A question for the ...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] A question for the STW runners

198 Posts
39 Users
0 Reactions
601 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

barefoot shoes ARE bad, barefoot however 😀


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 

why would encouraging people to try barefoot running be a marketing gimmick? you cant sell people new feet

I think thats just been answered.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

to me barefoot IS barefoot, nothing on your feet! minimalist, bare foot, barefoot shoes etc IS marketing guff.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:13 pm
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 

to me barefoot IS barefoot, nothing on your feet! minimalist, bare foot, barefoot shoes etc IS marketing guff.

Fair enough. How much and how often do you run?


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

3 - 4 times a week, on and offroad. anything from 1 to 10 miles. i will don shoes (inov8) for fell races though 😀


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have these: http://www.vibramfivefingers.com/

When I bought these I had spent somewhere up to 3 - 400 quid over a period of 6 years on trainers ranging from around £20 to well over £120 a pop. These were just another attempt to avoid shin splints, the only one that worked.

Damn.

I've been drawn in.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

DrDomRob - Member
I have these: http://www.vibramfivefingers.com/

When I bought these I had spent somewhere up to 3 - 400 quid over a period of 6 years on trainers ranging from around £20 to well over £120 a pop. These were just another attempt to avoid shin splints, the only one that worked.

Damn.

I've been drawn in.

they were perfect for giving me stress fractures in my feet, lovely 🙁


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Okay, so dare I say I'm more confused than ever now!!! Didn't mean to open the can of worms that is the barefoot running debate either. Okay let me clarify a bit more, I used to runs alot in my youth, (county/east England X country) and although I have always jogged, I would like to up my level and intensity, with it potentially putting me to a stage where I would feel comfortable attempting my first tri, currently using some Asics road shoes, and although can't avoid running on road at times, having recently relocated to the South Wales Valleys it seems a shame not to make use of the hills and open space around me, but having looked at the available shoes I was/and still am bewildered by the selection available, I understand that fit is important, my winterwalking boots are a pair of Scarpa that have to be nearly 7/8 years old, fit like a glove and are wearing very well, hence why I'm going to a shop to be assessed, I just wanted some pointers and peoples experiences of various shoes, and if full on fell shoes are what i need or would a good cross/trail shoe suffice. I hope this helps to clarify what I'm after, and I realise it is a bit of a what tyre for everything type thread, so should I say, what shoes for mostly off road/grassy hills/bridleways, with the odd bit of road/Tarmac?


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]they were perfect for giving me stress fractures in my feet, lovely [/i]
Me too! But I still love em 🙂


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

whatever fits your feet and your comfortable in! enjoy 😀


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How much running did you do in them? I dropped down to doing about 10 minutes at a time when I first got them, I am now running about half an hour or so outdoors and a bit longer on the treadmill. But that depends on how fast I set the thing going.

I'd like to point out that I stop when my calves adn feet start to hurt. I've been injured enough over the last 11 years that I have learnt to listen to my body and not push it.

The down side is that I don't often get the all over workout lungburn feeling I used to get when I used to do longer runs. Just feet and lower leg ache.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

IanMunro - Member
they were perfect for giving me stress fractures in my feet, lovely
Me too! But I still love em

yeh weird that cuz i still love mine, you used huaraches yet? they are great.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they were perfect for giving me stress fractures in my feet, lovely

That's the trouble with minimalist shoes, really easy to do too much!

Bet you've been having fun running barefoot in snow 🙂


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I made the mistake of seeing how fast I could run downhill on about the second or third time I used them 🙂
But after that I was a lot more cautious and gently worked up to about 20 miles as the longest run in them.

PS.
Apologies for not having anything constructive to help the OP with.
But this is STW, so you must have set your expectations low anyway 🙂


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:38 pm
Posts: 91098
Free Member
 

I think Nike Frees have somewhat less of a heel (ie height differential) than many normal shoes:

[img] [/img]

vs

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have to admit I haven't been running at all over the last week 🙁 But if the snow comes back whilst I am in Newbury at the end of this week then I'll be doing a couple of runs then.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ron - I'd personally go with some barefoot ones...... I don't really know what else to say, barefoot all the way!

