others.

The middle ground - it's where it's ok to be y'know, just a bit this and just a bit that.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fair point. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Problem is the middle ground gets lost in the noise from right and left. I've deliberately avoided the obvious security issues that a refugee crisis from Muslim countries presents in todays climate. I briefly mentioned it, If I were an IS planner, I would definitely use this opportunity to get some faithful soldiers in through the system, the issue would be logistics, how they would arm themselves and plan such an attack. I imagine it would take quite some time for them to establish themselves and make contact with like minded nationals. Hopefully by that time the security services have done their thing and they're picked up. But that risk is not enough in my mind to deny help to so many displaced by war.

Any response needs to be measured and sensible. Not influenced by knee jerk responses from either side, just plain sensible and humanitarian measures, that keep the refugees safe and the population of whichever country they finally arrive in.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:27 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

deadlydarcy - Member
I like being in the middle ground. I can be just a little bit racistish there and hopefully, nobody will notice unless they're some PC gone mad types who get professionally offended on behalf of others.

The middle ground - it's where it's ok to be y'know, just a bit this and just a bit that.

Oi you where is your User Blocker? ๐Ÿ˜†

So what ground are you on? Left, right, centre etc? Where? ๐Ÿ˜›

moose - Member
Problem is the middle ground gets lost in the noise from right and left. I've deliberately avoided the obvious security issues that a refugee crisis from Muslim countries presents in todays climate. I briefly mentioned it, If I were an IS planner, I would definitely use this opportunity to get some faithful soldiers in through the system, the issue would be logistics, how they would arm themselves and plan such an attack.

I agree.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm definitely feeling a bit more racist as a result of this thread..

My left leg has become very suspicious of people what are browner than me and my stomach is feeling totally sympathetic towards Chinese cuisine..

My nipples have got browner too which made me admire a passing woman's figure earlier


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:34 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

yunki - Member
I'm definitely feeling a bit more racist as a result of this thread.

Does that mean you have been influenced?
The question is if you were influenced whose fault is that? ๐Ÿ˜†

My left leg has become very suspicious of people what are browner than me and my stomach is feeling totally sympathetic towards Chinese cuisine..

Congratulation! You have now been assimilated. Bow and thank the might wok that cooked your cuisine. Also soup is clear NOT creamy ... ๐Ÿ˜›

My nipples have got browner too which made me admire a passing woman's figure earlier

No, that could be health problem ... ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:40 pm
Posts: 57390
Full Member
 

Nope, I do not associate myself with the extreme right, extreme left, middle right, middle left whatever ....


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

Binners,

Reminds me of this ... not sure if everyone gets it but here you go coz it's funny. (not implicating anyone ... )


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 6:55 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

Nope, I do not associate myself with the extreme right, extreme left, middle right, middle left whatever

I am losing track now, so binners is THM, and chekw is Donald Trump?


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 7:00 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

MSP - Member
I am losing track now, so binners is THM, and chekw is Donald Trump?

๐Ÿ˜† Trump has more hairs than me ...


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 7:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dear me, you are all putting your faith in the governing classes and they are betraying the British people. Who are the governing classes? Conservatives? Labour? the EU? the United States?

Take Moose for example, he has been shit upon by the British government, he joined the Army and they sent him to Afghanistan, then they put rules of engagement in place meaning the campaign was unwinnable leading to the British Army taking massive casualties and achieving nothing. And ex military are suffering from PSD and some are homeless living on the street and the government doesn't give a shit. And all because the British Government were desperate to appease the Muslims that have the cheek to call themselves British in the UK.

What an absolute piss take, and you all can't see it through your rose tinted spectacles.

Pitiful.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:04 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

Wow, we are overflowing with racist cocks tonight.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:08 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

MSP - Member
Wow, we are overflowing with racist cocks tonight.

Do you equate Muslim with race?


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:14 pm
Posts: 8161
Free Member
 

It's people's response that buggers up threads imo, not Chewwy's drivel.

Was that aimed at me?


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:17 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

gofasterstripes - Member
It's people's response that buggers up threads imo, not Chewwy's drivel.

Was that aimed at me?