When the shop gives you your feedback ask them why whatever they say is a problem / positive. Get them to explain themselves with reasoned argument. Don't take what they say on face value.

Legs are a beautifully engineered system of springs of levers, in my opinion anything that reduces your ability to use them in that way is not a good thing.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 7:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]yeh weird that cuz i still love mine, you used huaraches yet? they are great[/i]
I haven't really got on with them. Though I only tried them out a couple of times off-road on recently ploughed land and got pissed off with the front of them folding under if I caught my foot on stuff. Quite fancy trying a pair of terra plana achilles when they come out though.


 
Posted : 06/12/2010 7:05 pm
Posts: 75
Free Member
 

ronjeremy - I wouldn't get fell shoes, they'd be wasted on mixed terrain. Something like a Mizuno Wave Harrier has good grip in a harder rubber that won't evaporate on contact with road. They're not overly cushioned, fairly small differential between heel and forefoot and fairly low to the ground, so you should be safe if marauding packs of gait police are patrolling your area.

Avoid anything with a higher heel, if not for heelstrike offences, but because you'll go over on your ankle and cry like a girl. I speak from experience. Some trail shoes are like road shoes with a bit more tread. And don't worry about water, goretex lining etc. Aim for the puddles.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lesson - never come to STW for running/shoe advice.

IMO at least 90% of this thread is complete BS written by those that are cr4p runners anyway. A few snippets of good advice but it's hard to find...


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:12 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

IMO at least 90% of this thread is complete BS written by those that are cr4p runners anyway. A few snippets of good advice but it's hard to find...

*sigh*

....and what gives you the qualification to jump down from on high and make such a statement?

Sometimes you really post the most dickish things Mat.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:27 am
Posts: 91098
Free Member
 

written by those that are cr4p runners anyway

Harsh, Mat! Since you've got no idea how good anyone is.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Surf-Mat - Member
Lesson - never come to STW for running/shoe advice.
IMO at least 90% of this thread is complete BS written by those that are cr4p runners anyway. A few snippets of good advice but it's hard to find...

Could you point me in the direction of the good stuff then please..


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:32 am
Posts: 91098
Free Member
 

It comes from Mat himself. Who is by his own admission not a serious runner.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 11:53 am
Posts: 75
Free Member
 

[i]Could you point me in the direction of the good stuff then please..[/i]

I think lots of people tried to help. It's just that some of them have different views, what with it being a forum and all. That's a lot of words wasted then. I withdraw mine.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 11:54 am
Posts: 7753
Free Member
 

But you all know Matt's the best. Well you should cos he keeps telling us he is....


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 4:53 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

[i]A few snippets of good advice but it's hard to find... [/i]

actually I think the overall advice is pretty much the same which ever side of the barefoot-running shoes divide you're on, and that's:

find a shoe that will allow you to run without pain.

some advocate barefoot shoes, others like normal cushioned trainers, go with whatever works for you.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 4:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Stever, wasn't meant as a snide dig and apologies if that is how it was taken, was meant light heartedly to try and draw a line under the barefoot debate. I have digested alot of what has been said and I will admit that I think I have a clearer idea of what questions I need to ask and what I am looking for, I think I will steer clear of the barefoot ones for a while until I have a gauge of how my running is and also I have something to actually measure them against. Thanks all for your opinions and advice, I will probably post back after i have had my assessment with the verdict and also with what I end up getting (I like the look of the Mizuno ones, but ultimately fit will be a big factor), thanks again peeps and I hope you are all well.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 

IMO at least 90% of this thread is complete BS written by those that are cr4p runners anyway

Strong words Surf Matt but probably true


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 5:43 pm
Posts: 31061
Free Member
 

He's in the cooler for 2 days after a brush with the swear filter earlier.

Half of what he said in that post is true. I'm not saying which half I agree with though. 🙂


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 5:47 pm
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 

Probably all that barefoot running bul**** wound him up.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 6:02 pm
Posts: 7753
Free Member
 

Thing is, if running barefoot was such a blimmin good idea, we would all wouldn't we? If you're that convinced, save £££'s and run barefoot, No? Thought not.

Hasn't anyone realised it's just another marketing niche for the manufacturers to exploit.

Better? Worse? No, different.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 6:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Barefoot running also makes people far more mellow, so they don't suffer from this issue 🙂


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 6:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

IMO at least 90% of this thread is complete BS written by those that are cr4p runners anyway. A few snippets of good advice but it's hard to find...

So what defines a "good" runner then?


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 7:07 pm
Posts: 7753
Free Member
 

lookmanohands - Member

IMO at least 90% of this thread is complete BS written by those that are cr4p runners anyway. A few snippets of good advice but it's hard to find...

So what defines a "good" runner then?

Overinflated opinion of self worth and called Matt? 🙂


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 7:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😀


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 7:16 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Barefoot running also makes people far more mellow, so they don't suffer from this issue

That would explain why most hippies eschew shoes.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 7:16 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

So apart from the Vibram Five Fingers what decent "barefoot" shoes are out there?


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Inov-8 are bringing some out soon. Evoskins? A lot cheaper than the Vibram.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Terra plana evos are worth a google Shandy, or maybe Mizuno wave universe 3 for something better known.
Or feelmax if you want something very thin.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 9:31 pm
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

"Barefoot" shoes? I run in these with no insoles, pretty minimal.
[img] [/img]

I won the White Peak marathon earlier this year, i don't know if that's a good enough qualification to post Surf-Mat...?


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:11 pm
Posts: 683
Free Member
 

What [url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/a-question-for-the-stw-runners#post-2070417 ]Bomba said[/url].

It's taken me an ankle injury that's kept me out of running for the majority of 2010, and subsequently a great specialist physio who's opened my eyes to the body's capability, and the need for a thinner soled shoe to feel the ground as opposed to a over engineered running shoe that becomes a cast and lets your muscles degenerate.

I've switched to a certain type of cheap footwear - mimicing the Vibram 5 fingers but costing a tenth of, in order to simulate the barefoot running style but with some layer of protection for the sole, and am loving it.

The body knows how to run. Search YouTube for running style videos by Christopher McDougall (author of Born to Run). If you want to buy in to the expensive running shoe system that's fine, but it won't stop you from getting injuries.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:13 pm
Posts: 683
Free Member
 

[url=

McDougall YouTube vid[/url]


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 10:19 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Thanks for the pointers, I think I might go the whole hog and get the Vibrams.


 
Posted : 07/12/2010 11:33 pm
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like my Nike Red Rocks. I read all the stuff about barefoot / minimal cushioning running etc. and thought it made sense, but I found that whilst it was fine on the flat, running downhill with relatively little cushioning hammered my knees as they took almost all of the shock. Switching to something with some bounce to it let me heel strike a little when running downhill and made running a massively more pleasant experience.

That said, I'm a fairly casual runner, and Red Rocks aren't anywhere near as "off road" a shoe as some of the stuff posted here. That said, they work fine for my bridleway runs. It seems to be a very "horses for courses" thing - neither New Balance or Asics came anywhere near fitting me, so they were straight off the list.


 
Posted : 08/12/2010 12:23 am
Posts: 75
Free Member
 

ron jeremy, ok I withdraw my withdrawal. If you get on with the Harriers and know they fit, they often pop up cheaper here and there.


 
Posted : 08/12/2010 8:46 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Sprints are 60 notes on here and KSOs are 70, thats a decent discount. It almost seems too good to be true...

http://www.seenontv24store.com/vibram-fivefingers-classic/fivefinger-ksos/vibram-fivefingers-kso-shoes-black-mens.html


 
Posted : 08/12/2010 11:16 am
Posts: 91098
Free Member
 

The body knows how to run.

This is a myth imo.