Oh dear ... Ernie is in trouble. ๐Ÿ˜€

gofasterstripes aren't you supposed to have User Blocker on anything Chewwy? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:22 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

Superstar you do realise that the Muslim appeasing government went to war to fight the islamist Taliban don't you ? Which bit of the ROE do you think were different in Afghanistan to other operations ?


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:23 pm
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

all because the British Government were desperate to appease the Muslims that have the cheek to call themselves British in the UK.

It was really George Bush and his mate Blair that were intent on fulfilling biblical prophecies as Gog and Magog were busy in the Middle East. Sadly this absurd reason for going to war is the real one. [url= http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/politique/chirac-bush-et-l-apocalypse_746203.html ]Or the one given to Chirac to try and persuade him to join in anyhow[/url]


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Superstar1, do you get all your info from the daily mail. ROE are there to ensure that the rules of war are followed. IT has never hampered me dispatching the Queen's enemies. Most people do not realise where or how such things are drawn up. It's not made up and is drawn from UK law. And as UK doesn't allow the death of people for a variety of reasons, therefore we cannot go around and kill with impunity.

I won't even go into the rest of your mess, it will derail the thread even more, needless to say you need to dig into the information a little bit more. Just because it appears on social media doesn't make it true.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:27 pm
Posts: 8161
Free Member
 

I don't filter anything, chewy. We have our past, anyway...


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:35 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

Labour (Blair) took us to the "big" war, ya, you did ... ya ... freedom and all that.

crankboy - Member
Superstar you do realise that the Muslim appeasing government went to war to fight the islamist Taliban don't you ? Which bit of the ROE do you think were different in Afghanistan to other operations ?

Ya, but the govt still need to appease the moderate at home don't they? Otherwise no votes.

Also diplomatically the govt want the support of the oil rich middle east nations so they have to tread carefully not to offend the moderates and as a result had to fight with one arm tight behind their back. Not to go in full gun blazing but enough to show that they are doing something ...

A bit like Churchill caught in between the giants of USA & CCCP in WWII... innit! Churchill had to maneuver carefully between them two giants otherwise they would take over the entire operation. ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

gofasterstripes - Member
I don't filter anything, chewy. We have our past, anyway...

:mrgreen: No worries ... think I have mistaken you for someone else ... d'oh!


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:36 pm
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

Hollywood and Chewkw, rewriting history since... . ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:45 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

Edukator - Troll
Hollywood and Chewkw, rewriting history since... .

No, no ... I got that from Yesterday channel on telly where a Professor was narrating over Churchill dilemma with the two giants. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:58 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

I think I love Moose. In a manly, heterosexual way obviously. Mostly.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 8:58 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

Northwind - Member
I think I love Moose. In a manly, heterosexual way obviously. Mostly.

๐Ÿ˜ฏ

Make sure you fist bump and gangster hug ... watch your hands ... ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:03 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

So go on chewkw in what way was Afghanistan fought differently to any other similar operation so as to appease Muslims?


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So go on chewkw in what way was Afghanistan fought differently to any other similar operation so as to appease Muslims?

I'm curious too. ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:15 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

crankboy - Member
So go on chewkw in what way was Afghanistan fought differently to any other similar operation so as to appease Muslims?

I am sure it is not as large a scale as Iraq if I can recall or the other way round ... ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:20 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

Silly answer we are not talking about scale we are talking about in what way were different rules applied to appease Muslims.
Given the largely Muslim population of Iraq you don't make your Muslim appeasing point by reference to that conflict anyway.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:26 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

crankboy - Member

Silly answer we are not talking about scale we are talking about in what way were different rules applied to appease Muslims.
Given the largely Muslim population of Iraq you don't make your Muslim appeasing point by reference to that conflict anyway.

More drone strikes less foot on ground ... ๐Ÿ˜›

Foot on ground = invasion force.

Drone strikes = "Thunder from sky".


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] ?w=500&h=398[/img]


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:30 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

moose - Member

:mrgreen: That's hilarious!

My view (arm chair general) is that they opened two fronts (the enemies). ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:32 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

Drone strikes were to appease Muslims that worked well . Not sure we used that many drone strikes in the initial Afgan operations which were very much boots on the ground . We even built fighting bases to seize and control the ground and draw the Taliban into shooting matches.


 
Posted : 07/09/2015 9:35 pm
Page 12 / 13