 
Posted : 08/12/2010 11:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you can try it for yourself - find a nice big room / warehouse / long corridor with a good hard floor.

take off your shoes, and start running - nice and slowly.

you'll be better than you expect.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 10:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Finbar - of course you do. Flipping (is that a swear word? 🙂 impressive.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ask Andrew Murry on twitter
http://www.scotland2sahara.com/
he is in the middle of doing 3000 miles for charity, averaging 30-35 miles a day. So he may have an opinion on shoes.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So what is his opinion?!


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 10:48 am
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 

Finbar, 3:10 off road? Very good 😆


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 10:52 am
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 

take off your shoes, and start running - nice and slowly.

you'll be better than you expect.

But do we have any feedback from competitive runners or those like me averaging 50 mpw?


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 10:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Overinflated opinion of self worth and called Matt

The second time you've tried to get everyone's attention and been ignored there Boblo. Some issues by any chance? Mummy not giving you enough attention.

Anyway as clearly stated, I'm not hugely into running but do okay (just "okay") in 10k trail races. Some are VERY into running but get cr4p results. Some are very into into and get brilliant results (like Finbar and Surfer). These are the ones to listen to, not some all the gear no idea runner who isn't very good


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 10:59 am
Posts: 7753
Free Member
 

Aaah Matt, back from exile. Good to see you back on the forum, thought I might be joining you on the naughty step yesterday.

Just joshing with you old son and you do bite rather easily 🙂


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:18 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

not some all the gear no idea runner who isn't very good

I have a pair of trainers....is that too much gear?


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 7753
Free Member
 

Just listen, don't argue/ask questions...


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've run a few sub three hour marathons in the past as a club runner. That's before I stopped running because of osteo-arthristis in both hips. Averaged over 50 miles a week for years peaking @ around 80 miles in marathon training. All I'd say is stick with good cushioning & don't listen to all this barefoot crap. The impact of the footstrike affects the whole body. I must also say that alot of my training was off road as well ...light permitting. Buy the best shoes you can afford & change them regularly depending on mileage ; I'd say every 6 months at least as a regular runner


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

Not sure Surf mat approves your sub 3:00 hour time, is it awesome enough? Only then will we know if your advice is worthy.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:37 pm
Posts: 683
Free Member
 

molgrips -

The body knows how to run.

This is a myth imo.

Not really - run down the street in running trainers, then try the same stretch barefoot - whereas before you may be heel striking the ground, your body will automatically adjust to more of a mid/fore foot plant when running barefoot.

As I've experienced first hand, you may need to do some work in awakening certain muscle groups that haven't been used as much due to years of running in trainers, but the body does have a system in place to cope effectively with running without any aids.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"As I've experienced first hand, you may need to do some work in awakening certain muscle groups that haven't been used as much due to years of running in trainers, but the body does have a system in place to cope effectively with running without any aids."

Maybe....but it's still useless advice in the long term

djglover...do I need to provide evidence?


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:42 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

🙂 Don't ask me dude


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

D28boy - Member

Maybe....but it's still useless advice in the long term

why is it useless?


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

why is it useless?

Re-read my post or don't ..it's up to you...it's your body...

Anyway I don't use tyres on my bike anymore... it just developed a system to cope effectively without them....oh & I fell off as well


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 683
Free Member
 

Maybe....but it's still useless advice in the long term

Well I'm not here to give you advice, I was responding to molgrips' myth comment.

The idea that cushioned running trainers alleviates impact of footstrike doesn't take into account the whole picture. The cushioning which creates the barrier between foot and ground creates problems as there is a need for the foot to feel the ground, and the brain to recognise when that is happening. More cushioning = harder footstrike, generally on the heel = ankle injuries.

Personal choice though, but the switch is working for me.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

(sighs)

your posts read:

"i was a good runner (you were), i love heel striking i do, now i've got arthritis in my hips, all this fore-foot advice is useless."

(i've summarised a little).

do you think the advice is useless - cos our bodies know how to do it anyway?

or do you think the advice is uselss - cos the very idea is silly?

(sub 3 hours is very impressive, your opinion carries weight)


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:00 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I am just going for a run now....I just don't think I am going to enjoy it knowing that I am probably rubbish and not reaching for the max and pumping that burn...or something like that.

....I do enjoy being out in the countryside tho.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:04 pm
Posts: 683
Free Member
 

I do enjoy being out in the countryside tho

Best bit for me. I'm a half decent runner but can't be bothered with the competitiveness over times. Up early for a run in great surroundings is where the enjoyment lies for me, not shaving a couple of seconds off my 10k time.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:08 pm
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

Finbar, 3:10 off road? 😆

Thanks Surfer, it's a lot slower than the normal winning times for that race but it was about 30 degrees C, which suited me just fine and apparently didn't do the competition any favours.

Back on topic, i ordered some Vibram Fauxfingers from dealtoworld about a month ago. Worked out at ~£21 in total. If they ever turn up i'll post a review.

[url= http://www.dealtoworld.com/goods-19110-FiveFingers+Outdoor+Sport+Shoes+for+Female%EF%BC%88Male%EF%BC%89+-+Black+%28Size+45%29.html ]Linky[/url]


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ahwiles-I believe most quality trainer manufactures spend time & money developing their shoes so that the rotation of the foot on contact with the ground mimicks the foots natural action. Cushioning is simply that...an attempt to reduce the impact force on the body when this occurs. They manufacture shoes for specific purposes, weight reduction ultimately leads to quicker times but lighter shoes offer less protection & more vulnerability to injury long term. Race in lightweights train in more cushioned/heavier shoes would be my advice.Heel strike is different for runners of differing abilities. If you watch a middle distance athletes there is very little heel strike ...a jogger has a lot but shoe makers offer support in both area's.

I'm not saying I'm definitely right & they are wrong ...just that I believe if you're running any distance regularly on roads or hard trails a light/no shoe will lead to injuries/joint issues. Also have you ever stepped onto a flint on the ball of your foot in a light shoe when running/racing? That bruised bone can hurt for weeks!

Thanx for the comment of my opinion carrying weight...I'm noticing that more & more since I've stopped running.

Only wish I could still go out for a nice run in the country any time I wanted!


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:17 pm
Posts: 683
Free Member
 

just that I believe if you're running any distance regularly on roads or hard trails a light/no shoe will lead to injuries/joint issues

Runners must have been completely crippled before the invention of super cushioned, advanced running shoes that's subsequently calmed the number of sustained injuries then? Oh...


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hey Jolsa- I'm not rising to your trol. I'm simply trying to offer my advice as someone who ran regulary for more than 20 years in response to a reasonable question. Take it or leave it


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lovely run in the countryside just now - it's reached a sweltering EIGHT degrees here! A random mixture of still solid/frozen ground and mud.

Nice and sunny too.

I think the Army term works well with running - unless an elite runner KISS.

Keep It Simple, Stupid.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 1:53 pm
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 

Runners must have been completely crippled before the invention of super cushioned, advanced running shoes that's subsequently calmed the number of sustained injuries then? Oh...

Some where some werent. The attrition rate was high however. As someone who believes that athletes years ago (UK) trained harder, were faster and tougher than today I still believe that cushioned shoes (to a greater or lesser degree) help many people remain injury free and make running more accesible to more people.

your sub 3:00 hour time, is it awesome enough

But theres sub 3 hrs and sub 3 hrs 😉


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 7753
Free Member
 

Hey SM, have you got any pictures of roads to show how good a runner you are? Y'know, like those pictures of the sea you put up recently 🙂


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 2:03 pm
Posts: 7848
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 2:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Quick check on boblo's previous posts (who you ask? Yes I wondered too).

Every SINGLE stalker geek box ticked.

Stroll on laddio.

Next.

Surfer - pic not working. I ran with the mutt too - always fun.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 2:08 pm
Posts: 7753
Free Member
 

Bingo! 🙂


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 2:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I see - a victory through being an anonymous stalker nerd.

Interesting...


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 2:28 pm
Page 2 / 3